9/11 seems to be the most “holey” official story ever with the cracks turning into gaping holes in inaccuracies, Heres my theeory on how much the
CIA was involved who have “played” on this for the past 5 years.
They have never
attacked Israel despite openly stating their support for Palestine, I mean really how hard can it be to set up a bomb in one of
the most insecure places on Earth.
"Al Qaeda is a radical Sunni Muslim umbrella organization established to recruit young Muslims into the Afghani Mujahideen and is aimed to establish
Islamist states throughout the world, overthrow ‘un-Islamic regimes’, expel US soldiers and Western influence from the Gulf, and capture Jerusalem
as a Muslim city."
Yes that must be the reason their have never
been any Al Qaeda terrorist attacks in Israel. More likely the more than "supportive allies"
America dont want to destroy anything in their very "religiously" significant city.
America stops supporting
the Iranian development of Nuclear power.
Iraqs President Hassan al Bakur
resigns and makes way for Dicator Saddam Hussein
who is funded by America to
the Iraqi people,the Kurds and their "old allies"
Soviets Invade Afghanistan, Bin Laden supports the rebel movement in Afghanistan, they fight off Russian occupation through the CIA
“Bin Laden was, though, a product of a monumental miscalculation by western security agencies. Throughout the 80s he was armed by the CIA and funded
by the Saudis to wage jihad against the Russian occupation of Afghanistan. Al-Qaida, literally "the database", was originally the computer file of
the thousands of mujahideen who were recruited and trained with help from the CIA to defeat the Russians”
Words of Robin Cook, Former Labour politician who was Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs of the United Kingdom and also President
of the Foreign Policy Centre and a vice-president of the America All Party Parliamentary Group and the Global Security and Non-Proliferation All Party
The story about bin Laden and the CIA -- that the CIA funded bin Laden or trained bin Laden -- is simply a folk
myth. There's no evidence of this. In fact, there are very few things that bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri and the U.S. government
agree on. They all agree that they didn't have a relationship in the 1980s. And they wouldn't have needed to. Bin Laden had his own money, he
was anti-American and he was operating secretly and independently.
The real story here is the CIA didn't really have a clue about who this guy was until 1996 when they set up a unit to really start tracking
Words of Peter Bergen, CNN journalist.
So one is directly contradicting what the other said ?who is lying?
Look at the word choice he actually says that they “agree” on “very few things”.
So who would you believe ? A Politician? or a Journalist respectively?
I think ill go with the Politician on this one, this guy did resign in protest at the British decision to invade Iraq.
The other is a Journalist working for the “questionable” CNN.
the ruling to kill the Americans and their allies civilians and military - is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any
country in which it is possible to do it, in order to liberate the al-Aqsa Mosque (in Jerusalem) and the holy mosque (in
Makka) from their grip, and in order for their armies to move out of all the lands of Islam, defeated and unable to threaten any
Muslim. This is in accordance with the words of Almighty Allah, 'and fight the pagans all together as they fight you all together,' and 'fight
them until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah'
Right okay but would it not have been more “successful” had the attacks taken place in Israel? It certainly didn’t help drive them out of the
“lands of Islam”.
For what is supposedly a very intelligent man he isn’t showing a great deal of it, and so far to this day is still contradicting himself.
He would rather attempt the most daring inconceivably hard plot in which he mastermind havng his “fellow” extremists “hijack” 4 planes
crashing them into the WTC and Pentagon with the 4th crashing in a field (Was supposedly destined to hit the White House) respectively.
“According to Waheed Mozhdah, Osama bin Laden wrote a letter two days later to Taliban leader Mullah Omar urging him to attack the Northern
Alliance. In the letter, bin Laden noted that America's failure to respond to the September 11 attacks would signal its end as a
So their saying the “intelligent man” that is Bin Laden thought that by “demolishing” 1civilian populated landmark and crashing another
“plane” into the Pentagon, in the least populated side
where a lot of “renovation work” was going on. Minimising casualties and also
“funnily enough” deciding keep away from the “Top Military chiefs”, And he thought he was going to cripple the worlds most powerful country?
That is an insult to the mans “Intelligience” and the Publics, any attacks like these in reality were only going to do one thing let the companies
and tenants owning the WTC getting massive payments from the Insurance policies which ran into the “Billions“ so whilst they where all pocketing
the hard dough they were already on their way to their next money maker throughMass scare mongering
Al Qaeda: September 11th
Al Qaeda: US targets
Al Qaeda: Soviet Invasion
[edit on 22/9/06 by JAK]