Chairman of missing and exploited Childrens Caucus resigns

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Oct, 2 2006 @ 09:28 PM
link   
Lazurus, not that I doubt your conclusions, but what search terms did you use?
I wanted to check another search engine that sometimes gets good hits.

Incidents like this latest scandal make me wonder if all those tinfoil stories about an underground pedophile network involving the government could be true.




posted on Oct, 2 2006 @ 10:33 PM
link   
Thats what kept ringin in my mind Lazarus. the Grolsch/Gannon thing keeps ringing louder and louder. I came across the Grolsch thing long before the gannon story broke. Looking into some corrupt government child porn kidnappings.



posted on Oct, 3 2006 @ 12:33 PM
link   
I managed to find several more websites carrying the Gannon scandal, but none of the MSM sites...

This time i used Yahoo, and "GANNON WHITE HOUSE PORN SCANDAL FRANKLIN"
and it showed all search words were being used (in censored searches, you can see that certain search words are not included on the top of the search page, in underlined text.)

it came up with several blogs, a few political "news sites" and a couple of totally unrelated websites, that just use those keywords to get traffic.

It looks like the republican approach of "at least we bring these things out of the closet, and dont hide them" isn't working...

Dennis Hastert seems to have kyboshed that idea, with his preknowledge...

so basically... they claim innocence, until proven guilty, then they claim ignorance, then they claim... what? that they were of legal age, so therefore not a crime...

It will be interesting to see what the spin doctors come up with...
anyone else feel an imminent terrorist threat?
the October surprise that everyone fears?

If they follow Clintons example, a small country somewhere will be pre-emptively bombed...
And Gannon will supply the story that it was because yellow cake uranium was bought there...

(i didn't realize that the Iraq- terrorism- yellow cake story was Gannons, until just today...)



posted on Oct, 3 2006 @ 12:55 PM
link   

In the Franklin Coverup Scandal of 1989, Paul A. Bonacci claimed that he had been kidnapped and flown to the Grove by Republican leader Lawrence King and was forced into sexual acts with other boys. In a later lawsuit claiming that Paul Bonacci was the subject of mind control experiments, Bonacci testified to these and other charges in court with U.S. Senior District Judge Warren Urbom presiding. Bonacci was awarded $1 million by Judge Urbom in a default judgement, but the judge did not find that the allegations were true.[3] A grandjury investigated the claims in the Franklin Coverup Scandal. On July 23, 1990, after hearing many hours of testimony, the grand jury threw out all of the allegations concerning sexual abuse, labeling the charges a "carefully crafted hoax".

en.wikipedia.org...

I pull this from wikipedia.......Anyone want to trace some connections to these names and fast forward 2003-2006 and see who's names are connected to who? If we get some more folks in on this we might be able to put some ink to paper on who might be involved and covering whoms tail sides?





[edit on 3-10-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]



posted on Oct, 3 2006 @ 08:51 PM
link   



posted on Oct, 3 2006 @ 09:04 PM
link   
Thanks for the link.
I can edit it into your post


And, you may be intresting in this thread
www.abovetopsecret.com...



posted on Oct, 3 2006 @ 09:12 PM
link   
Man this is such Crap!!!


Meanwhile, Florida newspapers — who were leaked copies of the e-mail with the Louisiana boy last year — defended their decision not to run stories. Both The St. Petersburg Times and The Miami Herald were given copies of the e-mail, as were other news organizations, including Fox News.

"Our decision at the time was ... that because the language was not sexually explicit and was subject to interpretation, from innocuous to 'sick,' as the page characterized it, to be cautious," said Tom Fiedler, executive editor of the Herald. "Given the potentially devastating impact that a false suggestion of pedophilia could have on anyone, not to mention a congressman known to be gay, and lacking any corroborating information, we chose not to do a story."


2 Florida Newspapers AND Fox(faux) News knew about it. Instead of doing some, oh i dont know, journalistic investigation(god forbid) they decided to not run the story due to lack of evidence. GIVE ME A FREAKIN BREAK. The list of people coddling this sick Frak is getting longer each day. How much u wanna bet they got some peddies in their midst also. Or maybe the owner of all 3 of them is a sick frak just like Foley is.

Source of Info

Edited for Source Link

[edit on 3-10-2006 by S1LV3R4D0]

[edit on 3-10-2006 by DontTreadOnMe]



posted on Oct, 4 2006 @ 04:57 AM
link   
Foley is now claiming that he is a Gay man and was the victim of abuse as a child by a Priest. I can't say for sure that its not true , as more then likely the priest that will be accused and attributed to this mans mental problems is probably dead and buried and will be unable to defend himself. It just sounds like a cop out.



Pie



posted on Oct, 4 2006 @ 07:23 PM
link   
Now, it really gets weird!

Drudge is reporting that one of the accusers was 18 years old at the time of the exchange.
It's just a headline right now, but go check it out..

[edit on 4-10-2006 by spacedoubt]



posted on Oct, 15 2006 @ 10:51 AM
link   
I am guessing that for every one Mark Foley that we hear about there are several others doing the same thing and we will never hear about it.

How many others are pretending to make laws? How many others are in high positions?

When stories like the Franklin cover up come out, average people just don't want to hear it, and why should they. The fact that law makers, judges and others in such positions are the ones having sex with children?

If Priest can be doing this to kids in mass numbers and getting away with it for years without getting caught, then why not people in politics? Why not lawyers and judges?

In fact Priests were so good at this and got away with this, because they were considered above reproach for such things, the same way politians are, and people just don't want to see such things. It's the same thing all over again.

Just like these scandles rocked the catholic church, cause enough people came forward, and were believed, these stories would rock your politics and legal system if the truth ever became known, and the truth is I just don't think that people want to know the truth, I don't think that they can handle the truth.

I beileve what they are saying about these pedophile rings and who is running them, but the truth will probably never come out. Like I said recently else where, what better way to cover up a crime than to make sure that you are the one investigating it.



posted on Oct, 15 2006 @ 01:08 PM
link   
I think that's gross and wrong. That's terrible! Hypocrite!

Man, what is this country becoming?





new topics
 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join