It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
So who cares if the myths are true or not; ...Who has time to think about the collective unconscious when the bill collector is knocking at the door?
Most of us are too busy just trying to put food on the table and a roof over our heads to care about such nonsense. ...Perhaps instead of being taught how to make a living, we should be taught how to live. Why is so much emphasis put on earning money? If earning money is the prime motivation of society, then they who are in the money business have quite an advantage over all the rest of us.
Perhaps what is missing from government is a basic philosophy that grounds and centers the government for a reason to be, and not just to survive or perpetuate life, but an actual goal, and means to obtain such ends, that are worthy of our toil. There is a rhyme and reason, but seldom is it pursued. In fact, it may actually be purposely hidden from view in the name of pence over whence. Overwhelming toil can create the acceptance of the unacceptable.
Very interesting. On the subject of myth vs. truth: The stories do not have to be taken literally to be important. The meaning is the important thing. It doesn't have to be true to be meaningful. [Edited by Don W]
On the subject of money, I am a Marxist: There are only two classes, either you own the means of production, or you don't. The middle class is an illusion, created to keep people from fighting the elite. Either you represent capital, or you rent yourself out to someone that does.
As long as the lower class is busy arguing amongst itself, the real oppressors can go on about their business. [Edited by Don W]
posted by wellwhatnow
I am curious about something you said soficrow. According to Marx there are only two classes of people so to my way of thinking, the anti-monarchist movement and the anti-bourgeois movement would be one and the same. Why do you separate them? I am genuinely curious for more info. [Edited by Don W]
Perhaps instead of being taught how to make a living, we should be taught how to live.
Gilgamesh was 'designed' by Aruru: Two-thirds of him is god, one-third of him is human. The Great Goddess [Aruru] designed(?) the model for his body.
***
Both Fuxi (Fu Hsi), and also Nüwa, are the god and goddess husband and wife credited with being the ancestors of humankind after a devastating flood. ...
A stone tablet, dated 160 CE shows Fu Xi with Nüwa, who was both his wife and his sister.
***
Gilgamesh is awesome to perfection. It was he who opened the mountain passes, who dug wells on the flank of the mountain.
It was he who crossed the ocean, the vast seas, to the rising sun, who explored the world regions, seeking life. It was he who reached by his own sheer strength Utanapishtim, the Faraway, who restored the sanctuaries (or: cities) that the Flood had destroyed! ... for teeming mankind.
***
...Fu Hsi was not a man but a god coupled with the Universal Muse, the Goddess of Creation, Nu Kua (Nuwa). Chinese traditions, according to Walter, date tales about Nu Kua back to at least 2500 BCE. The "gua" of the bagua are part of her name, "kua."
***
Details of the Nuwa flood stories clearly share commonalities with other Global Deluge traditions, and are worthy of note:
* global flood or calamity (Gong Gongs destrucion)
* destruction of humanity and animals (explicitly described)
* select pair survives calamity (Fuxi & Nuwa in most Chinese versions)
* select pair survives in a boat or gourd (Zhuang version)
* similarity of names (Nuwa, Noah, Nu, Manu, Oannes, etc.)
* rebuilding humanity after devastation(explicitly described)
* colorful heavenly object (5 colored pillar)
It is the oldest book on earth and still enjoys astounding popularity today.
It is actually a 3000 year old digital computer.
Confucious the Chinese Sage used it.
It was the worlds first Psychic Hot Line.
One researcher believes that it predicts the end of civilization, in the year 2012.
It was the worlds first communist doctrine.
I believe that the Yin, Yang concept was developed from it.
I believe it works because it contains posthypnotic suggestions.
It's 64 ancient symbols are written in modern day computer language.
Many believe that this ancient oracle is actually a bridge to the spirit world.
The I Ching code may be a link to our extraterrestrial ancestors
The I Ching concept was 4000 years old when it was first printed, 3000 years ago
Both were responsible for re-building human civilization.
Gilgamesh is awesome to perfection. It was he who opened the mountain passes, who dug wells on the flank of the mountain. It was he who crossed the ocean, the vast seas, to the rising sun, who explored the world regions, seeking life. It was he who reached by his own sheer strength Utanapishtim, the Faraway, who restored the sanctuaries (or: cities) that the Flood had destroyed! ... for teeming mankind.
***
Details of the Nuwa flood stories clearly share commonalities with other Global Deluge traditions, and are worthy of note:
* global flood or calamity (Gong Gongs destrucion)
* destruction of humanity and animals (explicitly described)
* select pair survives calamity (Fuxi & Nuwa in most Chinese versions)
* select pair survives in a boat or gourd (Zhuang version)
* similarity of names (Nuwa, Noah, Nu, Manu, Oannes, etc.)
* rebuilding humanity after devastation(explicitly described)
* colorful heavenly object (5 colored pillar)
who restored the sanctuaries (or: cities) that the Flood had destroyed!
Originally posted by EdenKaia
His point was that Gilgamesh was not responsible for re-building human civilization. If you follow the myth you've been quoting, Utnapishtim, his wife, and the vaguely named others in the ship with them were the only ones to survive the flood. It was they who rebuilt human civilization, not Gilgamesh, who lived centuries after the flood was supposed to have happened.
Now, if you mean that he rebuilt civilization by forcing his people to construct large and encompassing structures such as temples and long stretching walls, then on that note you would be right,...to a certain extent.
...you can only conclude that these structures he built were limited to Uruk, or biblical Erech. This is hardly "human civilization".
Your quote:
who restored the sanctuaries (or: cities) that the Flood had destroyed!
Read this again in context. It is saying that Gilgamesh found Utnapishtim. Utnapishtim, who restored the sanctuaries....etc. It does not state that Gilgamesh restored anything. And regardless which source for the Epic you use, you will never find one claiming that Gilgamesh rebuilt human civilization.
Hope that helps to clear things up for you!
Gilgamesh is awesome to perfection.
It was he who opened the mountain passes,
who dug wells on the flank of the mountain.
It was he who crossed the ocean, the vast seas, to the rising sun,
who explored the world regions, seeking life.
It was he who reached by his own sheer strength
Utanapishtim, the Faraway,
who restored the sanctuaries (or: cities) that the Flood had destroyed!
... for teeming mankind.
It was he who reached by his own sheer strength Utanapishtim, the Faraway, who restored the sanctuaries (or: cities) that the Flood had destroyed!
Originally posted by Marduk
but then it is the akkadian version of a sumerian tale
maybe you should read the source before you start making claims for a fictional character who didn't actually exist
just a suggestion