It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CygnificCopernicus Grid# E4
Originally posted by johnlear
How much longer until the hi-res?
Cygnific, let me say again that this effort of yours to put the Copernicus photos in 3D is absolutely brilliant. I see at least twice as much as did before. Many thanks for your effort it is greatly appreciated!
Originally posted by greatlakes
You've got to be kidding right? Does anyone else see ALL or EVEN ANY of these amazing objects in this, or in the negative of this image? I certainly do not. Is there some other hi-res version you're looking at to arrive at all of your object conclusions?
A Toilet? (ok I hope you were kidding by the smiley face, but I wonder)
Originally posted by greatlakes
Also speaking about scale issues, just how big would the so-called WHEEL be in that image?
You are very welcome John. It's only possible because you gave the originals to us. I was very surprised also by the amount of detail you see this way. Zorgon has all Hi-res now i think except Copernicus #5. NASA really did a lot of work on #5. And i'm trying to remove the 'mask' they used to hide some 'stuff' (not the black paint). There is a amazing amount of 'stuff' on that picture.
Do you have more pictures of Copernicus?
Originally posted by greatlakes
Where is the airbrushing?
Also, is this a 'T' anomaly or a 'FACE' anomaly? How does this interpret in the other Copernicus images?
Originally posted by Cygnific Do you have 3D glasses?
[edit on 30/5/2007 by Cygnific]
Originally posted by greatlakes
Originally posted by Cygnific Do you have 3D glasses?
[edit on 30/5/2007 by Cygnific]
Yea but there a cheapie pair paper and plastic job. I'll have to dig them out. I think they are red and green...
Originally posted by johnlear
The people that were airbrushing and otherwise tampering with Copernicus 5 probably didn't realize that it was a photo taken directly overhead of Copernicus 1, 2, 3, and 4. So the result was that little details they left unairbrushed because they thought them too insignificant would confirm what is seen in the oblique view.
For instance they knew that the 'parking garge' was highly incriminating so they eliminated that from #5. But some of the cranes they didn't. One of the cranes became the original 'smoking gun' which, seen in Copernicus #1 was confirmed in Copernicus #5.
Originally posted by greatlakes
Also speaking about scale issues,
Originally posted by Cygnific
Load it in a paint program and zoom in, and use 3D glasses. Then you will see the black paint didn't take all spots that show something. Do you have 3D glasses?
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Cygnific
Load it in a paint program and zoom in, and use 3D glasses. Then you will see the black paint didn't take all spots that show something. Do you have 3D glasses?
I doubt that there is anything we could show that would convince greatlakes...:shk:
I will check my email now for those hi res, but I won't be able to upload them till this evening as I have a contract for 1pm today
Originally posted by realyweely...Simply because they dont speak up and say so doesnt mean they arent laughing.
Originally posted by realyweely
Sorry to burst your bubble but I doubt there is anything you could show myself and a lot of other people here that will convince us. Simply because they dont speak up and say so doesnt mean they arent laughing.
What method did you use to create the 3D version of the photos?
Originally posted by Cygnific
Look at MY photo above this post with 3D Glasses, you will see the black airbrush marks FLOAT above the picture, because it was added later on the negative. If you want to burst my bubble tell me why that is happening if it was an original unedited photo.