posted on Jun, 9 2007 @ 01:03 PM
Originally posted by hoochymama
The last two 'almost terror' attacks in the US were thwarted before they happened. What I noticed in the reports were that they knew about them a
year in advanced or a couple months. I believe the New Jersey one they knew about 6months in advance and the recent JFK one was known since 96'.
Do you have any links to this informtion? Would be nice to have it on this thread.
I guess this point highlights how easy it would be for rogue elements of the intelligence agencies to become aware of terror plots and then to either
subvert investigations into them (as it seems might have happened with 9/11 if you recall the FBI whisltleblower Coleen Rowleys account of how her
investigations into one of the highjackers prior to 9/11 was halted www.time.com...
or to actually physically assist the terror plot by creating diversions or coverups (i.e terror 'drills).
These instances show that our intelligence agencies are extremely powerfull, and when (with both 9/11 and 7/11 our governments had connections to
those involved (the organiser in 7/7 was an MI6 asset www.theinsider.org...
and of course I don't need to
link the connections that America had with Bin Laden). In these circumstances could the information of these attacks have slipped by us without
assistance from within?
Essentially, in terms of the the 'drills' in question,even if you set aside the unlikelyhood of both 9/11 and 7/7 having government drills happening
at the same time, it is clear that these operations would have assisted both the terrorists and the rogue elements of the government who may have been
involved. The drills caused confusion for the authorities responsible for dealing with these types of attacks, creating a window of oppurtunity, and
would have created a perfect shroud to cover any government agent who had knowledge or was complicit.
This is VERY interesting to me since considering the multiple links mentioned in this thread we knew of ALL the recent terror attacks in
But doesn't it come as a suprise to anyone that the UK and US intelligence agencies had no concrete foreknowledge of what was going to happen. It is
well documented that intelligence agencies in Europe and the mossad on Isreal knew the attacks where imminent. Basically i am saying that I cannot
believe that attacks of these magnitude could have slipped by unnoticed without complicity from the elements within the intelligence agencies. This is
especially evident with 9/11 when you see how close the FBI where to some of the highjackers.
Another thing that keeps being brought up in Bush's speeches is that he ALWAYS mentions AL-QUEDA as the threat but EVERY terrorist event we thwart
doesn't even involve Al-QUEDA.
Al-Queda is a blanket term that our governments use to describe unrelated muslim extremist groups. 'Al-Queda' doesn't exist as such. Yes there may
be an element of networking with these groups, but with the strength of the intelligence agencies that are against them, I don't think it makes sense
for any extremist group who are aiming to terrorize to communicate over a global scale. Surely any terrorist cell would work on a small scale if they
truly wanted to succeed. This though is merely my opinion.
Anyway, it's my opinion that analysing the actions of the government and it's agencies surrounding the events is a far more realistic avenue to
exposing the complicity of our governments. All I can say is, to me personally, forgetting bombs in the buildings and global hawks etc...... Its
f***ing obvious guys.