John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS, page 84
Pages: <<  81    82    83    84    85    86    87  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 123 times


reply posted on 21-1-2007 @ 06:25 PM by FreiMaurer
Again what are the scales on these?



reply posted on 21-1-2007 @ 09:12 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by FreiMaurer
Again what are the scales on these?


All the info on scale and other image data is on the menu page on my website

landoflegends.us...

Skeptic Overlord posted this image in the other thread that was there on this topic... can't seem to find it now though...

Here is a quote that is relevant to the question of scale...


Posted by SkepticOverlord, on September 18, 2006 at 22:00 GMT

Granted, the violence and kinetic energy of a massive meteor impact can certainly melt rock and cause all manner of formations.

On the other hand, there are some compelling features that have unique parallels.


image on left en.wikipedia.org...

If this is a surface mining site, I think it's ancient.

Posted by SkepticOverlord, on September 19, 2006 at 14:28 GMT

To illustrate the point, I've added what should be a reasonable representation of a yellow steam shovel (they're not so little) to the photo at what should be scale.

Here: www.waid-observatory.com... The copernicus walls are 11,400 feet at their tallest point... if we assume worst case, I cropped the image to cover the cliff only, and scaled it to 456 pixels, or one pixel for every 25 feet. (The scale is likely off due to the perspective of the photo, but it's close enough for what we're doing here.)

Now if we assign a very generous height of 75 feet to our shovel, it will look something like this:






reply posted on 22-1-2007 @ 12:42 AM by undo
I call this one Smoke and UFOs

Here's the original piece


Here it is with colored highlighting to point out some of the anomalies


And here's the Source photo from Apollo 12 archives i do believe:
thestargates.com...



reply posted on 22-1-2007 @ 01:20 PM by johnlear
Originally posted by IeatALIENS
Mr. Lear, thank you for the photos.
I also want to say that I do believe the situation is very interesting and plausible.
That being said, I hope you appreciate what I have found in the
upper-right of the Copernicus 1 image:
This is the magnified version. Magnify as needed.
i138.photobucket.com...




Thanks for the post IeatALIENS. We enjoy input from anyone who may wish to contribute. Some contributions are better than others but all are appreciated. We hope that in the future you have a post thats even more valuable than the last. If that were possible. Thanks again.


reply posted on 22-1-2007 @ 10:51 PM by zorgon
Here is the ORIGINAL size of the photos taken by Lunar Orbiter....

This is the NASA photo crew working on Lunar Orbiter IV images...


Soooo WHERE ARE THESE BIG PICTURES NOW????




This one is interesting... the impact site of Ranger III taken by Lunar Orbiter II, a lesson in photo object identification...




LOL that's right boys and girls... this one is done by NASA Scientists...

[edit on 22-1-2007 by zorgon]
Pages: <<  81    82    83    84    85    86    87  >>    ^^TOP^^



"My God, its full of stars!"
  Posted 12 days ago with 83 member flags
Tower on the Moon filmed by amateur
  Posted 16 days ago with 71 member flags
Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 1 days ago with 49 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 9 days ago with 28 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 5 days ago with 21 member flags
Russia proposes international Moon base-- again!
  Posted 14 days ago with 20 member flags