posted on Oct, 5 2006 @ 10:49 AM
9/11 wasn't the only event that had suspicious goings-on surrounding it.
For the Oklahoma City Bombing, did you ever see the pic of that Ryder truck in a military base near Oklahoma some weeks before the bombing? Or hear of
the unexploded charges removed from the building?
What about the 1993 WTC bombing? Did you ever read of how the FBI was allegedly trying to lure a "terrorist cell" into doing something illegal so
they could bust them? The FBI was claiming to have offered non-functioning explosives to terrorist suspects by proxy and trying to instigate a
bombing. Of course when it actually happened, those were the scapegoats, and that was the FBI's story, since there was already too much evidence
for them to claim no involvement (their contact had recorded hours of conversations with them over the phone when he became suspicious;
these are either destroyed by now or still classified). An FBI special agent also testified in court, a Dr. Whitehurst, that he had been pressured to
reach pre-formed conclusions about the nature of the explosive itself, which suggests something foul in regards to where the actual device(s) came
You may already be familiar with what was proposed in Operation Northwoods.
Even in other countries, the Jakarta and Bali bombings have become controversial due to nature of the explosions (massive energy releases from
relatively small areas, ie, the inside of a car; the explanations of the types of explosives used shifted pretty often in the case of the Bali bombing
at least, from C4, to an FAE, to all kinds of garbage, nothing explaining great thermal releases for large distances, large craters in the ground,
etc.), foreign leaders in those areas publically suggesting Western involvement. Certain bombings in the Mid-East, like the bombing of a Mosque that
ALL Muslims considered holy, displayed odd damage, as a roof was ripped out with the insides standing fine (shaped charge?), much concrete
turned to fine dust, and yet rebar still intact. What explosives are these terrorists using, exactly?
The next big attack, the next 9/11, so to speak, will be another one of these, in my opinion. They've been saying we're going to get nuked by
a terrorist for years, so that's what I'm guessing is coming. Either a dirty nuke (conventional explosive with radioactive material strapped on), or
something more sophisticated, and then they throw a fit and invade a few countries, like Iran, all the while talking about how we should have gotten
them earlier when we knew they were developing nukes (for energy, big difference) but the damned liberals were too pansy to invade for no reason!
Either that or some bio-terror attack, is what I'm expecting anyway. Just my couple cents on that.
[edit on 5-10-2006 by bsbray11]