It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Another example of how the media can twist the stories and make people believe what they want them to. So the policeman was trying to 'protest' and condemn the actions of its employers, ie, Israel. And did it peacefully.
Originally posted by spencerjohnstone
Another example of how the media can twist the stories and make people believe what they want them to. So the policeman was trying to 'protest' and condemn the actions of its employers, ie, Israel. And did it peacefully.
Exactly, once again the media inculding the Sun newspaper has blown this out of all preportion.
Until there is a full investigation the rumours will fly around. (Which is underway).
In anycase, this particular police office has not right to pick and choose which ambassy he wants to guard. He signed up he took the oath to protect the puiblic under any circumstances. If it is proven that he refused on morale grounds. Then he should have either been sacked or suspended.
No Army officer can refuse to carry out his orders on morale grounds, he would be court martialed.
So what is the difference between the both none.
You cannot decide to change your mind, just because you do not agree with it on morale grounds.