It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


"Invisible posts" by staff

page: 2
<< 1   >>

log in


posted on Sep, 27 2006 @ 07:11 PM

Originally posted by marg6043
Oh well, and I though they were secret messages between moderators that only moderators could see.

>>okay, guys, now we'll have to bump her off!

posted on Sep, 27 2006 @ 07:13 PM
Love Will Find A Way

Originally posted by dgtempe
Well, i love ya, if it makes any difference.

And I know folks here respect you. I know i do.


Well I wuv you too, you know.

But now I've lost my golden opportunity to post this...

“I don’t get no respect!”

[edit on 9/27/2006 by Majic]

posted on Sep, 27 2006 @ 08:49 PM

Really I am not joking, for a while that is what I thought, that it was messages that only moderations could see.

Then somebody told me what it was
or that is what I thought.

Now I will not be surprised about the subliminal messages.

Because if you got by the post numbers of some members here (including me) this board is either addicting or we have been subliminally brainwashed.

posted on Sep, 28 2006 @ 11:39 AM
While we are on the topic of the "hot list" and bumping to get posts to appear...

What the heck is up with the trashed thread ""
That i keep seeing appear?

if it is trashed, then why does it keep popping up?
if it is because the mods are looking at it again, then why was it trashed in the first place? it obviously holds legitimate interest, or mods wouldn't be bumping it...

posted on Sep, 28 2006 @ 11:40 AM
you all censored the word in the center of those eclipses...
what is wrong with posting the word "war n ing"?

or is it something wrong with posting the reference to that trashed thread?

posted on Sep, 28 2006 @ 11:54 AM
Dude, hit your "QUOTE" button and you'll see it. The BBC makes anything you enclose in a invisible automatically.

Just sayin'.

[EDIT to ADD] that's BBC as in Bulletin Board Code, not British Broadcasting Company. Although come to think of it...

[edit on 9/28/2006 by yeahright]

posted on Sep, 28 2006 @ 12:11 PM
I thought that was how the original trashed thread was titled...
with the elipses...
another board friend noted that it might be a mod renamed thread, that was titled to make it easier to refer back to, in case it was needed for reference later...

Dunno... but the censor effect presently seems to be solved...
thanks yeah right... I appreciate the help...

But what is the deal with the re-appearing "warning" thread?
does it merit interest enough to keep bumping?


posted on Oct, 2 2006 @ 11:50 AM
Man, there is never any cool super secret around here.

Springer, SO and Simon aren't cointelpro government agents. The RATS Forum has awesome threads but none contain super secret information and now you tell me there are no super secret invisible posts by staff members. Gee, thanks guys!

new topics

top topics

<< 1   >>

log in