It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New Video: 9/11 Mysteries

page: 19
2
<< 16  17  18    20 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 28 2006 @ 07:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by cybertroy
Thanks "In nothing we trust" for the links. So we've got bankers, NWO, but heck, we have mention of NWO in the bible. This rabbit hole sure is deep.

Troy



Hebrews 9:10
They are only a matter of food and drink and various ceremonial washings—external regulations applying until the time of the new order.

bibleresources.bible.com...


Indeed




posted on Nov, 29 2006 @ 01:01 AM
link   
Seems like somebody(s) wants to control us or something. I wonder how long they have wanted this?

Troy



posted on Nov, 29 2006 @ 01:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by cybertroy
Seems like somebody(s) wants to control us or something. I wonder how long they have wanted this?

Troy


Hard to tell



posted on Dec, 1 2006 @ 02:08 AM
link   
This is my first post here but I have been reading this site and others for a while.

I do believe this is the best documentary thus far. I am impressed with its overall temprate mood. Being that it is not fanatical in its approach, makes it much more easy to show to people who would other wise not watch so called "conspiracy" documentaries.

thanks for the video.

[edit on 1-12-2006 by jaydelay]



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 08:20 PM
link   
This movie is no way near proof beyond doubt, there is still alot of conjecture (although this could be the film-makers desired method). I don't see how it is alot better than Loose Change. I nearly stopped watching halfway through because of the incosistencies in their arguments. What stood out was the still molten metal after 3 weeks, the collapse of WTC7 compared to WTC3-6 and the near impossibility of fire being able to cause the collapse of WTC 1 and 2. Mysteries clearly implies who they think was behind the CD of the WTC, although I'm still to watch the 2nd and 3rd installments.

This is what makes me scratch my head. Why haven't we seen groups collecting signatures or parading the streets of NY demanding the truth? If the official stories are a load of rubbish, and the American Government is in some way to blame for the WTCs destruction, then it proves to me that actions speak louder than words, so it is actions that will get results rather than words or movies.

Edit: I suppose there could have been organised petitions for the truth that hadn't been covered by the media, and if that's the case I'd like any links to how they did. Cheers


[edit on 4/12/06 by byhiniur]



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 08:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by byhiniur
This movie is no way near proof beyond doubt, there is still alot of conjecture (although this could be the film-makers desired method). I don't see how it is alot better than Loose Change. I nearly stopped watching halfway through because of the incosistencies in their arguments. What stood out was the still molten metal after 3 weeks, the collapse of WTC7 compared to WTC3-6 and the near impossibility of fire being able to cause the collapse of WTC 1 and 2. Mysteries clearly implies who they think was behind the CD of the WTC, although I'm still to watch the 2nd and 3rd installments.

This is what makes me scratch my head. Why haven't we seen groups collecting signatures or parading the streets of NY demanding the truth? If the official stories are a load of rubbish, and the American Government is in some way to blame for the WTCs destruction, then it proves to me that actions speak louder than words, so it is actions that will get results rather than words or movies.

Edit: I suppose there could have been organised petitions for the truth that hadn't been covered by the media, and if that's the case I'd like any links to how they did. Cheers


[edit on 4/12/06 by byhiniur]


I am not sure if I am not understand you. Are you saying that "TRUTH" is discovered by how many people are trying uncover the truth? If there isn't very many looking, then it cannot be true?



posted on Dec, 4 2006 @ 10:27 PM
link   
Basically, if we are to take it as fact that 9/11 wasn't caused by Al-Queda, then what can be done about/has something been done about it to bring the real purpetrators to justice.



posted on Dec, 5 2006 @ 01:51 PM
link   
I have always said this, and I will say it again. Our biggest enemy is our own Government. Just as our men and woman were sacrificed on the home land, now they are being sacrificed on a foreign land, all for big bussiness. If these sept 11 videos are true, then the United States is not at war, we invaded and colasped a nation. This was great a video. I'm convinced.



posted on Dec, 15 2006 @ 05:05 AM
link   
Let me just say that like so many others, I will never forget that horrific day. I was on days off from work visiting my parents when my mom woke me up and told me the wtc and pentagon were hit by planes. Honestly, I thought her and dad were watching a movie, but when i had the t.v remote thrown at me and I turned on my t.v, just as the picture came into focus, i saw footage of the second plane hitting the second tower. I shot out of bed like you wouldnt believe. From that day on, those images were burned into my mind. Every time I think about it, I get a lump in my throat and my eyes water, and then the white hot anger begins to set in. God Bless.



posted on Dec, 16 2006 @ 11:24 AM
link   
Dear Miya

I totally agree with you. You have posted the most truth i have ever heard.

================================================
with best regards,

OIM



posted on Dec, 16 2006 @ 11:53 AM
link   

USA Today
August 4, 2006
Pg. 9

FAA, Pentagon Reports Due On 9/11 Response


Five years after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, investigators are still looking into the government's response to determine why aviation and military officials' accounts of their performancethat day don't match recorded accounts by other government officials of the events as they unfolded.

Members of the government's 9/11 Commission, which investigated the attacks and the response, requested the investigations.

The Defense Department inspector general will soon release a report on whether the military's testimony to thecommission was "knowingly false," said Lt. Col. Brian Maka, a Pentagon spokesman.

TheTransportation Department inspector general is finishing a report on whether Federal Aviation Administration officials misspoke in their testimony, said David Barnes, the inspector general's spokesman.

The FAA and defense officials have corrected some information originally given to the 9/11 Commission, such as the exact times the FAA notified the military of the hijackings, and the military's assertion that it was tracking one of the planes and intended to intercept it when, in fact, the plane had already crashed.



posted on Dec, 16 2006 @ 02:32 PM
link   
9/11 Mysteries has what got me started in terms of looking more critically at not only the government but also the world around me. When a friend of mine brought the dvd to me to watch, I did not know what to think. In all honesty, I had not thought much at all about alternate theories to 9/11 and was not really sure what to think of such things.

I feel that 9/11 Mysteries brings up some really good questions. While I think the U.S. governement may have been involved, I know others may not think so. However, there were too many odd events that occurred on that day as well as the months before and after.

9/11 Mysteries was a gateway for me to other documentaries, not only about 9/11 but also about the U.S. government as well as other governments. As I have watched them, I have become more and more concerned.

9/11 Mysteries is the documentary I try to show people first when I bring this topic up. I think it brings up questions and good discussion in a more direct way without too much rhetoric.


fsd

posted on Dec, 27 2006 @ 04:26 PM
link   
told my dad
he watched it and is speding the word
it is quite interesting



posted on Jan, 5 2007 @ 09:26 PM
link   
What i really want to know is why the WTC's why not empire state building or statue of lib. or more than one aircraft at Penatgon, better still why the United States. And if there were explosions why were the bomb-sniffing dogs be removed from detail the day before.

CDT SENATOR
AAFC 4WG
Australia



posted on Jan, 6 2007 @ 06:43 PM
link   
wow what a awesome doc... I'm new to this but have had some doubt, this video makes it easy to believe the worst. As with any subject picking it apart and sharing the dirt can make almost anything look bad. However, the scientific reasoning behind this film leaves if very heard to doubt.

here are some of my questions:

what if any investigations:
have gone into securacom?
the lease holder of the porperty?
uprgading the internet wiring? when was that last done?
who gave the go ahed to release people back into the tower?
why didn't the treat it the same way as wtc7?

There are some many more that I will hope to find anwers to in the near future. I guess I looking for any responses on "911we know" but the other side. Can they hold the answers to the above questions, will the deny that those were squibbs?

Once again great post, video a dn this websitie rocks!!!



posted on Jan, 6 2007 @ 09:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by doctorfungi
I'm not going to pretend I watched the whole thing, I will pick it up tomorrow though...

3am Here :p

Well from what I saw they are just doing the same old CT'er drill. Talk about fire, ignore the fact that planes hit the buildings.

One point they dug themselves into a hole with was showing a few other skyscrappers burning (including the WTC 6 story fire) and then proceeding to ask that was burning during the 9/11 fires. Which ironically would be the same thing burning in all the other sky scrappers + jet fuel.

Another thing that gets me is how they mention 'melting steel'. No one ever said the steel melted. The fire temperatures at the WTC were high enough to weaken steel to 50%. That, along with impact force of the planes plus the weight of the tower above the steel which has been weakened (proven by SEVERAL photographs showing the metal bending) is more than enough reason for the building to collapse.

I'll watch the rest tomorrow but what I've seen so far are just selective camera angles (failing to show angles with clear images of huge inferno's), contradictions of their own points and a whole hell of alot of ignorance.

Let's not forget CT'ers - TWO PLANES HIT THOSE BUILDINGS ON 9/11.

Oh and could they have at least got a better narrator and look into the basics of vocal recording? It's called a pop-filter... not expensive.


Finally someone i agree with! we also have to take into account that buildings that big have never been demolished by controlled demolition, and the biggest one they did implode took MONTHS to get ready, and thats with the building fully evacuated and they had to cut through the steel most of the way through before hand. so far i've watched 8 minutes of this video and i don't think i want to watch the rest, though i probably will anyway.



posted on Jan, 6 2007 @ 09:38 PM
link   


Finally someone i agree with! we also have to take into account that buildings that big have never been demolished by controlled demolition, and the biggest one they did implode took MONTHS to get ready, and thats with the building fully evacuated and they had to cut through the steel most of the way through before hand. so far i've watched 8 minutes of this video and i don't think i want to watch the rest, though i probably will anyway.


THis was by no means a clean demolition either, objects blasting outward. if this was a job they wouldn't make it look like one but cutting steel. I asure you that it is worth watching. Even if only to further back your own idea. Just watch and humor the concept. Watching 8 minutes or reading the first chapter of anything can be very misleading. There is far to much content and questions in this video to not be completed.



posted on Jan, 19 2007 @ 07:03 AM
link   

Originally posted by 911mysteriesguide
www.911mysteriesguide.com...

This movie didn't last long. Nicely debunked.


You should stick around and chat with us, instead of plugging your site and not coming back, like I have a feeling you're going to.



posted on Jan, 19 2007 @ 07:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by lizziex3
Finally someone i agree with! we also have to take into account that buildings that big have never been demolished by controlled demolition, and the biggest one they did implode took MONTHS to get ready, and thats with the building fully evacuated and they had to cut through the steel most of the way through before hand. so far i've watched 8 minutes of this video and i don't think i want to watch the rest, though i probably will anyway.


The only time it takes a long time to demo a building is if your are taking the time to make sure you protect other buildings nearby. If you are not really worried about protecting other buildings it does not take as much time to demo a building.

Why did a firechief who reached the 74th floor report walls had been breached ?


9:48 a.m.

Ladder 15: "Battalion Fifteen to Battalion Seven."
Battalion Seven: "Go Ladder 15."
Ladder 15: "What do you got up there, Chief?"

Battalion Seven Chief: "I'm still in boy stair 74th floor. No smoke or fire problems, walls are breached, so be careful."

Ladder 15: "Yeah Ten-Four, I saw that on 68. Alright, we're on 71 we're coming up behind you."
Battalion Seven Chief: "Ten-four. Six more to go."
Ladder 15: "Let me know when you see more fire."
Battalion Seven Chief: "I found a marshall on 75."



posted on Jan, 19 2007 @ 07:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by lizziex3
Finally someone i agree with! we also have to take into account that buildings that big have never been demolished by controlled demolition, and the biggest one they did implode took MONTHS to get ready, and thats with the building fully evacuated and they had to cut through the steel most of the way through before hand. so far i've watched 8 minutes of this video and i don't think i want to watch the rest, though i probably will anyway.


The only time it takes a long time to demo a building is if your are taking the time to make sure you protect other buildings nearby. If you are not really worried about protecting other buildings it does not take as much time to demo a building.

Why did a firechief who reached the 74th floor and a firemen on the 68th report walls had been breached ?


9:48 a.m.

Ladder 15: "Battalion Fifteen to Battalion Seven."
Battalion Seven: "Go Ladder 15."
Ladder 15: "What do you got up there, Chief?"

Battalion Seven Chief: "I'm still in boy stair 74th floor. No smoke or fire problems, walls are breached, so be careful."

Ladder 15: "Yeah Ten-Four, I saw that on 68. Alright, we're on 71 we're coming up behind you."
Battalion Seven Chief: "Ten-four. Six more to go."
Ladder 15: "Let me know when you see more fire."
Battalion Seven Chief: "I found a marshall on 75."





[edit on 19-1-2007 by ULTIMA1]



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 16  17  18    20 >>

log in

join