Originally posted by brainsucker
You will not embarass me... Because you could not provide a shot of the plane debri deflecting (A shown by NIST), aside from the columns and chunks of building blowing out by the massive combined internal explosion.
Anyway I'm very interested in seen more work about this.

Good try with the shadow but thats very loooooong into the explosion.

"With the WTC planes, their inertia was enough to not cause any deflection outside the WTC, but upon hitting beams/structure inside the WTC, the aircraft would have broken up, slowed down and stayed inside the building. Glass and other small pieces would have fallen down but due to the overall intertia of the aircraft, it would not deflect as per the NTIS example."

Here we go... The NIST simulation of the impact is not real, it has to do with something that happened let's say in Dresden at the end of WWII. I understand; NIST is not modeling the reality of the WTC impact... It is doing some other work.

>>With the WTC planes, their inertia was enough to not cause any deflection outside the WTC<<
NIST shows that not to be the case. ie: you are stating the opposite of what we can clearly see in the NIST model.



[edit on 2-10-2006 by brainsucker]

[edit on 2-10-2006 by brainsucker]

Originally posted by brainsucker
You will not embarass me... Because you could not provide a shot of the plane debri deflecting (A shown by NIST), aside from the columns and chunks of building blowing out by the massive combined internal explosion.
Anyway I'm very interested in seen more work about this.

Good try with the shadow but thats very loooooong into the explosion.

"With the WTC planes, their inertia was enough to not cause any deflection outside the WTC, but upon hitting beams/structure inside the WTC, the aircraft would have broken up, slowed down and stayed inside the building. Glass and other small pieces would have fallen down but due to the overall intertia of the aircraft, it would not deflect as per the NTIS example."

Here we go... The NIST simulation of the impact is not real, it has to do with something that happened let's say in Dresden at the end of WWII. I understand; NIST is not modeling the reality of the WTC impact... It is doing some other work.

>>With the WTC planes, their inertia was enough to not cause any deflection outside the WTC<<
NIST shows that not to be the case. ie: you are stating the opposite of what we can clearly see in the NIST model.



[edit on 2-10-2006 by brainsucker]

[edit on 2-10-2006 by brainsucker]

Originally posted by brainsucker
No... NIST shows us a CLOUD, C L O U D of debri flying. Go back to page one (Or get the PBS documentary) and show us that cloud please; before the massive explosions start to burst of course.
Because in page one you can see the plane vanished and no cloud...

Originally posted by LAES YVAN



I don't want to do it, but I'm just going to call you an idiot.