Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by stew4media
Hi If you want to see the Moon in some real detail look here.
LRO Target Map
Link here to show how to use it quickly.
Resolution is up to 50cm/pixel will not be long till full Moon has been pictured at this resolution none of John Lear's claimed Moon buildings
,roads,quarries or machines have shown up yet
Most people who follow this stuff over any length of time speculate that an ongoing coverup has been applied to the subject of ancient (or even
current) artificial structures on the Moon.
The theory is that during the 1960's and 1970's, outside of establishment agencies and organisations there was virtually no access to the levels of
technology available to anyone today.
The coverup specifically in relation to imagery of the Moon taken during the 1960's and 1970's was in effect, but was very crude and
unsophisticated..basic manipulation to 'revealing' images was even carried out using sticky tape placed over sections, and very crude and manual
editing by eye...of course, nobody in the general public had access to digital means of enhancement, and the best that was available was a magnifying
glass to look at the fairly low quality images.
NASA and the rest, couldn't foresee the levels of computing power available at our fingertips today, so the crude editing and obfuscation they used
back then was adequate to hide the most obvious anomalies, with the much less obvious ones being overlooked and considered unimportant.
Those harder to recognise anomalies are easier to see now with the technology at our disposal of course.
Too late for the coverup types, as all the images were released during the low tech period...so they are out in the wild so to speak.
That's not the case for recent and future imagery though is it..which means of course, that 50cm/pixel or even 1cm/pixel res isn't going to make the
slightest difference to debunking ANYTHING, as the theory quite clearly incorporates obfuscation, which is now very sophisticated indeed...much higher
tech is available to those doing the hiding, than for those doing the searching...it's like a complete 180 compared to the images from 5 or 6 decades
Even the Human element has been removed to a degree, as powerful and dedicated software is tasked with obscuring these anomalies, and it is far more
effective than the Human eye at locating and then convincingly hiding what it finds.
If someone believes a coverup is in effect, they are certainly not going to believe imagery is not being expertly tampered with by agencies with
Billions at their disposal if that is their intent are they?
Even 1mm/pixel resolution wouldn't make a blind difference to finding anomalies or reasonably be thought of as a difinitive tool to debunk or prove
the non-existence of Lunar anomalies, if the technology designed to hide them is advancing at the same rate as the image quality...which it probably
A cover-up is a cover-up...the reasons for it don't ultimately matter, the fact that it happens is what's important.
edit on 14-5-2013 by MysterX because: added text