Originally posted by Odium
jlc163, where to begin?
Let’s pick out this bit first:
(I.e. Spainards are better than others and only Spain shall prevail, and btw, Spain is ONLY catholic.)
Spain now is not only Catholic, you must know this. So I assume you must mean during the Spanish Inquisition. Granada ring a bell? Boabdil of Granada
maybe? Islam was banished from Spain in 1492 but it still did exist there during the Inquisition, however the Inquisition itself only had power over
baptized Christians.
Sorry, but Spain has never been a solidly Catholic Nation.
Reference: Hugh Kennedy, Muslim Spain and Portugal: A Political History of al-Andalus,
Over-exaduation, and was not meant to be seen as if I
directly believed that. Should have put quotes, to read like this:
(I.e. "Spainards are better than others and only Spain shall prevail, and btw, Spain is ONLY catholic.")
There was an expulsion, wasn't worried about why, but you can't get rid of one faith altogehter no matter how hard you try.
It would be like me going on and on about being raised Catholic.
I wasn't directly raised Catholic, just raised around so many Catholics I could choke on them, quite literally.
My point was that much of the Spanish Inquisition was about keeping Spain in control, not just some in-church thing. (This is a bit easier to see by
how they had their issues with England, during this time period, some of it was jsut political.) Making it lean more towards a Nationalist issue than
most people, who want to force this into an ONLY religion issue, would like. The only point I was making.
I guess I'm going to have to find a wanking smiley to make it clear when I'm not so hard up on my point that I'm overstepping.
The ONLY reason it is failing is because it's crumbling into a Socialist state (socialsist, in basic terms=democracy+communism),
No it’s not. I suggest you read over some socialist books, Robert Owen is a good start.
Socialism and Communism, only has something to do with each other in the minds of Marxists. Communism existed hundreds of years before the word
Socialism ever did. About 1780 [Robert Owne] to then 1516 [Thomas More]. Socialism never has been Democracy + Communism.
Your opinion. You act like I haven't read any of it. It's called an opinion.
Besides, it's like trying to lay all these out on a color spectrum, not that they are made from each other, but that they do share some similar
triats, so it looks as if they were directly made from taking bits and pieces of each other. I am trying to limit how much I'm writing, here.

Socialism, with respect to certain beliefs, traditionally falls between our governemnt and a Communist goverment's basic set up.
Hell, no 2 Communist Governments are going to be exactly the same, even 2 people can't agree on all the tennants of such governements.
I still beleive that your point of view on it is wrong, and blatantly so.
Which is why I stated, AT MOST he was a pagan with a soft spot for Wagner.
Nope.
Hitler believed in Positive Christianity.
Reference: Richard Steigmann-Gall, The Holy Reich, Cambridge University Press, 2003
Good, you follow him.
I pointed out, that though he outright dismissed 2 other records as being copies, he only cast enough doubt on 1, supposedly the closes to the
source.
I didn't think he did a good enough job to fully dismiss it.
And you really haven't paid all that mcuh attention, have you, to my thoughts. There's a "christian" and then there's a chrisitian.
As he wasn't immersed, as an adult mind, for the remission of sins, confessing to seek only him, and continuing to seek diligently after him, after
counting the cost, so he is no Christian by the Book that started this whole mess.
As I said, at the least, he is no christian. I don't really care who the hell accepted him.
I have an extremely limited definition as to what a Chrisitan is, as I alluded to in some of my Bush comments...and it's not just me. There are
whole gropus that wouldn't accept his "acceptance in a church", not because of what he did to the Jews, but because of his way he was accepted into
the faith. What he did to the Jews is a completely seperate issue. It's the same reason why they expect to see Jeffrey Dahmer and not Hitler.
Want me to reference it to mutliple people with degrees for you?

I can. I can get them to directly talk to you via email, too.