Get real dude! If you cannot offer a better explanation for the evidence being presented, then have the common sense to say nothing and hope nobody
pays attention. At least this avenue affords me far less of an opportunity to shine the light of suspicion on you and everyone else “denying,
denying, denying” my explanations. Since your position in this debate is being shown to be weak, feeble and even nonexistent, then your best ploy
is to simply go away; because you and I know for certain you NEVER intend on offering a single explanation for the mounting pile of evidence that DOES
support my original “Missile” premise. People running Sites like this ( www.oilempire.us...
) have taken the time to
gather and weigh all the evidence in this case with eyes focused on the “Big Oil,” the “Homeland Security Police” and “Economic Warfare”
and most importantly the “War Game Exercises” ( www.oilempire.us...
= Michael Rupert’s work) coefficients intact. Mr.
WithoutEqual’s notion of evidence is “deny, deny, deny,” while offering nothing in the way of evidence at all.
WithoutEqual >> While you folks debated every single point in the JFK case that either didn't matter, or couldn't be proven, the murderers
got off scott free. YOU HEAR ME NOW? THIS TYPE OF DEBATE, THE WAY YOU GUYS APPROACH THESE THINGS HELPS THE BAD GUYS MORE THAN YOU HURT
No sir. Who are you pointing to being the ‘bad guys?’ Are you now trying to prop up the official ‘cover story,’ by intimating that “Osama
Did It,” or are you officiating over the “deny, deny, deny” agenda of a true DoD operative?? What reasonable ATS member who simply disagrees
with my “Missile” explanations is going to start ranting about JFK and other totally unrelated cases? Does he know the same people who murdered
JFK are also responsible for the 9/11 attacks? Hmmmm . . . The plot thickens . . .
Without >> THAT'S WHY AFTER ALL THESE YEARS THE JFK MURDER IS STILL UNSOLVED, AND THAT'S WHY IF I VISITED THIS SITE IN 10 YEARS I'LL SEE
YOU SAME PEOPLE, DEBATING THE SAME EXACT THING OVER, AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN. ENJOY GOING NOWHERE WITH YOUR CAUSE.
WithoutEqual appears to be having a hyperactive reaction to the mounting “Missile Attack” evidence being presented in this case, which seems odd
for a fellow having no explanations of his very own. Some of us already know the enemy and the methods and devices of his trickery, deception and
agenda. WithoutEqual seems very afraid of others coming to the same knowledge, which would make his superiors down at headquarters very unhappy
indeed. He knows like I do that the evidence in this investigation leads to much more than just an explanation of what happened at the Pentagon on
9/11. You can bet the house that the nearer we get to a full explanation of the evidence in this case, that Mr. Deny here will be using more and more
CAPS revealing his own anxiety and frustration! Why should our resident DoD operative (the jury is still out) feel any disquieting anxiousness at all
in this debate? He has not even presented a theory of his own for anyone to adopt or even begin to offer arguments against. This is the sign and
tactic of a pawn towing the line for some other principal or agenda, under the pretense of a public safety announcement. All I see in this guy is
someone sinking even more quickly in the quicksand of his own futile ranting.
Without >> Oh and one more thing. When someone disagrees with you, or says your evidence will take you nowhere,
and you call them an intel agent it kills you're legitimacy to a point where most people won't take anything you say seriously.
Heh . . . Really? If I were trying to characterize your flimsy and even surprising testimony as that of an ‘Intelligence Agent,’ then my first
order of business would be to prove your case has some sign of being Intelligent. However, I cannot honestly point to that kind of evidence, because
your ranting does not include any explanation of the facts AT ALL. An ‘intelligent’ adversary in this debate would be armed with something much
more substantial than ANYTHING you have to add to this topic. The Bush Administration has handled their part in the cover up like a bunch of country
bumpkins who could not find their backside with both hands on a clear day. They have failed to surround themselves with anything resembling
‘intelligent’ advisors, which looks more like a ‘who’s who’ of NWO puppets and proxies than anything else; willing to run over Bush like a
redheaded stepchild (no offense; Heh, you now what I’m driving at). I am happy to allow those willing to wear the ATS Investigator cap AND our
third party judges in this debate to weigh all the evidence and draw their own conclusions. If they are moved by your lack of evidence and ranting,
then they had little desire to know ‘the truth’ on this matter anyway. I appreciate your diversionary tactics, because that will weed out the
wishy-washy types with no stomach for this kind of investigation. God knows we do not need their whining along with yours . . .
Without >> So you can thank yourself, for shooting yourself, and your cause in the foot. Which makes me wonder, what's your agenda, who do
you work for?
I serve “The Truth, The Whole Truth And Nothing But The Truth” on this or any topic I feel compelled to write about. This case and the WTC – 7
collapse ( 911research.wtc7.net...
) represent the two smoking guns leading straight back to the true
terrorists, who like “The Truth” remains very much “At Large.”
Without >> Cause statements like your's show desperation, and immaturity which hurt your cause more than a DoD operative ever could. Makes it
alot easier to call people a bunch of tinfoil hat wearing kids. You are, your own worst enemy.
Heh . . . Really? For your information, my kids have kids of their own and ‘your’ side of this debate his no evidence to offer and no explanation
for what did happen to WTC-7 or the Pentagon on 9/11. I got up this morning in anticipation of answering your thoughtful replies to my three part
post to you yesterday. However, I was met with disappointment because you obviously have no reply at all. What is WithoutEqual’s explanation of
the evidence for what happened at the Pentagon on 9/11??
GL in the Debate,