It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bootyac
darksided,actually frigates do have missles.I have worked on the Brooke and O.H Perry class ships before (P.S.N.S) so I know from first hand exp that they do./quote]
I understand they used to, but they don't anymore.
The SM-1 launchers were removed from OHP frigates a couple years ago. The US Navy no longer has frigates with missiles, unless you count point defense systems like the SEARAM which is replacing the Phalanx system.
Even the 8 OHP is reserve had their missile launchers removed. The SM-1 missiles were sold to Turkey, Spain, Australia, and Taiwan. Since the SM-1 also launched the Harpoons on the OHPs, the OHPs no longer have Harpoons either.
Look it up if I am not trustworthy enough of a source.
Originally posted by donwhite
I’m told oil is fungible. Although that is not exactly true, it must be true enough to make it irrelevant where Iraq’s oil is sold. I am under the impression that Iraq oil is pumped, piped and shipped by American firms in Iraq. There is only one market for oil - the world market. Oil prices are based on the price of Brent field oil. Different crudes have been assigned different ratios to the price of Brent. If there is any profit in oil, the US firms are making theirs. And then some!
Well, D/S, just based at who is fighting where it looks as if the US might also qualify as a “bully?” The Middle East is a socio-econo-religio-politico area that we have never known or understood. In fact, in our own bellicose and condescending way, we feel we don’t have to understand them, but they better understand us! That ‘stiff’ attitude is what cost us 59,000 KIA in Vietnam and has cost us nearly 3,000 KIA in Iraq - so far.
I’m not sure it is going to work out as you suggest, Mr. D/S. It looks more likely to me that we will vacate the premises and the area will fall under the control of Iran. Hegemony. The West will have its outpost of Israel, but even that is beginning to look in doubt, demographically speaking. I wouldn’t bet Israel will be Jewish in 2048.
Originally posted by Wizard_In_The_Woods
Dear Deessell:
Eureka! Nice music too!
Seriously, it’s a VERY interesting site. I would have never found it “on my own”. It’s weird how search engines overlook/ignore URL’s which seem to perfectly match the entered search parameters. Thanks!
Greetings,
The Wizard In The Woods.
posted by darksided
The individual firms are, but not the US government. China has deals with Russia specifically that allows them to get oil under market value, at a bulk buy investment rate pro-rated over annual periods. While the rest of the world was paying $75, China was getting their oil for the same rate as last years negotiated value of around $50. I think the Chinese are better businessmen than the Bushys. [Edited by Don W]
While I agree the western tactics of war are 'bullyish' I'm not sure I totally agree with the argument that we need to understand them thus accept their value system.
I think the west needs to make a stronger effort to export ideology to the Middle East in ways other than war or eventually the sparks will lead to greater fire. You can't stack a virtue system that is based on preserving life (west) and exercising liberty (west) against a value system that promotes suicide bombing in the name of Jihad and persecution of non-believers and expect co-existence between extremism in Islam and the western secular society. To believe otherwise is to believe you can put a fire out by shooting gasoline through the fire hoses.
I understand respecting religions, but shouldn't religion also respect the secular nature of democracy. I don't know about Jews in Israel in 2048, but I do often ponder if Europe will be forced to submit to Islam or die by 2050.
I think there is a disconnect between our definitions of winning and losing. What are the objectives. I agree with those who say the US is winning the military, it is clear the terrorist groups are getting their tails kicked from one end of the planet to the other.
However the question is whether Iraq will become some sort of proxy for Iran in the future, or whether the Iraqi government can hold off the challenges from popular Shia religious militia elements looking to take power. I don't know that answer, and I think that result is directly tied to whether the US stays in Iraq or not.
The theory is that America is less popular, and is less respected, to the rest of the world because of Iraq and this popularity and respect somehow matters. I tend to disagree with this completely. Besides national pride, what has the US ever actually gained by popularity or respect in the world? There is no example of a successful negotiation taking place as a result of Americas popularity or respect, there is no example of a major advantage exploited militarily. What then does loss of American popularity or respect by the world really mean? Nothing in my opinion. Ultimately what keeps even the pope safe and the continent confident in its vain dialogues with Iranian lunatics is the United States military and the very un-Europeans who fight in it.
Originally posted by steve99
It's amazing the ideas people come up with after watching a tv show.
Originally posted by donwhite
Let’s cut to the chase. Are you saying, albeit politely, that Christianity is superior to Islam which is inferior? Are you declaring the Great Commission is your Divine Grant to take this message to those people? Did you skip the Crusades in your history class? For 300 years the Christians - more united then, then now - waged total war on the Muslims. It all came to naught. Review the Thirty Years War and read the Peace of Westphalia. Let humanity never again become involved in spreading the Truth by Violence.
I thought Bush43 said the goal in Iraq was to establish a democratically chosen government favorable to the West. We did indeed accomplish the easy part, the overthrow of Saddam, between March 18 and May 1. But by the time Bush43 claimed victory on the Lincoln, the insurgency had already begun. Look how many men of ours were killed in the past 7 days.
The Taliban is back in Afghan. We have shuffled that theater of war off onto NATO, but there is enough backlash that I foresee NATO pulling out falling the November r7 election. It’s our mess, let us clean it up. Do you honestly think we are “winning?” 3 years into this thing and we lose more KIA now than ever and you call that “winning?” I’d hate to see what you call losing. Face it, D/S, you’re being lied to.
So bottom line, you’re asking, who will have the honor to be the last American GI to die in Iraq? We cannot possibly think we can undo the intra religious strife that has permeated the Middle East since the 7th century. Where do we get those kind of ideas? Are we manic or are we just plainly stupid? We have made a mistake. Phooey on the intentions or reasons. We are now in a mess, a genuine quagmire. So how do you extract yourself from a situation you cannot control and you cannot end on your terms. The simple answer is you ask a third party to come into Iraq and negotiate your exit. The world is getting tired of having to fix the mess this Bush43 administration has brought on. Maybe they will have mercy on us and do it one more time.
President Bush claims that the United States is “working toward a diplomatic solution to this crisis...” But U.S. military preparations belie this talk of peace. On September 17, speaking to a group of peace activists, former CIA official Ray McGovern offered a dire warning: “We have about seven weeks to try and stop this next war from happening.”
Originally posted by darksided
There are currently only 4 ships in the entire US Navy deployed on 'surge' deployment, and 2 have been deployed for almost their full tour. Those four ships are the USS Hue City, USS John E Williams,
Originally posted by rich23
Originally posted by darksided
There are currently only 4 ships in the entire US Navy deployed on 'surge' deployment, and 2 have been deployed for almost their full tour. Those four ships are the USS Hue City, USS John E Williams,
I have to say this post made me smile, because if the USS John Williams were a person, they'd be running up against all sorts of problems trying to get on a plane, because
that name is on the no-fly list!
[edit on 6-10-2006 by rich23]
2004 AEGIS BMD Test
The Missile Defense Agency and the U. S. Navy moved closer toward fielding a homeland missile defense capability by successfully completing a special event concurrent with the RIMPAC (Rim of the Pacific) 2004 exercise in the Hawaiian operating area. The event, called Pacific Explorer III, held last week at the Pacific Missile Range, Barking Sands, Kauai, was the latest, in an ongoing series of exercises, in which AEGIS ships conduct Long Range Surveillance and Tracking of ballistic missiles and successfully communicated that information in support of the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS).
The exercise was conducted under the operational guidance of Commander, Third Fleet, and included participants from U. S. Strategic Command, Northern Command, Commander, Pacific Command, and Seventh Fleet in Japan. THIRD Fleet participants included the USS Lake Erie (CG 70) and USS Paul Hamilton (DDG 60), both outfitted with special AEGIS Ballistic Missile Defense computer programs and equipment, plus F/A 18s from the aircraft carrier USS John C Stennis and a Navy Special Warfare Task Group. Other missile defense participants included the 100th MDE Brigade from Colorado Springs, CO, operating the Ground-Based Midcourse (GMD) Defense System.
posted by darksided
“ . . I am advocating certain virtues over others . . I do so because the virtues have been well established in International Law for centuries. Murder isn't a virtue, even if it carries a religious purpose or context, and that is a message that needs to be exported. [Edited by Don W]
This is an ideological war with a military element, not a military war with an ideological element. Right now we are fighting the latter, we need to be focusing on the former.” The model for Iraq is clear, but no one wants to discuss it the problem is the leadership of it . . the current media cycle of all bad news is good news . . do you know why Northern Iraq is peaceful? Do you know why they are prospering? . . it is a common vacation spot, so how then is it peaceful? . . The reason is because they had a 10 year head start at working out the tribal and cultural divisions of their area. In 1993 Clinton implemented his best foreign policy, he told the Iraqi Army to stay away from the Kurds of the North or he would bomb them.
Not to mention Bush43's problem with the Global War on Terror he treats it as a military policy, when in fact what we need is an ideological policy that highlights Islamic moderates instead of highlighting Islamic radicals . .
it is about following models that have worked . . visible today in Iraq, a model you never hear about. Prosperity in Iraq for Iraqi's is the ultimate victory . . American haters don't want this . . BTW, I think your plan for a 3rd party is foolish, the fate of Iraq doesn't depend on anyone from the outside, it doesn't even depend on US troop numbers it depends on Iraqi's, specifically Iraqi Sunni and Shia tribal leaders who are feeling the pressure to get the police and security forces up to par within their country.
I think the US could add or remove 100,000 troops and it wouldn't make a difference in the outcome, the only difference maker in Iraq is the training and development of Iraqi's to police and protect their own nation. It is the biggest problem with the current policy, only around 4,000 US troops are involved in training and observing Iraqi units, I think that number needs to be tripled. [Edited by Don W]
..In remarks made before the House of Representatives passed the bill on
September 28, its sponsor, Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, noted that
the sanctions under Title II of the bill target Iran's energy sector.
"Knowledgable experts agree that for Iran, a fuel importer, sanctions could
be crippling," she said..
Iranian Freedom Support Act
Originally posted by Augmenter
It won't be the U.S.S. Enterprise. It'll be the U.S.S. Dwight D. Eisenhower.
www.navy.mil...
Recent Deployment -- I have an extended family member on the ship who say's It'll be deployed either to the Mediterranean or the Persian Gulf for assistance in Iraqi Freedom. Unfortunately, I'm thinking the Persian Gulf, making easy prey for "Iranian" anti-shipping missiles.
The ship has just been recently retrofitted in Newport News, Virginia as well.