It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
An international research team led by Prof. Michael Kramer of the University of Manchester's Jodrell Bank Observatory, UK, has used three years of observations of the "double pulsar", a unique pair of natural stellar clocks which they discovered in 2003, to prove that Einstein's theory of general relativity - the theory of gravity that displaced Newton's - is correct to within a staggering 0.05%. Their results are published on the14th September in the journal Science and are based on measurements of an effect called the Shapiro Delay.
My discovery that neutrinos (my neutrinos, neutrino photons, not the prior art neutrinos) "carry" gravity makes most of the complicated features of General Relativity unnecessary if not wrong. Certainly, masses do not curve space. Space is merely the emptiness between things--it is nothing, you can't curve it. Space is also infinite in all three dimensions and there are only three dimensions: up and down, left and right and forward and backwards. Time is not a forth dimension; time is a measurable period between events. Time is absolute and is not affected in the least bit by how fast one is moving.
I do not understand string theory; however, I do understand that many very smart people believe in it because it produces results that are consistent with experimental results. The End of the Universe
 Neils Bohr long ago recognized that electron orbits of the hydrogen atom are stable only if the angular momentum of the electron, mvr, was an integral multiple of h/2 .pi. or mvr=nh/2 .pi.. He said if the electron were in any other orbit the orbiting electron would radiate energy quickly and spiral into the nucleus. Under the Ross Model of the hydrogen atom ground state electrons (electrons with no captured entrons, have kinetic energy 1/2 mv2 of 13.5 eV (corresponding to its naked speed of 2.18.times.10.sup.6 m/s) and cannot lose energy by radiation since they are naked and have no entrons to radiate.
The Coulomb forces of the two tronnies in each neutrino photon produce a reverse force on the charges in the stars and planets and everything else in the galaxy they pass through. This reverse force is directed back toward the source of the neutrino photons keeping these objects in their orbits in the galaxy. A small portion of the galaxy is sacrificed, actually pushed into the black hole, providing additional protons to be consumed to provide more neutrino photons to supply the galaxy its gravity. A portion of the neutrino photons from the black hole are temporally stopped in galactic objects (especially big ones) and later released in random directions giving the objects such as our sun, the planets including our earth and its moon their gravity. For all objects releasing neutrino photons the neutrino photon flux decreases as the inverse square of the distance from the object. This explains the object's gravity decreasing as the inverse square as explained by Isaac Newton.
Gravity results from the Coulomb force fields emanating from neutrinos as the neutrinos pass at the speed of light through matter. These Coulomb force fields travel rearward and sideways along the trail of the neutrinos. The sideways components cancel, but the rearward components add pushing the matter through which they are passing back toward the source of the neutrinos. Thus, neutrinos from the sun passing through the earth provide the "gravity" holding the earth in its orbit around the sun.
 "OK", a reader might ask, "Where does the earth get its gravity attracting me to its surface?" The answer is that a significant portion of neutrinos from the sun are scattered from protons and maybe electrons in the earth and some are absorbed then later released in all directions. So (except for the neutrinos passing through the earth from the sun and other neutrino sources) the total of the matter penetrating photons coming out from the earth is relatively uniform in all directions. These matter-penetrating photons apply a reverse force to the charged elements inside our bodies thus pushing us toward the center of the earth.
In a mass like the earth an equilibrium will be reached in which the number of neutrinos absorbed in all of the protons and electrons in the earth reaches a constant level which means that the earth is also a major source of neutrinos that are emitted in all directions. This source is (according to this feature of the Ross Model) the carrier of the earth's gravity.
Originally posted by behindthescenes
For one, I'm somewhat skeptical. But this man claims to have discovered a way to explain everything in the universe, correcting all the problems with the Theory of Relativity.
And he's applied for a U.S. patent.
Anyone want to venture comment on his theory?
Ross Model of the Universe
Originally posted by Anonymous ATS
reply to post by etshrtslr
The main reason for applying for the patent is that patent applications are published world wide. It is very difficult to get a scientific journal to publish a theory of everything that proposes that Einstein and many other great scientists were basically incorrect.
Originally posted by Tuning Spork
The smallest form of an element that can be recognised as that element is actually a molecule, not a single atom. For instance, pure oxygen is O2. Ozone is O3. There is no O1 because electrons exist as a wave, with crests and valleys, not a point particle travelling in a circle. Electrons' waves are better described as a figure-8, and require two nuclei in order to be captured as part of a molecule.
1) Combine general relativity and quantum gravity into a single theory that can claim to be the complete theory of nature.
2) Resolve the problems in the foundations of quantum mechanics, either by making sense of the theory as it stands or by inventing a new theory that does make sense.
3) Determine whether or not the various particles and forces can be unified in a theory that explains them all as manifestations of a single, fundamental theory.
4) Explain how the values of the free constants in the standard model of particle physics are chosen in nature.
5) Explain dark matter and dark energy. Or, if they don't exist, determine how and why gravity is modified on large scales. More generally, explain why the constants of the standard model of cosmology, including the dark energy, have the values they do.