It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

could martial law in thailand be a psy op for the american people?

page: 3
0
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 20 2006 @ 09:14 PM
link   
i notice you have to have the last word in everything....kinda reminds me of my ex girlfriend...lol

and no..your not trying to end it....your entertaining it further....


anywayz enough of this lame a$$

i hope everyone just ignores him @ this point.....

anywayz back to the thread....




posted on Sep, 20 2006 @ 09:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by Cylent_Noize
i notice you have to have the last word in everything....kinda reminds me of my ex girlfriend...lol

and no..your not trying to end it....your entertaining it further....


anywayz enough of this lame a$$

i hope everyone just ignores him @ this point.....

anywayz back to the thread....


I need to have the last word because I'm the only one trying to end it. If I wasn't trying to end it, you would be seeing the same "arrogant" and "ignorant" remarks that have been pointed out in past posts. So if you will just ignore me, that would be great.



posted on Sep, 20 2006 @ 09:18 PM
link   
I don't think it has anything to do with psyop either lol
i couldn't really see how anyway. Things just happen in countries sometimes, nwo people aren't gods that control everything.



posted on Sep, 20 2006 @ 09:22 PM
link   
Now anyways, back on this topic, I don't see how it's psyops. I think if it was set up, it would happen in a bigger government than Thailand. If it happened in a bigger government, it would kind of make our citizens believe that if it can happen to a government like that, then it's possible for ours to impose martial law. It's hardly a sign of controvery or conspiracy if a government gets overthrown for the first time in only 15 years. Clearly this is a common occurance for them.



posted on Sep, 20 2006 @ 09:22 PM
link   
strategically, theres no use in it either.

PLUS, no bullets were fired and no dead bodies in the streets.. this couldnt of been a US assisted event!


Good luck to them.
Being such a small country, they have the ability to overthrow a leader who doesnt have his citizens interests in heart.

I just wish the USA had the ability to do the same, but sadly.. the land is to vast, to industrialised and to corporate influenced.



posted on Sep, 20 2006 @ 09:25 PM
link   
Indeed, not everything has to be interconected. NWO or globalized economies, they would gain nothing by having the King of Tailand in charge.. like someone said earlier, that would actually go against what they want.. a corruptable government is a good government for the Corporate powers of the world, a traditionalist King with an Army outsting the corrupt governments would not be looked upon kindly.

Also the same thing is happening in Hungary, they have rioted in the capital of Budahpest because of their corrupt lieing government.



posted on Sep, 20 2006 @ 09:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agit8dChop
strategically, theres no use in it either.

PLUS, no bullets were fired and no dead bodies in the streets.. this couldnt of been a US assisted event!


Good luck to them.
Being such a small country, they have the ability to overthrow a leader who doesnt have his citizens interests in heart.

I just wish the USA had the ability to do the same, but sadly.. the land is to vast, to industrialised and to corporate influenced.


I would hope that if things get bad enough with this administration (as if things aren't already bad enough) that our military would stand up for us and take over. I mean come on, our military could easily overthrow our government. What are they gonna do about it? Is Bush gonna get up on the White House with a high powered sniper rifle? I doubt that, although it'd be funny. But, there's clearly a dis-agreement of government policies coming from the military. Maybe a coup in this country would save us. Complete re-form of our government system, putting BACK to use the constitution, and TRULY making it a government of the people, by the people, and for the people..not of greedy mass murderers, by scam artists, and for their own personal interests.



posted on Sep, 20 2006 @ 09:36 PM
link   
I wish that could happen Dickbinbush but it appears (to me atleast) that police, military, they think very little of actual citizens. Especially police, have you seen the video on ATS with the girl that was murdered by police in Boston? So sad, no police would support a more controlled government. Not all of course.. but a good number, or would be more easily influenced to protect the government, after all that is their job right?

The military are usually very conservative, very patriotic, if a soldier is told a bunch of rebels are threatening to overthrow the government they would not likely take side with the rebels.



posted on Sep, 20 2006 @ 09:43 PM
link   
That's what I was thinking. The government somehow has the military and police intimidated. And really, they would be our only hope for a situation such as overthrowing the government. I don't think we as citizens could do it, even if we got enough people to agree to try. So, unfortunately, I don't believe this will happen for us. Looks like the constitution, the very foundation in which this country was built on by our founding fathers, is deteriorating very quickly. Sadly, this is most likely what this administration wants. There is no way they could be that stupid to not realize they are completely destroying everything the United States was built for.


[Mod Edit: Removed quote of entire preceeding post. Please read this post and bear in mind there's usually no need to quote the post directly before yours when replying. Thanks - Jak]

[edit on 21/9/06 by JAK]



posted on Sep, 20 2006 @ 11:07 PM
link   
As an active duty service member in the US Navy I'll tell you why a coup will not happen in atleast the next 5 years.

Because the Bush administration has almost every one of our leaders, including the Joint Chiefs of Staff hooked around his finger.

Our chain of command (concerning the Navy atleast) is so ATE UP on Anti-terrorism and the safety of America, etc etc etc that they bow down to Bush as if he were a f!ng prophet leading us into salvation.

Truely its pathetic. Add to the fact that the average enlisted servicemember in the Army/Marines have LESS then a high school diploma (incase you guys didn't know that, GED and diploma requirements were waived a bit after 9/11) and you wonder why most service members really don't even take an active *interest* in world affairs, much less affairs of our own Government! It's REALLY SAD.

Take it from someone who is around it everyday.



posted on Sep, 21 2006 @ 12:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by zeeon
Our chain of command (concerning the Navy atleast) is so ATE UP on Anti-terrorism and the safety of America, etc etc etc.


Maybe thats because they know their Job to as the DEFENSE force to look after the safety of America.

Something I like about the US and Aussie Armed Forces is they (for the most part) keep their noses out of Politics and focus on their job - protecting the citizens.

[edit on 21-9-2006 by Ezekiel]



posted on Sep, 21 2006 @ 07:27 AM
link   
This thread reminds me of an old adage, 2+2=5 : the info is all simple, but people still manage to get the wrong answer.

I think there is more chance of me getting a foot rub this afternoon by the king of the Reptillians (Godzilla) than this coming true.....

However, if I am wrong - I am glad I am in a different country ;-)



posted on Sep, 21 2006 @ 11:02 AM
link   
I don't know what the Jordanian al Zarqawi's original name for his band of insurgents was, but he had a brilliant publicist, who suggested the new name, “al Qaeda in Iraq.” For a fact, there were no OBL al Qaeda in Iraq on March 18, 2003. Between all the lying by Bush43 and the long time lapse, it is really impossible for me to know if there are or are not any OBL al Qaeda in Iraq in 2006. It is stated authoritatively that Zarqawi wanted to join OBL’s group, but that Zarqawi had so many ides not shared with OBL that his request to join was denied.

That Zarqawi returned to Iraq with a small band of desperate fellows is also a known fact, and that he changed the name of his band 6-8 months ago, is likewise. This new name suited perfectly the Bush43 strategy at home, to keep Americans scared to death of al Qaeda, so they quickly opted to use it without explanation, because every time anyone says the groups name, “al Qaeda in Iraq” it works to the Bush43 advantage.

In fact, some people have suggested it was none other than Karl Rove who made the suggestion via his Jordanian contacts.

This is the same effort by another with the obvious name, “DickBinBush.” Not smart, just crude and vulgar.



[edit on 9/21/2006 by donwhite]



posted on Sep, 21 2006 @ 11:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by donwhite
This is the same effort by another with the obvious name, “DickBinBush.” Not smart, just crude and vulgar.


Crude and vulgar? How is it crude and vulgar? It's pretty simple Dick Cheney, Osama Bin Laden, and George Bush. It's me implying they are all one, meaning, all evil in a sense, I guess you could say? I don't know why I'm having to explain my name anyway. If you took it in a offensive form, then that's your problem. Mods have not contacted me about my name being "crude" or "vulgar", so until that day, It stays as is.



posted on Sep, 21 2006 @ 12:02 PM
link   
Would you call your selections serendipity or coincidence? I can live with anything you can print, but I like to keep the ladies on the board comfortable. So I’m finished with personal critique.






[edit on 9/21/2006 by donwhite]



posted on Sep, 21 2006 @ 12:38 PM
link   

Originally posted by donwhite
Would you call your selections serendipity or coincidence? I can live with anything you can print, but I like to keep the ladies on the board comfortable. So I’m finished with personal critique.


It's coincidence whether you believe it or not. I have no need or desire to express sexual terms on a political message board. You are the only one to complain about my name so clearly the ladies are already comfortable. Don't accuse me of having some out of control sexually charged state of mind while creating my name when you were the first one to look at it and have that image pop into your head.



posted on Sep, 21 2006 @ 01:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by donwhite
Would you call your selections serendipity or coincidence? I can live with anything you can print, but I like to keep the ladies on the board comfortable. So I’m finished with personal critique.

I dunno, I'm a lady (well woman anyways), and I understood his name for what he says it is, not anything vulgar. But, meh...you guys can fight about it if you want.

Anyways, I'm new, and I have been perusing the site for some time, before actually getting the cahones (or female equivalent) to post.

I'm unsure of whether the martial law would be a pre-emptive action for the citizens of the US. I do know that Halliburton is building concentration camps for a supposed "influx of immigrants".

"In another shining example of modern day corporate fascism, it was announced recently that Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root had been awarded a $385 million dollar contract by Homeland Security to construct detention and processing facilities in the event of a national emergency"www.prisonplanet.com... entioncamps.htm

PS. I know its old news, but I thought I could get the ball rolling here again...



posted on Sep, 21 2006 @ 01:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by hedder
Anyways, I'm new, and I have been perusing the site for some time, before actually getting the cahones (or female equivalent) to post.


Uh oh, that might be considered vulgar..you better watch it!



Nah, but anyway, back on topic..about those concentration camps..I never heard about that. I'm going to look at the link you provided. Thanks for posting it!



posted on Sep, 21 2006 @ 01:20 PM
link   
Wow..

It's amazing the similarities between this administration and the Nazi's..

The Nazi's had concentration camps for Jews..

We have concentration camps for Muslims..and soon..ANYBODY

So, at the request of the president, ANYONE can be jailed without trial..

Basically, all of our rights, especially right to free speech, is being taken away..just ripped from us. The constitution clearly means nothing to these people..

And that SHOULD be enough to sway people to the right side of things and commit to a coup of our own government, but unfortunately, there is a very large amount of people in this country that simply don't care. They don't follow politics enough to know what is actually going on..

A little off topic here, but this makes me believe MORE that not only 9/11 was done by this government..but if a nuclear attack occurs, I believe it will be the U.S. government's doing. That will lead to martial law. These concentration camps are being built RIGHT NOW in case a "national emergency". There are war games and drills being done all over the country for simulted nuclear attacks. It's quite disturbing the trends that are becoming so obvious that point to something in the works. Something is about to happen..



posted on Sep, 21 2006 @ 03:35 PM
link   


posted by DickBinBush

“ . . the similarities between this administration and the Nazi's . . had concentration camps for Jews . . We have concentration camps for Muslims . . at the request of the president ANYONE can be jailed without trial . . our rights, especially free speech . . being taken away. . ripped from us. The constitution means nothing to these people. That SHOULD sway people to the right side of things but unfortunately, there is a very large amount of people that simply don't care. They don't follow politics enough to know what is going on . . A little off topic but this makes me believe MORE that not only 9/11 was done by this government . . but if a nuclear attack occurs, I believe it will be the U.S. government's doing. That will lead to martial law. These concentration camps are being built RIGHT NOW in case a "national emergency." There are war games and drills being done all over the country for simulated nuclear attacks. It's quite disturbing the trends that are becoming obvious that point to something in the works. Something is about to happen . . “ [Edited by Don W]



I expect the BKR sites are more likely for “undocumented” workers if we decide to begin deporting them. Unlike the WW2 treatment of 200,000 Japanese there are 3 million Muslims, mostly of Middle Eastern origin, which is too many to put in custody.

Our military worries me. Our soldiers are mostly trained in “urban” warfare. This fits perfectly into a Bush43 “take over” scenario. Soldiers have always been propagandized - hey, to make a guy charge a machine gun takes mucho convincing - and with the improvement of psy-ops, the soldiers may believe anything if told by their higher-ups. And, soldiers are under heavy penalty for disobeying an order from a superior officer. So, who is a soldier loyal to? The nebulous concept of country or the man who signs his paycheck and holds his fiscal future in his hands?

Did our guys do the Nine Eleven Event? Not likely. Too well done for us.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join