Evidence that mapping and imagery “ tampering “ is often nothing of the sort
i was unsure where this should go - as it touches on Area 51 , and aliens / UFO , even space exploration - so i figured putting it here will be best
Hi – I often get a bee in my bonnet on the topic of image “ tampering “ and the refusal of those who claim it is deliberate acts to “ hide
moon bases “ and such to review the other available imagery of the same locations honestly to check if the other available images show anything
Thus I am please to report that a bit of idle exploration on the www.google.com...
" target="_blank" class="postlink" rel="nofollow">Google mars resource rewarded me with clear
evidence that 2 different cameras record 2 different “ anomalies “ and the possible allegation of “ tampering “ while filming the same
Here is my evidence , The visible and IR feeds of the same location [ see the two features bottom right ]
Viewed in isolation – either photo could be taken as evidence of “ tampering “ but viewed together its clear that no such shenanigans have
occurred – there is nothing to hide
Alas , I cannot find any way of extracting location / co ordinate info from Google mars , so you only have my word that the images are of exactly the
same location with only the “ visible “ and “ infra red “ view toggled
Also Google mars is a composite of various mission data – so its almost impossible to verify where the data was sourced from
Sometimes the same platform has multiple cameras images at differing resolutions , these generate
The field of view may be different , and also the “ angle of attack “ can change – as can absolute altitude
That it is perfectly possible that to photograph a 10km * 10km area , ne camera on the same platform may take 5 shors , another 25
This is something to bear in mind
Lastly – tiling and producing mosaics from photographs is not
a simple exercise of sticking them edge to edge , in the correct order , Each
image must be distorted intentionally to produce a composite image . This review
the software required illustrates this ,
Of course there are some anomalies That appears to be willfull tampering , The
Google earth obfuscation of an civil airport
, spotted by planesman – is a
case in point .
But – as has been said repeatedly there are often multiple images of the same locale , taken with different systems – and the fact that the
anomalies only appears on one of them should alert the honest researcher to the obvious conclusion that the anomalies is not tampering / hiding
something – but simple code or tiling errors or damage to original film stock .
So before crying foul – it’s a good idea to check all available amagery of the area in question .
Because , to state the obvious – if you can show that an anomolie exists on multiple images – then you have strong evidence that there is actually
something “ on the ground “ at the location in question