John Lear's Moon Pictures on ATS, page 114
Pages: <<  111    112    113    114    115    116    117  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 123 times


reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 09:28 AM by undo
From Copernicus 4. gif

Zoom


Zoom/Outlined/Brightened for viewing


Unless this is a watermark, I'd be interested in knowing if anyone recognizes anything in this anomalie.



[edit on 15-3-2007 by undo]


reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 09:47 AM by undo
Also from Copernicus 4. gif


diagonal lines in this anomalie, can't be scan lines, unless the camera took diagonal scans as well as strip scans.



reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 11:39 AM by aZiXx
Originally posted by undo
From Copernicus 4. gif

Zoom


Zoom/Outlined/Brightened for viewing


Unless this is a watermark, I'd be interested in knowing if anyone recognizes anything in this anomalie.



[edit on 15-3-2007 by undo]



I see it. Good find. A very menacing face... of what kind I cannot tell...

If it is not a watermark, this is what I am quite curious about... is it a holographic projection like rikriley picks up... or just a concoction by our minds?

Interesting find none the less.


reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 02:18 PM by DrZERO


reply posted on 15-3-2007 @ 07:31 PM by zorgon
Originally posted by aZiXx
I refrain from mentioning the bad thing in hopes of getting your curiosity aroused and looking into it yourself


I protest. I have enough work to look up myself






I wanted to point out a project about the intentional crashing of satellites powered by radioactive material into unstable bodies.


Oh yes Its become the new sport of those brilliant people at NASA... apparently they jump up and down with glee hugging each other went they hit something...

Never mind they don't really know what they are doing...

Take Deep Impact for example...

"We hit it just exactly where we wanted to," said an ecstatic Dr Don Yeomans, a Nasa mission scientist...

"The impact was bigger than I expected, and bigger than most of us expected. We've got all the data we could possibly ask for." ...

Agency staff working on the $333 Million mission cheered, clapped and hugged when the first pictures of the impact came through to the control room at Nasa's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) in California...

Two stages: Preliminary data indicated two successive flashes.

"What you see is something really surprising. First, there is a small flash, then there's a delay, then there's a big flash and the whole thing breaks loose. We may have been able to detect some structural response to the impact," mission co-investigator Pete Shultz said....

SOURCE BBC News


Okay so tax payers got bilked 333 million to blow a hole in a comet... One thing I see a lot in NASA reports is the results are unexpected. That's scary to me, kinda like shooting in the dark. Rather than create a plume of debris, they created a massive explosion. And what was the second explosion caused by?

Here is a picture of the big bang...



Comet Tempel 1 looks like a lumpy potato covered with craters, the first close-up images from NASA's Deep Impact mission suggest.

The space agency successfully smashed into the comet early Monday in the hopes of examining its frozen core for ice and rock left over from the early solar system.

When the washing machine-sized probe, or "impactor," had its rendezvous with the comet, the collision set off a brighter than expected burst of light in the sky about 130 million kilometres from Earth.

SOURCE CBC News


The Comet looks more like a crater covered Asteroid than a "dirty" snowball

From the Electric Universe... Matyas will like this one

News Item
13 July 2005
Comet Tempel 1's Electrifying Impact

Excerpt:
...Meanwhile, how did the Electric Universe model of comets fare? The two major predictions that the outburst upon impact would be more energetic than expected and the comet is rocky, with little water in its interior, have been supported.

Excerpt:
In stark contrast to NASA scientists, who seem to be perpetually surprised, the adherents of an electrical model of comets have seen many of the quite specific predictions satisfied. How many surprises and disconfirmations of cherished beliefs about comets will it require before a fundamental rethink occurs, instead of mere revision of old ideas? Science works best when there is a plurality of ideas. The present establishment monoculture of ideas is crippling scientific progress.

SOURCE: THE ELECTRIC UNIVERSE

Satellite Comet Crash and the True Nature of the Solar System

Excerpt:
NASA got the brilliant idea of sending a spacecraft to an incoming comet, crashing a probe the size of a truck into the comet and then photographing the result. The result expected was, the probe would produce a crater on the comet. The depth of the crater would help determine what the comet's composition was.

The JPL course correction team was right on target and on July 3, 2005, the Deep Impact probe did indeed impact with comet Tempel 1. How deep the impact was, however, will never be known because instead of a cloud of five billion old debris shooting up and forming a cometary tail, the impact produced one heck of an explosion, one anyone can see by viewing NASA's film, Tempel Fades Into Night, at www.nasa.gov...

The standard comment by empirical science, after showing pictures of the course correction team jumping up and down in glee in the control room worldwide, was, well, it's going to take awhile to digest the results. What this means is, it's going to take awhile to come up with some sort of ridiculous explanation why a giant snowball acted like an atomic bomb when it was hit by a probe ( it didn't take long, after all, they stuck to the script - see the end of the column).

SOURCE


This fellow doesn't have a very high opinion of NASA...

Excerpt:
NOTE: It didn't take long for the empirical wizards to spin their cotton candy. What we clearly see as an explosion (as long as NASA allows it to remain on their site) is a giant plume of gas and dust far richer than expected in carbon compounds. Now how is that for redirecting the argument. These carbon compounds reinforce the view that comets contributed to the raw materials of the accidental life on Earth. Not only is empirical science redirecting the argument, it is doing anything it can to hide its ignorance about the real source of life.

Then the spin goes, the impact threw about 5,500 tons of water into space. Let me ask, did they bottle it? Of course not, they couldn't even measure something like this. It's a trash statement. These nitwits go on to say the density of the comet is very low and the porosity is very high, the texture crumbly, the impactor plowed to a depth of tens of meters (but could not be more specific because of the plume of powder ice and dust (does that look like a plume of ice and dust to you?) and the plume was so thick the crater could not be viewed.

Now listen to this bit of garbage. They think that 75 to 80 percent of the comet is empty space.

But I got to hand it to them for brutal honesty. The press release admitted that the presence of craters on the surface of Tempel 1, craters that looked just like the craters on the moon, were puzzling. Don't worry folks, we'll soon learn those craters are ice boils that mimic craters.

Empirical science is really a gag, and if it didn't involve the nature of the technology that might ensure the survival of the species, it would be something to laugh endlessly about.

SOURCE



Hubble telescope captures image from Earth. Look at the length of time the "flash" stays bright. As The Real Skeptic says... does this really look like a "plume" of dust reflecting sunlight?




Bigger image and description from

Astronomy Picture of the Day

The area encompassing the comet became over two times brighter in the hours after the impact.


As always the collection and review pages are at Pegasus. Page 2 has a whole list of other satellite impacts. I am sure I am missing some though..

PAGE ONE

PAGE TWO


[edit on 15-3-2007 by zorgon]
Pages: <<  111    112    113    114    115    116    117  >>    ^^TOP^^



Newfound "super-Earth"
  Posted 10 days ago with 56 member flags
Enceladus Backlit by Saturn
  Posted 4 days ago with 50 member flags
Toronto teens send Lego man into space: video
  Posted 18 days ago with 28 member flags
Current Potential Habitable Worlds - Update February 2012
  Posted 2 days ago with 24 member flags
Amazing new photo of Earth. The Blue Marble 2012
  Posted 14 days ago with 22 member flags
NASA Probe Captures 1st Video of Moon\'s Far Side
  Posted 11 days ago with 19 member flags
China publishes high-resolution full moon map
  Posted 5 days ago with 19 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

AP: WHITNEY HOUSTON DEAD
  People, Posted 13 hours ago, 95 replies
Why conservatives . . . . . suck!
  Political Ideology, Posted 14 hours ago, 70 replies
IF YOURE AMERICAN!
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 32 replies
London 2012 Olympics Conspiracy
  General Conspiracies, Posted 16 hours ago, 29 replies
Whitney Houston dead at 48
  Breaking General News, Posted 12 hours ago, 26 replies