posted on Sep, 30 2006 @ 02:14 PM
I want to examine something....and i want to do it in an adult manner with nobody turning this into a "race war" thread. I've notice a pattern from
a lot of the people who don't belive the official 9-11 story. I may just be paranoid, but i dont think i am. I want to explore the possibilty that
one of the reasons people wont accept the official story is due to the fact that the hijackers race, and global heritage prevents people from taking
i honestly think the reason people want to believe it's usa gov..and forgive me if this is racist......but *some* white people can't stand the fact
that some mid east "dune dwellers" foiled them. look at tim mcgvey....he blew up a building with the help of 1 other man....yet nobody questions
that AT ALL. ATS has conspirocys dating back to the 1900's, but nobody seems to question the oklahoma bombing..wich personally (even though i BELIVE
mcvey DID do it almost alone..) lends itself to WAY more conspirocy than 9-11.
alright i said a lot lets pick this apart for real........Ok, first the OK bombing.....it's true that mcvey and his accomplice were the only 2 people
ever charged and convicted of the bombing. i think there might have been 1 other person...but forgive me these events took place over 10 years ago my
memory is a little fuzzy.
Ok so 2 men from the south, effectivley blew up a government office building using fertilizer and other materials found in the home. However, nobody
ever questioned this. nobody every questioned how 2 men could kill over 100 people and blow up a 10 (15 maybe) story office building. That is no small
task. And to do it with matierals found in the home is genious. Now these men were white...and from the south....obviously that shouldn't have
anything to do with their capabilities...but think about the standard stereotypical immage of a white southern man. Usually a beer sluggin, uneducated
"hillbilly" comes to mind. Obvsiouly this does not represent the south as a whole, but it is relavent when we assume (according to some) that the
9-11 hijackers were just some "cave dwelling men with plastic boxcutters".
So mcvey and his friend are sentaced, and everyone wants justice so they kill mcvey. Indeed he was different because he had time to give interviews in
jail and we got to see the type of person he was.
But let's apply 9-11 propaganda logic to this with this fictional statement from a fictional OK disbeliever: "You expect me to belive that some
hillbilly and his hick friend blew up a federal office building with a homemade bomb, that's perposterous!"
Now you see where i'm going with this thread?
I want if we could, to maybe apply this logic to the 9-11 hijackers. because it seems a lot of the time when it comes to the question of "how did a
handful of men" hijack planes, it seems as if people always resort to name calling and INSIST on using some kind of propaganda like "cave dwelling"
or somehting like that. And if u need proof, just look at some posts throuought this site..or better yet, look for that video of that scientist on
Hanity and Combs who says almost word for word "YOU REALLY EXPECT ME TO BELIVE THAT 19 ARAB MEN FROM A CAVE HIJACKED A PLANE AND CRASHED IT INTO THE
Lets ask ourselves...who said they lived in a cave? Nobody has proof that these men spent their lives living inside some cave in afganastan. Nobody
has proof to refute the fact that these were COLLEGE EDUCATED MEN and had IMMENSE KNOWLEDGE (espcially of flight/flying)
I feel that the assumption that "19 arab men with boxcutters couldn't have done it" is FALSE and downright RACIST.
i dont mean to offend, but after seeing this pattern appear so many times in so many diffference places, i feel it's time to address this dirty
please be civil people, this is not an attack on race. i'm trying to expose what i feel to be real propaganda and racism here. and obviously u dont
have to be white to be racist toward arabs.....