It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS

page: 36
164
<< 33  34  35    37  38  39 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 01:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by papajake


I guess I wasn't very clear about where my 'facility' was. Here is more of a general view. The facility in in the dark area just above center in this picture. Take your time, the facility is huge.



Okay, I took my time. But I didn't find your faculty. I did, however, find something that looks more like a fortress. Plus a bunch of other things.

It's a big file:

northstar-autoparts.com...




posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 04:32 AM
link   



Originally posted by papajake
It's a big file:

northstar-autoparts.com...


Well I had a little time to look around on the image you have posted papajake and found
a few areas above left from pig's head point and above right from Floating hockey Puck.

There appears to be two major venting areas and a drilling and or mining operation into
the side of the crater wall. A machine with large piping leads up to the wall face and there
appears to be a refuse pipe or some form of drainage spewing out something which all
trickles down the side and collects below.

To the left is one of the smaller vents and below it is a crescent shaped structure/rock with
some large piping following the lower contours and ending up in the shadows. It's here
in the shadows that a face that resembles almost the "Macintosh" face is hiding. I find
this extremely hard to believe, but then again I have a hard time believing the "Pig's
Head Point" area, but there it is.. The structures, yes ok, I can be swayed to believe
those existing on the moon.. But why on earth would there be these other 'iconic'
images?

I'm having a major brain flatulence moment trying to inculcate that this is real even though
I'm locating some of these areas..

Well back to the hunt, first example is a zoomed/cropped unfiltered, the second is filtered
and the curious area being colorized.

ORIGINAL Zoom/Cropped


Area Colorized




posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 05:05 AM
link   


Moon people buried on the moon?

[edit on 18-10-2006 by Mulder_C]

[edit on 18-10-2006 by Mulder_C]

[edit on 18-10-2006 by Mulder_C]


[edit on 18-10-2006 by Mulder_C]



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 05:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear...Some call it remote viewing. Try it. It works.


I have the CRV manual on my desktop. I call it PMSp or Poor Man's Space program


We could have a field day w/this!



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 05:17 AM
link   

Originally posted by Access Denied

Originally posted by zorgon
landoflegends.us...
landoflegends.us...


And just so you know, I asked Springer if he would be interested in hosting my copy of this image (it’s HUGE) here on ATS but he isn't.

Admin Edit #2 The reason we aren't interested in hosting these NASA images is because they are easily found on NASAs website.
[edit on 10-15-2006 by Springer]


Funny that you say that Springer. I wanted to do some comparison between JL's frame and those found on NASA website..but here's what I got:

The key words were II-162-h3. Any other name of the frame (like LO2-H162-3a) yielded no result.
www.google.com...

The first link is form lunar photo of the day and the second one is not working!
On the lunar photo of the day site there is only a small version of the picture, but luckily, it had a link to the NASA's site

Ok...there you get a link for a small giff and for a 1MB Tiff file....but the link for the tiff file is not working!

Next, I saw on the lunar photo of the day site that this picture was named picture of the century. Ok, let's do a search with that name. (I included also NASA in the search, since I want the picture from NASA - the key words used: nasa "Photo of the Century")

the results from my image search:
images.google.com... 20%22Photo%20of%20the%20Century%22&sa=N&tab=wi
Just a 208 by 699 pixels frame....

Now, for the simple search results:
www.google.com...
Can you point me to a high res image found on NASA's website?

I guess that using the official naming for the frame would have got me to the source of the frame...but unfortunately for me...it didn't! Also, using other search engines like yahoo, lycos, askjeevs, altavista, hotbot did not yielded different results. So...if the frame can easily be found on NASA's site...Springer, can you provide a working link for that?

I noticed that Acces Denied's frame is of better resolution than these found on this thread:
For instance, take a look at these two pictures:

This is form the initial frame that you provided, enlarged 2 times using the B-spline method.

This is what Acces Denied posted


"crane"



You can clearly see that he has a better resolution image.



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 10:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by Apass

This is what Acces Denied posted


"crane"



You can clearly see that he has a better resolution image.


I see the first one much clearer actually and we also have these that I have in the collection on my website that were posted here.






And here is the same crane top view in C#5







Quite frankly I do not understand what your and access denied's agenda is here in your vehemence to disprove the existance of the possibility of the mining operation. If you cannot see what we are showing, nor wish to accept it thats fine, but the rest of us are enjoying the hunt and ARE seeing the anomalies.

The NASA image is available if you hunt, I also have a complete description available on page one of my site that gives full detail of how the imgae was created, scales and time differences between c#1-c#4 and c#5



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 11:09 AM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear
I was fortunate to go through a remote viewing class taught by Angela Thompson Smith (one of the foremost remote viewers of our time). It was one of the most interesting experiences of my life.


It is interesting to note at this time... while researching the possibilities of stargates [another thread] I cam across THID entry... seems the US Military had the term Stargate long before the movie or the TV series...


Late 60's actually and it dealt with Remote Viewing



The Military Use of RV, Stargate and the CIA FOIA documents

Project Stargate



Now then is anyone besides John, Matyas and myself getting the "big" picture yet?



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 11:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by papajake
They could be really big people.


That will really help out credibilty


What say 60 foot tall or so? Hmmmmm



Did I look at the wrong area? I thought it was the exact area of the photo John posted. Zorgon, where is the area located in the photo you posted?


NO No No you had the right area that John posted... but that became the boneyard remember


The area I posted is down and to the right of that [will be on map later]

The new one John posted I haven't had time to look at Way to many anomalies to track... my keyboard is wearing out trying to keep up




I'm curious, did the original 16x20 inch negative have the horizontal spices in them? Also, is there any way we could scan original negative in one piece?


Please take a look at the image data I posted
landoflegends.us...

they are NOT splice strips they are SCAN lines... the image is captured on 70 mm film proccessed on the Orbiter onboard Bimat proccesor... then the finnished film is scanned by a video scanner in strips. Then it is transmitted to Earth via radio where the scan result is printed.

The C#1-#4 were are working with is ONE IMAGE [part of three] The orbiter took three snapshots which are assembled into one image BUT the area we are looking at is FRAME 3 of the set I repeat ONE IMAGE... that means what you see at the bottom [C#3-C#4] IS CLOSER to the lens than C#1 and C#2

Here is to three assembled LO-II-162-123



Here is the FULL IMAGE - LO-II-162-H3



And for those that just don't visit the collection...


Here is how the camera works... [The original film crashed on the Moon]




posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 12:15 PM
link   
So glad i checked back in...
Thanks for the word John, I hadn't realized this thread had progressed so much...

You guys do great work...


I am seeing even more things than you all, and can only hope they are processing artifacts, rather then real ones, or else this whole thing just got interesting...

Did you all notice the "glints" off the surrounding peaks...
wonder if they are metalic rovers, or other man-made reflective surface, or perhaps actual points of light.



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 12:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by LazarusTheLong

Did you all notice the "glints" off the surrounding peaks...
wonder if they are metalic rovers, or other man-made reflective surface, or perhaps actual points of light.


Yes there are many "glints" of bright reflections and or lights... I just don't have the time to clip them all... and I certainly haven't found them all yet either. Soo.. now that your here... and you see LOTS maybe you can share
Save me a little work...

And no they are not all processing glitches... found those, found the water spots, the dust fibers, and most important the annoying watermarks that plague close up resolution..

BUT once you get past all that... there are hundreds left to work with...


BTW this is off topic and I did a new thread...buty I wanted to share this with the "luny crowd"


Amazing UFO Video - Nanjing



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 12:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon
I see the first one much clearer actually and we also have these that I have in the collection on my website that were posted here.

Errr...how can you not see that acces denied's picture has more detail in it?? It's not about where the crane is! It's about the image resolution!!!!
OK, here I used AD's frame and I cropped the same portion form JL's picture and enlarged it 1.5 times and got this animated gif. And you can clearly see the AD's picture is of higher resolution!




Quite frankly I do not understand what your and access denied's agenda is here in your vehemence to disprove the existance of the possibility of the mining operation. If you cannot see what we are showing, nor wish to accept it thats fine, but the rest of us are enjoying the hunt and ARE seeing the anomalies.

I too can see many of your "anomalies" but that doesn't mean that they are there. And it was not only me and AD who said it, but those anomalies are the result of the way our brain recognizes the things. If you want to find anomalies you will certainly find them in any kind of image (as long as it is not computer generated)!



The NASA image is available if you hunt, I also have a complete description available on page one of my site that gives full detail of how the imgae was created, scales and time differences between c#1-c#4 and c#5


If you say the NASA image is available...can you point me to it? Can you show me a high resolution image? As you can see AD has one.



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 12:48 PM
link   
Originally posted by zorgon




BTW this is off topic and I did a new thread...buty I wanted to share this with the "luny crowd"


Amazing UFO Video - Nanjing



That looks like 'ours'.



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 12:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

That will really help out credibilty


What say 60 foot tall or so? Hmmmmm



What would you say if I could actually find a giant astronaut-looking image? Actually, and better yet, I'm going to pull a John Lear (no offense, John. I enjoy the hunt!) and see if you can find it. It's above the boneyard/ring area. It's climbing the side of the mountain near the "cherry on top" section that I posted a couple days ago.



NO No No you had the right area that John posted... but that became the boneyard remember


I understand, and I found (I think) the area John was talking about. I posted my findings, which includes what appears to be a massive building. Here's the link:

northstar-autoparts.com...


they are NOT splice strips they are SCAN lines... the image is captured on 70 mm film proccessed on the Orbiter onboard Bimat proccesor... then the finnished film is scanned by a video scanner in strips. Then it is transmitted to Earth via radio where the scan result is printed.


Okay, so now I'm questioning where all our tax dollars are going.



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 01:13 PM
link   
Originally posted by Mulder_C



Moon people buried on the moon?



No thats the Monster Dump in my previous post. Don't you see him spitting out all that garbage? I guess we could call it the Lear Dump also.





posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 02:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by johnlear
I was fortunate to go through a remote viewing class taught by Angela Thompson Smith (one of the foremost remote viewers of our time). It was one of the most interesting experiences of my life.


It is interesting to note at this time... while researching the possibilities of stargates [another thread] I cam across THID entry... seems the US Military had the term Stargate long before the movie or the TV series...


Late 60's actually and it dealt with Remote Viewing



The Military Use of RV, Stargate and the CIA FOIA documents

Project Stargate



Now then is anyone besides John, Matyas and myself getting the "big" picture yet?


I saw this just last night, the word Stargate, when I went to look up a remote viewing manual. That looks very hard to learn btw. I didnt read enough to grasp the concept. But presumably, you need the coordinates of a location, to tap into the signals? I suppose there is logic in this, being that everything gets sent out to space, like sound waves etc, and is "recorded".



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 02:39 PM
link   
Originally posted by violet



I saw this just last night, the word Stargate, when I went to look up a remote viewing manual. That looks very hard to learn btw. I didnt read enough to grasp the concept. But presumably, you need the coordinates of a location, to tap into the signals? I suppose there is logic in this, being that everything gets sent out to space, like sound waves etc, and is "recorded".



Violet you don't necessarily need coordinates and there are no 'signals' to tap into. That is one way of tasking, CRV, coordinate remote viewing. But this is not the only way to remote view. And you don't need to be tasked. That is just another way to do it. You can learn how to do it yourself. Don't think this is complicated, its not. Even I could do it and I mean real quick.






posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 06:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by johnlear

That is just another way to do it. You can learn how to do it yourself. Don't think this is complicated, its not. Even I could do it and I mean real quick.


That sounds like an invitation.
Mr Lear, I (and many others, i am sure) would love to know more of your personal experience and abilities in this area.

thank you
laz



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 08:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by Apass...but those anomalies are the result of the way our brain recognizes the things.


Apass, I welcome your antithesis. Truth be known, we know far too little about the Natural World to explain all phenomena. Only the concerted input of all perspectives will render the big picture in its entirity.

With this encouragement it is my hope that you will continue on with us in spite of sporadic flourishes of swordplay. In the end all we have is each other.

[thinking]placement of objects in geometric patterns creates jump points for electric charges...[/thinking]



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 08:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Matyas
[thinking]placement of objects in geometric patterns creates jump points for electric charges...[/thinking]


LOL I am going to have to nickname you "Sparky" and you never did send me the RV Manual


Apass has just picked up the torch for Access Denied... seems he id living up to his name


And my sword is still peace tied



posted on Oct, 18 2006 @ 11:09 PM
link   
Hello Mr. Lear, greetings from Argentina.

This is a very interesting thread . I dont see a lot (most) of the suppossed artifacts in the pics, but some of them look very interesting. The "Machine & Smoke" at the left of the Top Ridge AB in the Copernicus1_labeled looks incredible. Have you shown this particular "artifact" to some scientist or astronomer? I guess there is no way that it can be a rock, some shadows, or anything like that. Its cleary some type of instalation or facility, its like a rectangular box, hiper cleary. Its an amazing find indeed.

I wonder if you have noticed this and what do you think of it.

Im sorry for my english.
Thank you in advance



new topics

top topics



 
164
<< 33  34  35    37  38  39 >>

log in

join