It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by eyewitness86
I knew you would not read the evidence and see the pics..
I had a feeling you were exactly what you are: An opinion without a spine.
You want no evidence
you only want to assuage your pompous confidence in your ability to find truth in your mind instead of the facts.
I am happy to puch the Ignore button for you, as you have entered the place now ehere you cannot be taken seriously, and what you say should be ighnored totally and your views regarded as nothing more than the ravings of an uneducated mind.
Originally posted by Matyas
Well, Z knows, but I have doubts about a reactor, unless it is tremendously powerful, but then you have the Sun, so why all the effort? I pointed this out eons ago.
I think it may be some sort of transmitter, and the glowie is near field phenomena.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Where are the spectra of the Cherenkov radiation you said were matching with the Russian measurements from 1957? Huh?
Originally posted by Matyas
Well, Z knows, but I have doubts about a reactor, unless it is tremendously powerful, but then you have the Sun, so why all the effort? I pointed this out eons ago.
I think it may be some sort of transmitter, and the glowie is near field phenomena.
Originally posted by zorgon
Breaking News
Hole in Space Suit Astronaut Survives
Pictures at Eleven!!!
Gotta love those Russians!!!
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Where did you hear that, Zorgon? What do you know about radiation? And what does become clear to you? You are still stuck at the pre-school level of "oh wow, it glows, it must be radiation and/or aliens", and you have the nerve to drop awkward hints about my mental capacity. Sheesh.
Wait, the article is dated 24 June 2004, don't you think the news is stale?
Originally posted by zorgon
Hey since your a PhD and all that you might want to add your expertise to this thread about stargates, wormholes and faster than light thingies...
Seems other physicists are finally discovering reality... You might want to keep up to date
Originally posted by buddhasystem...I'm quite up to date with what I do:
atlas.ch...
Originally posted by zorgon
Same spectral signature as in Cherenkov Radiation
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Again, Zorgon, could you kindly provide a curve describing the Cherenkov spectrum as you propose it exists in this crater, and an estimate of how much gas is needed to produce the "glow" based on some baseline assumption about the particle flux.
Originally posted by SpijkerMuis
Say, BS, smart as you are, can't you produce a curve describing the Cherenkov spectrum?
Or maybe one of your fellow scientist there at Atlas can if you're not up to it?
Unless you're responsibe for the catering
Hey Zorgon,
Please indulge a dumb question.
Why would there need to be a nuclear reactor on the Moon if we already have reverse-engineered or have been given access to advanced technology? I am not trying to argue here, I would like to hear something that makes sense out of all the theories being bandied about.
Nuclear 'fission' seems an unlikely candidate for efficient power sources in a colony, or in a spacecraft. (I am assuming, of course, that the radiation source being discussed on this thread is referring to a fission reactor of some kind. I had thought that any advanced fusion reactor would have no emissions, other than the energy it was designed to produce).
Originally posted by weedwhacker
Hey Zorgon,
Please indulge a dumb question.
Why would there need to be a nuclear reactor on the Moon if we already have reverse-engineered or have been given access to advanced technology?
I am not trying to argue here, I would like to hear something that makes sense out of all the theories being bandied about.
The idea of an element, a stable version of 115, has been postulated as potentially a source for sustained power, possibly fusion-based?
we must also consider the energy sources used to power and operate the vessels that are both Interplanetary and Interstellar.
Nuclear 'fission' seems an unlikely candidate for efficient power sources in a colony, or in a spacecraft. (I am assuming, of course, that the radiation source being discussed on this thread is referring to a fission reactor of some kind.
I had thought that any advanced fusion reactor would have no emissions, other than the energy it was designed to produce).
Hope you can clear some of this up, perhaps I missed a post or three, and if so, just provide links and save yourself some time!!