John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS

Zarniwoop,

I never thought to examine the shadows! Surely a good way to find anomalies.

Excellent idea.

Originally posted by Zarniwoop
This is what appears to be a V-shaped shadow or otherwise anomalous feature in Mare Orientale. Although, obviously nothing nearby is producing a shadow

It is the edge of a mountain wall.

Hmm, looking at the Mare Orientale picture a bit closer, this weird looking thing even casts a shadow.

Originally posted by Cygnific
Hmm, looking at the Mare Orientale picture a bit closer, this weird looking thing even casts a shadow.

ALOT of anomalies in this picture. Look in the upper left hand section and also to the south and a tiny tiny bit west of the anomalie you have indicated. Both of those sections are loaded with anomalous .....things. I'm gonna have a closer look at this one.

Originally posted by Cygnific



It is the edge of a mountain wall.

Ah... Good catch. It's much easier to see in the gif you posted

Originally posted by undo
Zarniwoop,

I never thought to examine the shadows! Surely a good way to find anomalies.

Excellent idea.

Oh oh now were in trouble

Nice to see you back Zari...

Not only the weird "rock" there, but also something else doesn't seem right.

Picture nr.1 original link:
www.lpi.usra.edu...
Picture nr.2 original link (12mb gz file):
astrogeology.usgs.gov...

Originally posted by undo
Zarniwoop,

I never thought to examine the shadows! Surely a good way to find anomalies.

Excellent idea.

Why, thank you Undo

I typically look first at direction of sunlight on any given photo to get my bearings, then look for anything making a shadow... then determine whether the shadow is cast below or on the surface based on the sunlight direction.

Originally posted by zorgon

Oh oh now were in trouble

Nice to see you back Zarni...

Thanks, Z

Originally posted by Cygnific
Not only the weird "rock" there, but also something else doesn't seem right.

Hmmm the Case of the moving Spheres Interesting....

Where there ever pictures released from the right side of Copernicus? The ones on the first page has the left to middle only. The right side has alot of interesting spots it seems, by looking at the lowres NASA picture that shows the whole crater.

For anyone who remembers ( or cares ), I finally found the NASA source of that picture on the Pat Rawlings site I found under the lunar base section.

My posting from March on the subject...

www.abovetopsecret.com...

and the picture from PatRawlings.com...



Turns out its the area around the Apollo 17 Taurus-Littrow landing site.

www.hq.nasa.gov...


This had me curious because it was his only actual photo (all of his stuff is painting) on Pat's site, filed under "lunar base", with no explanation. Thought maybe he had a secret photo... Oh well.

I still would like to see a high res version of this area though.

Only thing of value I found from the NASA site image was this HUGE sculpture of an alien smoking a cigar ( Oh...Rik?)

cygnific,

Copernicus

www.lpi.usra.edu... pg

www.lpi.usra.edu... pg

Any use to you?



[edit on 17-5-2007 by smartie]

Something I found from a soviet mission photos taken from Zond-7. Not sure how reliable these are but still if you look at the upper right corner of the picture where the darkness takes over there seems to be a massive cylinder/dome with a logo of somekind on it. Also the surrounding area from the "cylinder/dome" seems kinda odd.

www.mentallandscape.com...

www.darkstormguild.com...



[edit on 18-5-2007 by Gonjo]

Originally posted by smartie
cygnific,

Copernicus



Any use to you?

Thanks Smartie, i had them allready Copernicus is a nice crater and it's tobad there are very few really good closeup's of it.

Originally posted by Cygnific
Copernicus is a nice crater and it's to bad there are very few really good closeup's of it.

DOH! Now I wonder why THAT would be?

Here is one from Apollo 17 that shows more of the right side...
AS17-151-23260



It is discussed and compared here...

www.landoflegends.us...

It is one we used to show the "graded roadway" of the mining operation in two images... one the original JL pic of this thread and the other an Apollo 17 version... the roadway is there in both

Thanks for the Apollo 17 shot of Copernicus Zorgon.

If I am not mistaken, there would appear an almost perfect image of a human face on the crater wall. It is on a part that is shaded from sunlight.

That's apart from all the mining machinery etc in the vicinity.

Perhaps Rik Riley can highlight it as he is good at spotting faces/statues ?

Do we have examples of known impacts on Earth where the bottom is perfectly flat? OK, maybe not perfectly, but look at how flat the Copernicus crater floor is. What does NASA use to explain how flat it is?

There are obvious explanations more mundane that Aliens, such as electrical impacts, etching, etc. Then there is moon mining....

But how does it happen naturally in an environment where there is no weathering?

Why does the land of legends website redirect me to the fbi site ?

try this in your browser:

www.landoflegends.us...

And then, try this:

www.landoflegends.us...


What is this? Who is the author of this site? What is the meaning of this?

[edit on 19-5-2007 by Orion437]

[edit on 19-5-2007 by Orion437]

Its the sites way at a haha, when a user attempts to navigate up the sites tree and is forbidden, the page comes up and redirects you to the fbi site...

Its kinda funny, I came across it myself before.

Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Do we have examples of known impacts on Earth where the bottom is perfectly flat? OK, maybe not perfectly, but look at how flat the Copernicus crater floor is. What does NASA use to explain how flat it is?

On Earth is difficult to find craters that big that still look like craters because of the erosion or because they are under water.

Those types of craters have a flat bottom because of the melting of the material of the meteor and of the ground, that is why sometimes the bottom of the crater has a different colour, its because it's a different type of rock.

And this explanation is not from NASA.