Originally posted by Souljah
Only Bible readers who wear the thickest rose-colored glasses can fail to notice all the blood and violence that fill its pages.
Let me be the first to state as a Christian that, from what I've been taught and believe, all of those mentioned events took place in the Old
Testament, BEFORE Jesus Christ came to save us from ourselves.
Bearing in mind that that's what I personally believe, I don't go around telling everyone that they
MUST believe as I do, since that's not
my job. My job is to live as an example of how my God wanted everyone to behave.
Since Jesus died, we've became emissaries to the people, trying to show them a more peaceful way. Well, that's the way it was SUPPOSED to be.
However, some people came along and ruined all of that by stepping in between the people and God, and started interpreting what God was saying to the
people. Anyone with a brain in their heads knows that when someone "intercedes" with you and some entity that you cannot see, that you cannot trust
them to tell you what they are supposed to be telling you.
While I don't like things some groups do, I don't judge or condemn them for their actions, since that's not my job. I live by a code of morals that
extends far above what most would consider tolerable. Part of my belief is to not judge someone for any reason, since their creator will judge them
according to their actions when the time is right. If they believe that Mohammad did all of the things they say, and they try to live that the best
they can, that's just fine. It only becomes a problem when they start indiscriminately killing innocent people just because they believe in someone
else as a savior. When that happens, then the massacres start. Now that's not to say that Christians haven't had their time of massacring, because
they have, during the Crusades. No one's perfect, and this should serve as a perfect example of that.
So far as I know, my God has not told anyone to go out and massacre large groups of people for any reason, regardless of what anyone says. That's not
the way I understood my teachings. I believe that we must adopt a more peaceful attitude towards everyone, allowing them the room for growth that
everyone should have. The only time that I think that anyone should have a problem is when a group gets out of control, and goes around challenging
others just because they think they can. Then, and ONLY then, do I advocate the use of force to subdue them. However, as soon as they are subdued, the
attackers should cease and desist so that the people can rethink their outlook on life.
It's no one's duty to rule over everyone else. It's the moral responsibility of
everyone to try to do the best they can for all of those
around them. It's just a sad fact that most people don't think the same way.
TheBorg
[Edited for clarification and grammar.]
[edit on 17-9-2006 by TheBorg]