This topic is in the Aircraft Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


A waste of effort




Topic started on 25-9-2006 @ 05:25 PM by waynos


I have just, by coincidence been reading about two different aircraft projects which saw prototypes being completed, but then never flown.

The ones I read of were the Yak 1000, which couldn't fly, and the Dornier 728, which never got the chance to try.

This reminded me of the Rockwell XFV-12 which, like the Yak, was incapable of lifting itself off the ground and I wonder if anyone can name any more planes which, after all the effort, and expense, of designing them and building a prototype, never made it into the air at all?

Over to you guys.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 25-9-2006 @ 05:32 PM by masqua


Good thread, waynos...I was all ready to jump on this with the Avro Arrow, but it did actually fly and was dropped because of political stupidity.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-9-2006 @ 02:56 AM by waynos


Yeah. that's the different angle I was aiming for here, there have been so many interesting design projects that were never built and so many fascinating prototypes that were wasted, such as the Arrow and TSR 2, there can't be too many that fall in between and were actually built without flying. Surely the three I named in the opening post can't be the only ones?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-9-2006 @ 04:25 AM by kojac


external image


The Lockheed company was the first in the USA to start work on a jet powered aircraft, the L-133 design started in 1939 as a number of "Paper Project" by engineers Clarence R "Kelly" Johnson and Hall J Hibbard. .


Scrapped for the P-80 Shooting star..



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-9-2006 @ 04:50 AM by Silentvulcan


How about the Miles M52? It beleive it was built but was scrapped before it could be flown as it was considered by the UK government of the time to be too dangerous for the pilot......however a lot of its design ideas were ....ahem....borrowed for the Bell X1.

A few years later a scale model of the M52 was built and launched and apperently exceeded mach 1 before it was lost....so history might have been different if the real M52 had flown.......good old labour government strikes again!!!!!!!!!

SV......Out!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-9-2006 @ 05:08 AM by waynos


Yes, I suppose part built aircraft count too, in which case the M.52 is a good one, in fact the model M.52 reached mach 1.6, or 1,000 mph. Considering it was to have its own undercarriage, take off under its own power like a normal plane, and use the worlds first afterburning jet engine as opposed to the X-1's rocket, its even more of a shame as it would have (most likely) beat the X-1 into a cocked hat.

Still, 'coulda, woulda, shoulda' isn't quite the same as 'did'.

I can add the Supermarine 545, a supersonic fighter in the F-100/MiG 19 class which was complete and ready for flight when axed in 1955 and the Hawker P.1121, a mach 2 multirole fighter of similar size and weight to the F-105 which was also canned with the prototype virtually complete two years later in 1957.

The L133 doesn't count as it was never built but at least the US seems to actually fly the ones it does build.

[edit on 26-9-2006 by waynos]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-9-2006 @ 09:25 AM by ignorant_ape


i will have to look up exactly what i reffer to , but my sunmission has to be an italian " flying boat " to use the term loosely

the name was something like " capagnini "

and it looked like a garden shed with wings [ and chinz curtains in the windows ]

if you see a picture , you will just giggle -- its that bad



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 26-9-2006 @ 09:30 AM by waynos


I know the one you mean, it was the Caproni Ca 60 and a description of it from the time said "it wouldn't have looked out of place sailing up Plymouth Sound with the Spanish Armada".

Sadly it disqualifies itself from this list by actually hauling its sorry arse into the sky, briefly.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-3-2007 @ 10:22 AM by waynos


Found another entry for this long dormant thread.

The Tarrant Tabor was a huge triplane strategic bomber built towards the end of the 1st world war, it doesn't look too bad with its curvaceous fuselage which looks very modern for the time. Hopwever its fatal flaw was its arrangement of the engines in a 'square' around the fuselage. On its first ever take off attempt it pitched forward and nosed over as the upper two engines were run up to full power, the Tabor nosed over killing both pilots

The designer Walter Barling did learn from his mistake however as, after emigrating to the USA after the war he successfully flew a revamped derivative of the Tabor called the Whittman-Lewis Barling Bomber.

external image

external image

external image



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 24-3-2007 @ 12:29 PM by Zaphod58


An aircraft in the sense that it was supposed to fly, but not a traditional plane. The XF5U1 flying disk. It was a smaller version of the V-173 which made over 100 successful flights. By the time the XF5U1 prototypes were completed the war was over and the USN was back to more "traditional" designs.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

















ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

(no tags)
















ATS Server: www3.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.081 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread