It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New world system..newbie

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 15 2006 @ 08:02 PM
link   
Hi Guys,
New member first post.
I been thinking lately about these huge multinational companies..and that obviously..the success of these major companies will have an effect on the bank balances and pensions of everyday people (the money has to come from somewhere right!)..so if governments have a plan to unite, and if there is a force that wants to bring in a one word regeime..how will these huge companies exist beyond the government??..and could this nwo regeime be likened to a sort of communism? and will the governments going to dictate to us what we can buy and sell??..then where do these multi national companies fit into this?

How could capitalizm exist under a one world government?...maybe the one world government would be the ultimate goal of capitalizm..control of all commerse and transactions..and who is going to decide who will be rich and who will be poor in this new system?? or is it simply the ones in power are fine but the rest of us are screwed.

[edit on 15-9-2006 by cfader]




posted on Sep, 15 2006 @ 08:14 PM
link   
Well, I'm no expert on the matter, but from the small amount of research I've done into this, a lot of the same people are both in politics and run those companies. George Bush Sr, for example, works for the Carlyle (sp?) Group, a multibillion dollar investment firm. Dick Cheney worked for Halliburton, and while he supposedly severed all ties with them when he became vice president of the US, a lot of people have questioned what appears to be preferential treatment by the government of that company.

These big companies are also essentially paying no tax, as compared to their earnings, because of legal loopholes and current tax laws, at least percentage-wise, compared to the average person. Companies are able to lobby far too easily to get their own way in government, because they have fame and money on their side, not to mention huge influences on thousands of jobs.

For the effect on things like pensions, look at a company like Enron, which recently went bankrupt after its owners essentially robbed the shareholders and employees of their stock value and pensions. A lot of people got royally screwed by that, and about a half dozen made millions off of it.

Personally, I don't think there is a single, unified force trying to bring about a one world regime, though many others here do believe it. I think good arguments can be made either way. I could maybe see such a one world goverment being, not like true communism, but like Russian communism, where the average people got shafted and the leaders lived in luxury.

Yeah, that's my two cents. Take a look at some posts by people like Infinite, he has done a lot of research in this area. Unfortunately, I don't think he's active on this board anymore, or at least I haven't seen any evidence of it, but his past posts should be helpful.



posted on Sep, 16 2006 @ 12:30 AM
link   
The NWO’s plan is flexible. They can adapt to any system. In the last 200 years corporations have become their main mean of control. In Capitalist and Fascist systems they do extremely well. (A Capitalist/Socialist blend like today where the corporations receive corporate welfare, and the middle class supports the lower classes is also an ideal environment for our corporate elites.)

However in an uncorrupted communist system, where people no longer care for personal property (communal), the elite class would quickly dissipate, since their property makes them who they are. (Unless their blood truly is blue
)

Therefore they tend to annihilate Communists. (see South America)

Check out:
tinwiki.org...


[edit on 16/9/06 by ConspiracyNut23]



new topics
 
0

log in

join