It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS

page: 65
164
<< 62  63  64    66  67  68 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 2 2007 @ 12:07 AM
link   
Just to show an important example and comparison in image recognition...

Here is an old aerial photograph taken by the RAF over Peenemunde in Germany during the second world war... the big area is obvious and this is a much closer view point but what is important to this search is the two objects marked "Rocket" and "Trailer"...

Now the RAF used this recognition to plan bombing raids... the images we have are several levels above these in quality.





Now they used trained people and were looking for expected objects, in the same manner that we here search for expected objects to support the mine hypothesis.

I will be busy and away from my computer for the next few days... and will only have time to check in for a few minutes, so don't panic at my absence LOL




posted on Jan, 3 2007 @ 11:36 PM
link   
The photograph is beyond strange.

I do not know what the object is on the lizard’s back.

I’m guessing the lizard has been there between 12,000 and 50 Million Years.

My amateur explanation/examination of the dead lizard:

The Moon at one time had an atmosphere, and water.

The Lizard died instantly. (relatively)

The Lizard boiled internally frothed, bubbled, and burst from the inside.

The Lizard was exposed to relative vacuum and high temperature from some sort of cataclysmic event.




posted on Jan, 4 2007 @ 01:54 AM
link   
Where'd you get that image from? I'd like to see the uncut version, if you could possibly find it. Thanks in advance.

TheBorg



posted on Jan, 4 2007 @ 07:51 AM
link   
Here I have mapped the clementine moon gif on post id 2666648 to a sphere and rendered it in Bryce one shot close up and one shot animated. I would love to find a bump map, or displacement map of the shot. In such mapping, the lighter colors are raised and the darker colors are depressed, thus providing 3d details.






posted on Jan, 4 2007 @ 08:23 AM
link   

Originally posted by nephyx
Why is everyone so willing to look at a rock and assume its something else? How delusional are some of you?

Oh and noone has explained to me why these pictures are so amazing yet.


If you look in the upper right corner, see that blob over there ? Thats an alien mining iron. You can see the road next to him. And oh look below that pyramid, you'll see his starcruiser. See that grey smudge that looks like nothing, thats a city of alien buildings.

I dont see anything either in these pics. And I doubt the rumors of an alien presence on the moon. I doubt we would be building a base on the moon if we thought for a second there was an alien city there. Wouldnt the ground-based telescopes have spotted something by now ?



posted on Jan, 4 2007 @ 11:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by admriker444 I dont see anything either in these pics. And I doubt the rumors of an alien presence on the moon. I doubt we would be building a base on the moon if we thought for a second there was an alien city there. Wouldnt the ground-based telescopes have spotted something by now ?


You have looked at all of them and don't see anything unusual? In this respect you are truly different than any one of us!

And who said anything about aliens? You did, that's who! Just try and get someone to point a powerful enough telescope at the Moon, and then you will be in for it!

Nothing unusual indeed! I suppose your world looks just like it.



posted on Jan, 4 2007 @ 11:33 AM
link   

Originally posted by Matyas

Originally posted by admriker444 I dont see anything either in these pics. And I doubt the rumors of an alien presence on the moon. I doubt we would be building a base on the moon if we thought for a second there was an alien city there. Wouldnt the ground-based telescopes have spotted something by now ?


You have looked at all of them and don't see anything unusual? In this respect you are truly different than any one of us!

And who said anything about aliens? You did, that's who! Just try and get someone to point a powerful enough telescope at the Moon, and then you will be in for it!

Nothing unusual indeed! I suppose your world looks just like it.


No, I didnt see anything. I saw a bunch of rocks. I saw a post later where someone thinks a lizard is there lol.

Still waiting on an explanation on what Im supposed to be seeing



[edit on 4-1-2007 by admriker444]



posted on Jan, 4 2007 @ 07:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by admriker444
No, I didnt see anything. I saw a bunch of rocks. I saw a post later where someone thinks a lizard is there lol.
Still waiting on an explanation on what Im supposed to be seeing


Hmmm well if you really want an explanation, best thing to do is check out my website... seeing as all 60 some pages and the anomalies found have been collected and explained there...

So just how much of the thread did you say you have been following?

Here is a pretty rock for you...




And here is the access to the collection

The Living Moon



posted on Jan, 4 2007 @ 08:34 PM
link   
Okay, I visited that site and i still dont see anything.

Its a human condition to see shapes and form he can recognize in nature.

All I see are a bunch of blurry pictures with rocks.

Why is it whenever Im told there are picture evidence out there, its always a blurry picture on low resolution. Show me a clear picture of an actual dome and not what appears to be some sorta glare. Or maybe a picture of an alien walking out a door and then I'll believe there's an alien presence on the moon.

I find it hard to believe Bush and NASA are going to build a base on the moon knowing aliens are there. From what Ive read, the moon/alien rumor states that we were warned away from space and putting weapons in space. So why would Bush test the aliens and risk letting the secret get out.



posted on Jan, 4 2007 @ 09:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by admriker444 From what Ive read, the moon/alien rumor states that we were warned away from space and putting weapons in space. So why would Bush test the aliens and risk letting the secret get out.


This "rumor" is not actively promoted by myself and the others who share my opinion. True, I keep the options open, but I do not immediatly accept it as the primary explanation. I have gone over this countless times in other threads.

I also don't believe Bush is as proactive in space as you make him out to be, and therefore is also not a primary motivation for putting a base on the Moon. If you do your homework, you will find our capabilities are far more advanced than the public is aware of, and from a very early stage.

Learning to see more than "just rocks" involves the same discipline as learning popular conspiricies are purposely promoted to serve as a red herring.



posted on Jan, 4 2007 @ 11:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by admriker444

Okay, I visited that site and i still dont see anything.

Its a human condition to see shapes and form he can recognize in nature.

All I see are a bunch of blurry pictures with rocks.



That's because We do not see things as they are, we see things as we are



posted on Jan, 5 2007 @ 12:29 AM
link   
Apollo Image Atlas, 70mm Hasselblad Image Catalog.htm

CATALOG NUMBER

AS17-133-20332HR

I WOULD APPRECIATE GOING OVER THIS WITH SOMEONE.

ANY OPINION WOULD BE APPRECIATED.



posted on Jan, 5 2007 @ 12:56 AM
link   


FOR THOSE PERSONS INTERESTED THE ORIGINAL PHOTOGRAPH CAN BE FOUND AT

Apollo Image Atlas, 70mm Hasselblad Image Catalog

CATALOG NUMBER AS17-133-20332HR

INCLUDED WITH THIS NOTE IS ANOTHER STRANGE OBJECT, IT APPEARS TO BE A SQUARE?



posted on Jan, 5 2007 @ 01:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Telos

Originally posted by admriker444

Okay, I visited that site and i still dont see anything.

Its a human condition to see shapes and form he can recognize in nature.

All I see are a bunch of blurry pictures with rocks.



That's because We do not see things as they are, we see things as we are


Do you see your house? How about the clothes on your body? What about the color of your eyes? How about the street in front of your house? Does it look like the street in front of your house in photos? Does your wife agree that it looks like the street in front of your house? If you ask two people to draw a president, if both images look basically the same, are they sharing one mind or is it that the president looks like the president, irregardless? Do i need to say more?

This type of thinking is used aganist people who are seeing things that are legit as well as things that are not legit. To group every anomalie viewed as being from the same sort of "willful" hallucination is the epitome' of falsehoods. I can see mass hallucination as a possibility, but to the extent you are suggesting, it seems just like a ready-made way to dismiss anything you happen to disagree with.



posted on Jan, 5 2007 @ 01:39 AM
link   


Here is another blury rock to look at.

Of course this is just a rock, it is not a million year old piece of broken machinery, or broken device of some kind.

LUNAR PHOTO ATTACHED



posted on Jan, 5 2007 @ 01:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by nnelsosj
Of course this is just a rock, it is not a million year old piece of broken machinery, or broken device of some kind.


BUT OF COURSE IT IS! Care to include the source? Thats what we do here provide the source so others can check on it. Posting a blurry picture of an Alien sleeping is not valid without the source...





[Sorry folkes, the temptation was just to great... I just HAD to do it!
]



posted on Jan, 5 2007 @ 02:18 AM
link   
APOLLO IMAGE CATALOG

AS17-136-20714HR

A real nice artistic flair you applied with the yellow face.

I have observed, some people, those who have a psychological inability to cope with the type of things discussed in this forum. Have, and will maintain perptual denial.



posted on Jan, 5 2007 @ 02:18 AM
link   
LOL NASA at it again... making fakes


And there is that nasty term again... ISRU... Get used to it... its the key word that is in all NASA , LPI and others documents...

None of that stuff they are mining up there will ever see the light of Earth.

science.nasa.gov...




[edit on 5-1-2007 by zorgon]



posted on Jan, 5 2007 @ 02:23 AM
link   
The Master Race is knee deep in it.

They have the "evolutionary" right to use up the resources, not share them with the rest of us low lifers on the surface, in their trek to expand into the solar system and the universe (i mean, we gotta have "human" seed (really, more likely they are hybrid) elsewhere or random chance will snuff us out when an asteroid hits and forces a mass extinction. So, enter stage left, the Master Race guys, who are valiantly leading the way to the future. Ignore the part where you're not invited. In fact, they don't want you to know they are already up there, using up the resources. No wonder they're all gunho for Mars. Gotta get there before there's no ISRU to use on the Moon. Like a viral spread, use up resources, next planet. Use up resources, next moon. (include in "Resources" the laborers who work to put them in their positions to begin with and who they thank by abandoning them for being ignorant savages)



[edit on 5-1-2007 by undo]



posted on Jan, 5 2007 @ 02:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by nnelsosj
I have observed, some people, those who have a psychological inability to cope with the type of things discussed in this forum. Have, and will maintain perptual denial.


And this means what exactly? The "type" of things discussed in THIS forum are the possibility of mining operations on the Moon and other bases that are made BY US and manned BY US with the possible help of Aliens. Most in here are not in denial of anything, there just happen to be two viewpoints, one side for the other against

And the oppositions is waivering



new topics

top topics



 
164
<< 62  63  64    66  67  68 >>

log in

join