Avro Project Y, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 17-9-2006 @ 09:21 AM by PhloydPhan
The "Popular Mechanics Cover Story" the man talks about in the video is a story about a North American Aviation concept called the Lenticular Reentry Vehicle which was, essentially a concept for a nuclear-powered flying saucer. Information on the LRV was declassified in 1999. The article describes it thusly:
The operational mission design is six weeks' duration at a nominal orbital altitude of 300 nautical miles, with a crew of four men," according to the report. The weapons bay would hold "four winged weapons" that could be either launched or detached and parked on orbit. There are repeated references to the LRV launching weapons-carrying clusters.

It also mentions that the LRV would have required either a large, multi-stage booster rocket to achieve orbit or might eventually have made use of one of the then-in-development nuclear rockets - such as NERVA - which were tested but never flew.
Since nuclear rockets were never (for any number of reasons) developed to the point of building a production design, and since the number of Saturn boosters constructed for the Apollo program (10 Saturn I, 12 Saturn IB (+ 2 unused first sages), 15 Saturn V) is well known from, the LRV would not have had a launch vehicle, had it ever been built, which it wasn't. For this man to claim that a British version flew is just BS, not because the Brits couldn't have built it (they certainly could have) but because they've never had a launch vehicle of placing this or any other manned vehicle into space. If Britain had manned spaceflight capability they would have told the world - although they probably wouldn't have used a black project like this to advertise their capability.


reply posted on 17-9-2006 @ 06:04 PM by PhloydPhan
Avro Canada. D'oh! Every time I hear the name "Avro" I immediately think of the Vulcan bomber. My bad.

But it doesn't make any practical difference. This project wasn't taken on by Avro Canada any more than it was by Britain - they had no indigenous launch vehicle, for one. Arguing that this was a Canadian project drives another nail into the coffin of this supposed "black project" - Canada has never possessed nuclear weapons, although they worked closely with Britain and the US when both countries were building their first nuclear weapons. Canada has also allowed US nuclear-capable ships and planes to use Canadian ports and airbases, and (under a complicated arrangement that left a miles-long paper trail) US-made nuclear armed missiles were based in Canada from the mid 60's until 1984 (under an arrangement with the US where both countries had to okay the firing of the aforementioned missiles). US
Genie nuclear-tipped air-to-air missiles were also available to Canadian forces in the event of a Soviet first strike against NATO, and these were administered by US military detachments at relevant Canadian airbases. These US troops would "release" the weapons to the RCAF if needed. But Canada NEVER had an indigenous nuclear arsenal, and weapons "on loan" to arm an Avro Project Y-derived Lenticular Reentry Vehicle would have left a mass of paper and red tape in their wake. Someone would have noticed.

As far as the Avro Car goes, even Avro enthusiast sites like this one admit that it was, apart from some VTOL data that was later applied to the nascent Harrier jump-jet development project, a failure.


reply posted on 18-9-2006 @ 05:36 AM by D4rk Kn1ght
www.laesieworks.com...


here you go -some nice pictures of it during engineering mock up stage.

Looks just like some of the UFO's that were sighted in the early 60's....


reply posted on 18-4-2007 @ 01:51 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by warset
UFO projects are not going to work in at least another 50years, so any UFO related projects are not very interesting
or at least to me


So then what made you come in here then? D'OH!

For the others who ARE interested...

www.avrocar.com...

The Avro project was quite definately a Coanda effect "saucer" design.

The Coanda effect is quite valid and works on all fluids, air, water AND plasma, which is the key to actual practical saucer applications. Both the AFRL and LANL have been working on plasma technology for decades, as have contractors like Lockheed...

What makes you think they haven't got anywhere? LOL

As to the Coanda effect craft being a :dead issue", why is the US Navy publishing documents about it in 2000? Hmmm?

The Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) has successfully simulated the Coanda Effect....PDF

PDF File www.fluent.com...

And to those that believe the technology that powered the Avro idea doesn't work... have a look at these two test videos from JLN Labs.

Windows Media films...

Coanda Effect UAV - JLN Labs Demo Video Test Flight #1

file:///E|/00LandofLegends.us/41pegasus/10videos/gfsafpdflt1.wmv

Coanda Effect UAV - JLN Labs Demo Video Test Flight #2

file:///E|/00LandofLegends.us/41pegasus/10videos/gfsafpdflt2.wmv

There is also a British company working on the same thing GFS Products

www.gfsprojects.co.uk...

They make great surveillance craft...

And as to that plasma tech I was talking about?

LOOK MA! NO AILERONS!!

Seems the Coanda effect and plasma flow is very efficient indeed...

Revolutionary Hypersonic Aerospace Vehicles
With Plasma Actuators That Require No Moving Parts

Air Force Research Laboratory

landoflegends.us...






[edit on 18-4-2007 by zorgon]


reply posted on 9-1-2009 @ 11:39 PM by phrankie79
I came upon this thread, after looking through some vague, sanatized FOIA documents. I came upon

Here's the url

Scroll down to the " REPORTED SIGHTING OF UNCONVENTIONAL AIRCRAFT" listing.

Where a "ufo" reported may in fact be related to the project "y" craft. I'm not an expert on this topic, but from what i've read, project "y" was a saucer shapped craft that was nuclear powered?



[edit on 9-1-2009 by phrankie79]

[edit on 9-1-2009 by phrankie79]


reply posted on 10-1-2009 @ 04:18 AM by waynos
reply to post by phrankie79



You might be interested to see this thread I started on the subject about a year ago

www.abovetopsecret.com...
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



In Case Of Videos Of Flying People
  Posted 10 days ago with 9 member flags
First flight for \'flapless\' plane - the Evolution of Aviation
  Posted 13 days ago with 4 member flags
Boeing X-37 and X-40 - the ultimate history
  Posted 6 days ago with 3 member flags
F22 mishap or more that meeets the eye?
  Posted 2 days ago with 3 member flags
Its a bird, its a plane, no its a ....
  Posted 15 days ago with 0 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 14 hours ago, 109 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 10 hours ago, 93 replies
Hollow Earth Theory New Evidence.
  General Conspiracies, Posted 9 hours ago, 61 replies
Free will
  Philosophy and Metaphysics, Posted 12 hours ago, 50 replies