Originally posted by Unright
All I got to say is, what every gets you there man. Of course the questions don't stop with demolitions. Then you goot ask how, when, who. But one
step at a time.
Right. I don't even want to hear anything about Islamics planting bombs when people start realizing the unlikelihood of a natural collapse.
Why would terrorists plant explosives and not want us to know about it? Why did "Osama" allegedly not expect them to fall, as "he" has stated?
Why would government agencies cover up evidence of explosives if terrorists had done it?
How would terrorists gain the approporiate security clearances? Marvin Bush was a head of the security company, not OBL.
How and why would they have managed such a perfect implosion of WTC7, so much later in the afternoon?
And if Islamics planted the explosives, you'd think they'd be a little cocky about it afterwards, and even design the demolitions so that they were
OBVIOUSLY demolitions, as in "in your face" kind of thing, as the planes allegedly were. Instead, you had two buildings destroyed in what
appeared to be a very sophisticated and utterly destructive manner, making the buildings appear to fall straight down without losing force, while
completely destroying virtually everything in the buildings but the steel.
I honestly think that the opinion that the buildings could have fallen naturally, is more logical than the opinion than OBL and gang planted
explosives and is just keeping it hush hush, and having NIST and FEMA cover it up for them.
[edit on 22-9-2006 by bsbray11]