5,000 high resolution moon mission pictures, page 10

privacy

Pages: << 7 8 9 10 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 11 times

reply posted on 14-2-2008 @ 12:51 PM by IMAdamnALIEN

Originally posted by sputniksteve
reply to post by goatboy

Hi goatboy welcome to the site. You might want to read over the rules here, we are not suppose to be posting in all Caps. It is unnecessary. Enjoy yourself!

I can understand his frustration!

THE PICTURES ARE GONE!!!!

See it displays emotion.

Doo doo do the picutres are gone hmm dittyly hmm

See does that get the point across? No.

reply posted on 14-2-2008 @ 01:02 PM by zorgon

Well yes I would surely agree that there are times when those caps DO help...

But then you can always do this...

THE PICTURES ARE GONE!!!!

reply posted on 14-2-2008 @ 01:07 PM by internos

reply to post by zorgon

Here you can find better res pics:

AS07-5-1613

AS07-6-1700

the pictures are both intriguing: the color of the first fireball could have been determined by the filters (green dots can be seen elwhere in the same photo.

reply posted on 14-2-2008 @ 03:54 PM by racquemis

many of the pictures in questions can still be found on the nasa history pages
like this one
history.nasa.gov...

they can be found on these pages
history.nasa.gov...
history.nasa.gov...
history.nasa.gov...
history.nasa.gov...
history.nasa.gov...
etc.

EDIT: already posted a page back, i apologize

want to find the pictures questioned in this topic, open the correct link and search for the filename without the HR and .jpg

[edit on 14-2-2008 by racquemis]

reply posted on 14-2-2008 @ 04:03 PM by zorgon

reply to post by internos

Are those better res? or merely enlargements...

I say we all chip in and buy NASA a few of these... (I think they run about 5 bucks a piece)

Then MAYBE we can get some better pics for our money

reply posted on 14-2-2008 @ 04:46 PM by sherpa

reply to post by zorgon

Funny that they would post that and then still remove the images related to it. I guess they don't want us to see the "Mylar"

Thats nothing I have discovered the hanger door on the farside.

reply posted on 14-2-2008 @ 05:16 PM by internos

reply to post by zorgon

Ron, if i'm correct one should be a better res scan, the other one is an enlargement form a tiff.

reply to post by sherpa

OMG, what the heck happened to that pic

eol.jsc.nasa.gov...

[edit on 14/2/2008 by internos]

reply posted on 14-2-2008 @ 06:01 PM by zorgon

Originally posted by sherpa
Thats nothing I have discovered the hanger door on the farside.

I don't know... maybe thats another piece of Mylar" But look at the SIZE of it

and why is there a shadow on the Moon from that 'object'?

Originally posted by internos
OMG, what the heck happened to that pic

You caught them red handed...

Now look at the 'whole big picture" It is a piece of tape holding a photograph at the top... and your 'hires copy" is a photograph of the photo taped to the wall

Well I guess I won't be wasting any more money buying high resolution images from NASA or LPI

That ought to get Sherpa an award

[edit on 14-2-2008 by zorgon]

reply posted on 15-2-2008 @ 11:02 AM by nablator

Originally posted by zorgon

What I have noticed with the Teague directory is that there is a correlation to the pictures in the directory and the anomalies we are finding...

The mylar pic was recently added to the Apollo 10 archive page by Kipp Teague. That's why it's not in the Google cache. It first appeared in his work directory.

Kipp scans pics, puts them in his work directory:
"the evil NAZA is hiding some pictures, they are only found in a hidden directory!"

Kipp transfers them to the Apollo archive:
"the evil NAZA removed the pictures as soon as we found them!"

Pure paranoia.

[edit on 2008-2-15 by nablator]

reply posted on 15-2-2008 @ 08:46 PM by sherpa

reply to post by zorgon

That ought to get Sherpa an award

Cheques, money orders currency of any denomination are gatefully accepted and can be sent to the address below.

PO Box 17
Letsbe Avenue
Kwikasucan

[edit on 15-2-2008 by sherpa]

reply posted on 16-2-2008 @ 09:22 PM by zorgon

Originally posted by nablator
The mylar pic was recently added to the Apollo 10 archive

Why? Why recently... and why are the pictures not available in the archive?

reply posted on 16-2-2008 @ 09:27 PM by blowfishdl

this is suppossed to be the moon? whats with the ocean???

161.115.184.211...

reply posted on 16-2-2008 @ 09:30 PM by bigfatfurrytexan

reply to post by zorgon

And moreover, why is NASA wasting time/resources on the crap that is presented above when they have so much other, more pertinent scans to release.

reply posted on 17-2-2008 @ 01:20 AM by internos

reply to post by blowfishdl

No, that's the Earth:

Identification
Mission: AS07 Roll: 6 Frame: 1699 Mission ID on the Film or image: AS7
Country or Geographic Name: IRAN
Features: PERSIAN GULF,WINDOW OBST
Center Point Latitude: 30.0 Center Point Longitude: 49.0 (Negative numbers indicate south for latitude and west for longitude)
Stereo: No (Yes indicates there is an adjacent picture of the same area)
ONC Map ID: JNC Map ID:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Camera
Camera Tilt: High Oblique
Camera Focal Length: 80mm
Camera: HB: Hasselblad
Film: SO121 : Kodak Ektachrome 64.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quality
Film Exposure: Normal
Percentage of Cloud Cover: 5 (0-10)

Source:
Image Science and Analysis Laboratory, NASA-Johnson Space Center.

Image source

reply posted on 9-2-2009 @ 10:11 AM by Anonymous ATS

reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 01:29 AM by Anonymous ATS

reply posted on 18-2-2009 @ 06:57 AM by InfaRedMan

What a bugger that the photo's are gone. Did anyone manage to download the whole set? There should have been a coordinated effort to grab all the images with each person getting a designated range.

We used to do that with old O-dayz Warez sites because they were notorious for going down as quick as they sprang up. We'd all hit designated files of multi-filed RAR's... then send the missing files to one another afterward to remake the full program.

Anyone thought of doing something like that in the future?

IRM

reply posted on 30-9-2009 @ 06:38 PM by amongus

Bump. . .because this thread was amazing.

Zorgon, still the man!

reply posted on 30-9-2009 @ 06:53 PM by Skeptical Ed

reply to post by Acharya

Was this frame discussed?: 161.115.184.211...

It was discussed a couple of years ago on Unexplained Mysteries with my finding additional frames and Jim Oberg giving his assessment.

Pages: << 7 8 9 10 >> ^^TOP^^