John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS

Errr...I see only black and white specks....Oh...I got it! I see elephant teeth and elephant dropings....

edited for spelling

[edit on 3/10/06 by Apass]

[edit on 3-10-2006 by johnlear]

[edit on 3-10-2006 by johnlear]

Now, let me see if I can get those dancing elephants a little bigger.

OK all you guys that are probably making fun of me! Here are those dancing elephants I promised you. TAKE THAT!!!!

I've been telling you people, but you don't listen..... They're here for the nuts... Just give into their demands and live a happier life...


Back on topic, I'd like to thank Mr John Lear for his continued contributions to this site and the UFO community in General.

Err...like I said...I see only black and white specks.
And I don't get it. Why would there be a shape like an elephant on the moon? What for? I mean...go ahead, try to find anomalies on the moon or mars...but all I can see is that either there are no anomalies at all (and all the images posted here are only poor quality cropped/zoomed pictures) or the aliens that made them used our moon as a space dumpsite....where you can find elephants, space shutles, sphinx, door handles, crains and so on and on...without any logic.

Originally posted by Apass







You forgot the butler.

Forget the butler. Just enlighten me. For what reason are all those shapes on the moon? (Why are them anomalies and not some kind of Rorschach inkblot test for a bunch of ATSers?)

is this a joke???

can some draw some lines around these "elephants"???

Does the dancing elephants bit not prove this is all peoples brains playing tricks? The imagination letting you see what you want to? Why are their no clearly defined, undesputable images amongst the shadows and rocks? I think we all know why and some cant admit it...........

These are the 2 photos of Endymion. The one on the left was was taken by the Lick Observatory (presumably with the Yerkes 36") in 1946. The one on the right was taken later. Probably.

In the left photo of Endymion you can make out what appears to be part of an ancient or decaying structure which might have been part of a dome at the 12 o'clock position and another one at the 4 o'clock position. The picture appears a little hazy and the haze may be from the giant explosion to the northwest.

In the photo on the right, which was presumably taken later shows a clearer crater but at the 12 o'clock position where we saw what might have been structure we see some black marking or short lines. On the inner face of the crater extending from about 1 o'clock to 2 o'clock we see a black marking which may extend further around clockwise but is obscured by 4 black vertical markings which appear to be obscuring what may have been part of a dome structure at 4 o'clock. The black markings do not appear to be normal or a part of the photograph. The markings appear to be crude attempts to obscure something on or in or near the crater.

Whats interesting is that they went to great lengths to obscure portions of Endymion but completely neglected the archway or bridge to the northwest.

I would appreciate your comments.

Originally posted by Access Denied






AD, I am publically admitting I hoaxed the Krill papers.

I, john Lear publically hoaxed the Krill papers. (signed) John Lear

Now, please tell what that means.

Does that mean I wrote the Krill papers with John Grace?
Does it mean I wrote the Krill papers and put John's name on them?
If John and I made up the name Krill does that constitute a hoax?


All I want to know AD is what am I admitting to? Fair enough?

I'll second that...Tremendous contribution to the academic and scholarly pursuit of a universal mystery!!!

Yes, the sarcasm oozes off of the page........

An incredibly effective security blanket and information blackout hides a "space corp" from the world for 3 decades. Zip, nada, zilch evidence exists that other planets in this solar system have an Earth-like ecosystem, with comparable gravity, atmosphere, and life. But, incredibly enough, these photos happen to 'slip' through with the lamest evidence of structures and activity on the Earth's moon. In all of this...how did the photos miss the alleged, 6 mile high tower.....allegedly located dead center on Near Side?

Hey look!!!....Them's footprints!!!!

Originally posted by MrPenny






I take it you didn't like my dancing elephants?

that was a joke???

i am so confused right now:

we don't know who gave john lear these photos that are supposed to be super top secret...

all these photos are in black and white and are bad quality...

i can't make out anything that other ATSers claim to see...

im tired...

Originally posted by Access Denied



No. Thats fairly accurate except as I said previously on other threads John wrote the paper and I helped him with the name. I suggested Krill from CRLLL (the alien the Pentagon was allegedly talking to), and John came up with O.H. which Bill claimed stood for Original Hostage which in fact stood for nothing.

So, again, what was the hoax? Was it the name we pulled out of thin air? Was it what Krill said?

Thanks to all for the time spent providing this thread.
I have really enjoyed the info provided.

Thought you all might want to check out what memmber MMC at UFOCASEBOOK FORUM has done with the www.nrl.navy.mil... moon photos.

Some very facinating photos after enhancements.

I really can't see any elephants! But there's a really cute puppy-dog, further down in this crater, at the 5 o'clock position! I think you can find all kinds of things if you keep looking at it too long. This moon picture could really be a giant chocloate chip cookie !!

Harry55,

Thanks for the link. Interesting stuff they did with photos straight from the pictures on the navy's website.

John Lear,

I'm getting tired of saying this, but thank you for your posts. Some people obviously don't know the difference between sarcasm (dancing elephants on the moon) and serious investigation into these moon pictures. Some of the anomalies are very obscure, some are very obvious. Whether all or none are something, I believe some are something. Thats enough for me to say something is wrong here.
I'll admit i'm not blindly following and believing everything that is posted, but no one has come up with any logical reason to discredit the photos except "we don't know where these photos really came from". If someone did, I would walk away from this thread no questions asked. Until then, keep it up John!

John,

Were you talking about this area here?



Looks like some kind of strange shadow/blotch near the center of the picture.