It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
Great photo's! I downloaded the 25mb tif file and the detail is amazing, even though the resolution is only 14 meters per pixel. I think the face and pyramids are totally natural, but the interesting thing is that every rock in the area around the face looks like it was submerged in water. They're islands!
Originally posted by GhostITM
Great photos.......much better than the ones NASA had taken using the Mars Surveyor. Actually even those pics looked doctored compared to these ones. It wouldn't surprise me if NASA did doctor them somewhat...... their photos looked alot rougher than these.
Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe
Great photos! I downloaded the 25mb tif file and the detail is amazing, even though the resolution is only 14 meters per pixel.
Now Way...Your kidding me...Are you saying that these pictures look clearer then the ones Nasa took with its spacecraft thats over a decade old! WOW, I would have never thought that.
Nasa didn't doctor any images, there pics looked "rougher" because they had less detail (per pixel) then this orbiter does.
Nasa will be taking some great pics soon...Its been a long wait, but there new craft: Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), will begin its science portion of the mission in November.
Originally posted by Murcielago
GhostITM - I could list a few possibilities that explain why the pictures dont look as smooth as Mars Express' pics...But they would be just speculation.
Yeah...I guess it sounded a little harsh....But ya often need to talk like that around here, Where its common to run into people who think everything is a conspiracy (IE:moon hoax, Mars face/pyramids, etc.).
Originally posted by looofo
New ESA picts of mars face at cydonia.
Can you still see a face?
Link to ESA
Hope this has not been posted before.
Originally posted by Murcielago
No Way...Your kidding me...Are you saying that these pictures look clearer then the ones Nasa took with its spacecraft thats over a decade old! WOW, I would have never thought that.
Nasa didn't doctor any images, there pics looked "rougher" because they had less detail (per pixel) then this orbiter does.
............
LOL.
Well thats a waste of time and HDD space.
The detail in the 2 images are virtually identical...Your not going to see a better picture when you view the TIFF versus the Jpeg.