Originally posted by undo
I've seen other anomalies in the same area. Somewhere in this thread, is a huge picture of it when the blue shimmer is not operating or apparent. At least 20 anomalies (at the very least) are on the floor and along the walls of Aristarchus.

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by Zarniwoop

Z... I would like to request a page dedicated to peekaboos on your landoflegends site. I too am growing fond of the name

Had one already Though I suppose I should add "Peekaboo" on th menu page

PEEKABOO PAGE

Originally posted by zorgon

Originally posted by VType
wow, the last couple posts full of pictures of rocks has been obvious crap. those are rocks, darlings....

on 8-3-2007 by jetflock]
I also see less in these latest images and really have to imagine more than Id like too.

Here's the thing...

The Case for Rocks:

Many say "They are just rocks..."

1) If they were anything other than rocks why would NASA leave these in a whole set of images when we know that they "sanitize" images?
2) Some of the anomalies on close inspection do indeed look like they are rocks, albeit ones with very unique shapes.

Examples



[imlandoflegends.us...[/im]

The Case for Artifacts:

1) Richard Hoagland of Enterprise Mission has identified them as metallic artifacts. That alone will convince many people...
2) There are many pieces of this puzzle that do not fit the rock hypothesis. There are shapes and textures that are not consistent with rock formations. while it is possible that rocks may form in other crystallization patterns on the Moon, that seems highly unlikely. While Basalt can form huge hexagonal columns, it would not do so on a stone by stone basis.. certainly you would never find just one rock that shape..
3) some artifacts show clear signs of NOT being rocks...

Examples




In the center you can see a curved "pipe" with branches in a "v" in the center; two square "u" shaped objects, and the blue "cross"




This one has a wavy edge and curls around on the right, with little dots in each scallop of the wavy edge. It looks like a piece of bent corregated metal more than a rock..



This one has two areas with thin straight bars that are inter connected and crossing. I have never seen a rock do that and I have seen a lot of rocks

Conclusion:

Until we find further evidence either way, this case is open and requires further analysis. Because of this, the images on THIS PAGE are a collection of all the anomalies we found so far. They are presented for study and no comments other than the labels will be added here.

We will leave it up to the reader to examine them for themselves and make up their own minds. We are also currently seeking the high resolution .tiff images to assist us in making a determination.

U.S. Admits "Salvage Operation" Underway in Antarctica

CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida (AMP) — The United States for the first time admitted it is engaged in a "salvage operation" in Antarctica and says that a recently discovered "anomaly" two miles beneath the ice is a NASA Mars module lost during an ill-fated training mission 31 years ago....

Observers in the international community were suspicious of the announcement, calling the "recovery effort " a cover story for something more sinister. "Why all the secrecy?" asked one French diplomat at the United Nations. "When the Liberty Bell 7 space capsule was discovered on the floor of the Atlantic Ocean, much hoopla was made. Now it sits in the Kansas Cosmosphere. Where is the publicity for this discovery?"....


Some intelligence analysts speculate that the lost Mars module was powered by a compact nuclear reactor plant. That would be in direct violation of the international Antarctic Treaty. "The irony," said one space observer, "is that in attempting to cover its past infringements, the U.S. does even greater violation to the treaty."....

To this day NASA has refused to release details on the module, Red Genie, or the names of its four occupants. But some old-timers from the Apollo space program recall Red Genie disappeared halfway through a 40-day training mission meant to simulate conditions on Mars after the ice beneath it mysteriously collapsed, revealing an ancient, scythe-like gorge almost one mile long and two miles deep. ...

When asked why a military rather than a civilian salvage crew was used, Flood said that NASA reserved the right to inspect the capsule for signs of what went wrong in 1969. Two cameras and a tape recorder were on board that could shed light on what happened in one of the more intriguing mysteries of American space flight....

The Mars shuttle, as originally formulated by rocket pioneer Wernher von Braun in 1953 and later revised by NASA planners in the late 1960s...

SOURCE

Originally posted by zorgon
Wow two people on the same day! My thanks for taking the time to read everything. Its refreshing to know that all of those here who have worked to present these "anomalies" have not done so in vain. Thanks Navieko and aZiXx

No no no buddy... THANK YOU! The work you have done is amazing. Anyone who doesnt read it all... it's exactly like only reading certain chapters in a book, and then criticizing the author for some point he made, when he could have discussed it more somewhere you didnt read and answered your question. Would that be a smart move? No... but many here still do the exact same thing. I saw many times where things were brought up over and over. And it's sad that most people will not read the whole thing....

Originally posted by zorgon
Thanks and welcome to our lunacy...

My kind of place...

Originally posted by zorgon
I came across a little tidbit today in a roundabout search and found it very intriguing and pertinent to or theory...

Wernher von Braun was in Antarctica in 1967. We have been studying the "Antarctic Connection" for some time and this was the first time I ran into this...

Originally posted by TheBorg

What picture?? Did you just do that to put us in suspense? If so, I'm gonna scream, hehe. /quote]
Ummmm the MIB's deleted it? Or I was too tired and missed pasting it? Nope gonna stick with the first one...

But now I have two pictures of that model Now I need to hunt down another source of that Antarctica recover story...

In response to your previous post, I've got to ask a question. I know you said that that "light" was on long enough for independent confirmation, but do we know if anyone else got any images of it? If so, this little bit of evidence could be significant to our cause. It might even change the tide into our favor, what with all of the evidence thus far in tow.

I will get more details on that... As I recall the independant observations were at least well documented by astronomers, and this TLP is actually on NASA's database...

TLP are on my list of "to do" Only problem is there is so much data to go through, especially NASA's own catalog. Aristarchus accounts for more than half the TLP's so I am working that angle...

I found an old document 1952 that records purple bluish glow that changes intensity to a peak of 19.0 time normal background in the K range and then drops back to a mere 4.2 times over a two month period...


It was this report that put Aristarchus on the "must observe" list on Apollo 11, the partial mission logs of what they saw being on my site..

For newbies {that anything like moonbies?:wow

MISSION LOGS

Intelligence and government officials faced a delicate moral quandary in 1945 - whether it was worth it to give American homes to men who had invented weapons to kill American soldiers, men who in some cases subscribed to beliefs that hundreds of thousands Americans had died to eradicate. In the end they decided it was, if these men could help the United States defeat the Soviets.

Remember, I could be a big disinformant liar making things up.