So it might as well be me, I've always been good at it here............ ( ready Mods?
Your completely illogical and highly dysfunctional encryptic language has far exceeded any rational thought processes required to formulate proper
Your posts, for the most part, come across as utter nonsense with strong attitudes of holier than thou faery fluff
when you do make a
Beyond that, your writing style of two or three words per sentence ( which seems to be a code that only you have the key to )
, seem to
contribute nothing but the need to scroll several times through a page in hopes of inevitably getting to the end of clusters of chaotic sentence
structure that have no grammatical merit whatsoever.
Mind you, this is not a lack of reader comprehension, as it is quite apparent I am educated, this is, a lack of author discernment to post thoughts
within the confines of expected literacy correlating to the genre of the forum which one is a member of.
Is it not possible, to simply ..................... talk?
Ok Mods, rip in !!! whohoo !
Crap, forgot to throw in the thread pertinant comment, you know the one, the lame attempt at saving hide for having just thrown poo at someone
Of what I have read, conversed of, etc, I think that there are too many relevant findings in the Bible code scenario to not give attention to it
(*not claiming the Bible is as professed; *agree the codes decyphered must come from the original writings
). I also believe in all the
findings of codes in other books. I see these two factions, as it were, arguing against each other that each is wrong - is it not possible that the
Bible codes do, in fact, have plausible arguments of its containing codes, AND
have codes found in other books?
[edit on 2/10/06 by Misfit]