It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Freedom_for_sum
And for those who believe the government is behind the 911 attacks AND do nothing legally about it: You are un-American and I'd prefer to not share the same airspace with you. Please do everyone a favor and leave.
Originally posted by Freedom_for_sum
I'm certain, however, that those who seem to automatically be cocked to believe anything anti-Bush administration would see legitmacy in trash like this.
I've said this before: If I found it so easy and reasonable to believe that my government was behind the attacks I would denounce my citizenship and move to another country. My question to those who believe this crap is: Why are you still here?
Originally posted by Slap Nuts
AND watch Lesli TALK.. do you know what a liar looks like when they are talking? Leslie is being VERY evasive when he speaks...
Originally posted by Valhall
I watched intently right up until they said the towers fell in 10 seconds and then showed the seismograph.
Just another notch in what appears to be an endless string of crap. It looks like if these people (and I use that word all encompassing for the myriad of groups and individuals who have done this same thing so far) are going to put in the time, money and effort to do something like this, they'd at least fully research before slapping together a mish-mash of videos and talking bullcrap over the picture.
*sigh*
BUT, I'll continue to give each one of them a try until some one gets it right.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Slap Nuts
AND watch Lesli TALK.. do you know what a liar looks like when they are talking? Leslie is being VERY evasive when he speaks...
If "Leslie" is the engineer who was talking about how they 'forgot' to design for the fuel, I said exactly that to my husband (that he was lying by his body language). When Leslie was explaining that they designed the buildings to withstand the 707 and didn't think about the fuel???
Originally posted by Whiterabbit29
I posted this video over a week ago, and from the response It got I may as well not have bothered
Originally posted by jolly1970
I have an idea. How about a 1/1000th mock up of the site and crash littel planes into it?? I do not have the time nor the mathematical prowess to do such an experiment but I do have the money to fund it. How much different could it be? If everything was to scale. You have one set of buildings with small bombs rigged in them and another set of buildings with nothing. I know there are a billion variables but woudln't this do some good? Maybe we can even have 19 little terrorists!!! Any suggestions?
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
How many engineers had to have been involved in the design of the WTC and how many other engineers did they consult about the aircraft they were designing against... And not ONE of them thought to mention the fuel??? Impossible! Engineers just don't leave out things like that. I've worked with them my whole career and I'm married to one. Their attention to detail is incredible, especially when designing something new, big and exciting.
Originally posted by neformore
Heres some things to ponder on for all the "you couldn't keep that secret" people.
Manhattan Project.
U2 Spyplane
SR71 Spyplane.
F117 Nighthawk
Oh yes, they're all public now, but they weren't at the time, and hundreds of people were involved in each project.
Its not impossible to keep a secret.
Originally posted by grover
all four of those were legitimate government projects with legitimate goals.
Originally posted by grover
all four of those were legitimate government projects with legitimate goals.
But the debate isn't helped by those who insist the towers fell at free fall rate, and erroneous, insistent arguments like that only serve to cloud and cover the anomalies like the one I've described here, providing a convenient strawman for repetitive debunkers to shoot down. And that's one of the many reasons why serious 9/11 researchers are sticklers for accuracy and honesty.