It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


The New World As Seen By Hugo Chavez

page: 4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in


posted on Sep, 25 2006 @ 01:35 AM
Before we make any further comments on "Democracy" and "Free" nations, let us all get our facts straight first. I read a comment here that stated "Dictators get their power from the poor" What? You seemed to have lost me there. Dictators are usually brought to power via a coup and by military force. Usually supported by the CIA. The Shah of Iran, Pinochet, Noriega, Batista,Videla, Somoza, Marcos, Suharto....etc and then cease elections.
Chavez was elected, yes elected by the poor of Venezuela. Which happens to be around 80percent of the population. Therefore he was elected by the majority of the people. Which is what a democracy is all about.
As far as lack of freedom of speech in Venezuela, well:
In an editorial on January 14 attacking the government of Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez, the Washington Post wrote, “Mr. Chavez has pushed through a new law that allows the government to fine or shut down private media for vaguely defined offenses against 'public order'.”

That this is not true has not stopped repeated claims in the US media that the “authoritarian” Chavez is attempting to “silence critics”. Such claims have become a standard feature of US media articles about Venezuela.

The law referred to by the Washington Post is the Law on the Responsibility of Radio and Television passed by the National Assembly in November. It does not allow for the silencing of dissent, but merely introduces the same type of regulation of content that exists in most countries in the world. The law regulates when sexual and violent content can be shown, prevents slander against public officials and private citizens and seeks to guarantee space in the media market for independent media. The law does provide for fines and the suspension of broadcasting for 48 hours for repeated violations, but the law is not administered by the government, but by an independent body.

To understand why the Venezuelan government has felt it necessary to introduce this law, it is important to understand the role of the private media in Venezuela since Chavez came to power six years ago. The overwhelming majority of private TV, radio and print media have not only made no pretense at impartiality — they have led the campaign to overthrow the legitimately elected Chavez government.

In a comment piece posted at Venezuela Analysis on September 25, Eva Golinger argues that the two traditional parties that had governed Venezuela for four decades were so discredited because of their support for neoliberal policies that the private media stepped in to fill the role of political opposition to the pro-poor policies of Chavez.

The five main private TV channels and nine out of 10 national newspapers campaign against Chavez. Golinger reported that the five major TV stations control at least 90% of the market. Demonstrations by opposition supporters have received blanket coverage, while much larger pro-government demonstrations have been ignored.

A media coup The private media played a crucial role in the military coup of April 11, 2002, that overthrew Chavez and installed the head of the Chamber of Commerce in power — before a popular uprising of the poor restored Chavez as president. The private media gave blanket coverage to calls for opposition demonstrations on the day of the coup.

When government supporters on the streets returned fire against unknown snipers, the private media distorted footage to make it appear as though they were firing on unarmed opposition supporters. This footage became the key justification for the coup. After Chavez was overthrown, coup leaders appeared on TV thanking the media for their assistance. When the uprising by the poor began, the private TV channels refused to broadcast it, showing soap operas and cartoons instead.

Somewhat like what happened in the US when a US District judge ruled warrantless wire taps broke constitutional law, but the media decided to focus on a 10 year old murder case when some lunatic claimed he did it.


posted on Sep, 25 2006 @ 09:06 AM

Originally posted by Rex_Mundi
let us all get our facts straight first...

Excellent post. Hugo chavez was elected president of venezuela because he received the popular support of a majority of the voters in his country. He has received and continues to receive this support because the standard of living has improved for most voters since he came to office. Chavez has an obligation to these voters and he is apparently meeting this obligation to the satisfaction of these voters. He has no obligation to and does not look out for the interests of multinational corporations and the US, despite efforts to intimidate him into doing so.

<< 1  2  3   >>

log in