Lloyd The Taxicab Driver: The Mystery of the Undamaged Hood., page 1
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 11-9-2006 @ 01:32 PM by Jack Tripper
I haven't been here in a while so I figured I'd give ATS something to chew on for the 5 year anniversary.

Perhaps some members may remember this thread about Lloyd (read Lloyd's original account here):

9/11 Pentagon: The Mystery of the Moved Taxi

I can tell you that since that thread was created by the administrators at ATS, a significant amount of new information has been obtained. But the main point is that whether or not the cab was moved is quite irrelevant when demonstrating the impossibility of Lloyd's account in general.

For those that don't know; Lloyd's account is utterly critical to the official story of a 757 hitting the pentagon.

Lightpole number 1 allegedly went through his windshield.

Here is a picture of his taxi on 9/11 next to the lightpole:



Now the real question is how possible is it that a light pole of this size get's knocked down by a 757 going over 500 mph and comes crashing through the windshield but doesn't even scratch the hood?



Russell Pickering is the owner of www.pentagonresearch.com...

He is a premier pentagon researcher and currently supports the 757 impact hypothesis but believes it was remote guided as opposed to piloted by Hani Hanjour.

He had been debating Merc about Lloyd for weeks.

Russell had done a phone interview with Lloyd and had surmised that it was merely the top arm piece of the pole that had gone through his windshield which is why the hood remained undamaged. This is the piece Russell was talking about:



That would certainly make sense except that Lloyd is quite old and a bit senile so there were still questions about what piece he was talking about in the phone interview.





So Dylan Avery invited Russell Pickering and Merc (along with myself) to Washington DC on a little field research trip for Loose Change Final Cut.

We had interviews with many eyewitnesses and planned on surveying the topography of the area and many other things.

And since Russell already had Lloyd's phone number......we lined up an interview with him as well to clarify once and for all which piece of the pole really went through the windshield.

But first we paid a trip to the VDOT (virginia department of transportation) to inspect the poles.

They informed us that the orginal poles from 9/11 were unceremoniously sent out as scrap with their regular 60 day salvage pick up.

Here are pics of the VDOT cleaning up the poles almost 3 weeks later on 9/29.

(Why didn't the fbi collect these key pieces of evidence?)

So they were gracious enough at the VDOT to show us the same type of pole that allegedly hit Lloyd's taxi cab for us to inspect.



I lifted the base end up and I had to squat lift to do it. The pole is 250 lbs and naturally the base is the heaviest part. Russell and Merc both agreed that it was physically impossible for the long piece of the pole to be what pierced Lloyd's windshield.

So after inspecting the poles at the VDOT Lloyd agreed to have us over to his house for an interview.

He invited us in and introduced us to his wife.

First we opened up a laptop and showed Lloyd multiple pictures from 9/11 and had him identify which piece of the pole went through his windshield.

Time after time he pointed to the large piece that all of us knew was impossible.

Russell even drew a diagram of the cab and had Lloyd illustrate the pole.

He specifically drew the base of the long piece of the pole sticking out of the windshield into mid-air.

Lloyd claims that after the pole hit his car that was going about 40 mph he locked his brakes (but there are no visible skid marks) and that a stranger in a van that "didn't say a word" helped him lift the pole up out of his car but that he fell to the ground when doing so because he didn't know the top end of the pole that was in his car was bent. So all of this supposedly happened without even scratching the hood.

Lloyd is old, frail, and a bit senile. I can't imagine him lifting the pole at all even with the help of the mysteriously silent stranger.

Lloyd agreed to do an interview on camera for us so we decided to do it outside in front of his new cab.

Dylan and I preparing to interview Lloyd:


Lloyd showing us the signed torn in half dollar bill that he saved from 9/11.


Lloyd lit up for the camera......he gave us his account as usual but this time he did something different......he suggested that it made no sense to him that he couldn't see any large pieces of the plane!

The story just get's weirder after that.

Lloyd's wife busted out with some personal photos of the cab taken just after they got it back from impound the next day.

Look how pristine the hood is:



In Lloyd's account he has the sharp top part of the severed poll knocking the passenger seat down to allow it to go all the way to the back seat. However this personal photo of the interior shows the passenger seat unripped or pierced!



Seems odd when you consider the enourmous kinetic energy the poll would have absorbed after being hit by a 757.

But look closely at the pic.

Look what book Lloyd was reading on 9/11!

None other than David Icke's new book at the time about the Lizard shapeshifting NWO. Released in April of 2001!



We asked Lloyd if he reads David Icke and his response was simply "I read a little bit of everything".

Quite a strange coinicidence and rather odd coming from an uneducated cabdriver in his 70's.


reply posted on 11-9-2006 @ 02:09 PM by Slap Nuts
Nice piece of work! WOTs!

I do not believe a 757 can hit a light pole and survive.

Light pole severs flight 255 (DC-9) wing at take off speed.


www.lasvegassun.com...

...It clipped a light pole in the National Car Rental parking lot, 2,760 feet past the runway, shearing off 18 feet of the left wing, then brushed the roof of the Avis Rent A Car building. The engines stalled.


This was flight 255 out of Detroit in the 80's. It was only at takeoff speeds when it hit a SINGLE pole and sheared off the wing.



reply posted on 11-9-2006 @ 11:03 PM by In nothing we trust
Originally posted by Jack Tripper
Originally posted by In nothing we trust

What's this about?


Read Lloyd's original account here:

9/11 Pentagon: The Mystery of the Moved Taxi


Simultaneously, the plane struck a light pole and the pole came crashing down onto the front of Lloyd’s taxi cab, destroying the windshield in front of his eyes. Glass was everywhere as he tried to stop the car. Another car stopped and the driver helped move the heavy pole off Lloyd’s car. As they were moving the pole, they heard a big boom and turned to see an explosion. The light pole fell on Lloyd and he struggled to get up from underneath, wondering what had happened.

www.abovetopsecret.com...'


Gee, I guess lloyd is a fast mover. After all he was able to recover from the shock of having his windshield shatter in his face, slam on his breaks (He was driving on the highway I assume), get out of his car and begin to move the pole off of his car all before he heard the jet hit the building.



That half of his dollar bill must be a large monetary reward waiting for him in a numbered swiss bank account. And all he has to do is keep his mouth shut for a few years and stick to the official story.

[edit on 11-9-2006 by In nothing we trust]


reply posted on 12-9-2006 @ 05:34 AM by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Originally posted by Jack Tripper

Lloyd is the only human account directly linked to the light poles.


Not necessarily. Hundreds of unrelated witnesses on the ground near the area reported the plane clipping the lightposts.

The light poles are the only damage that would pretty much HAVE to be the result of a 757 if they weren't staged.


No they wouldnt. There was the generator damage and the airplane wreckage at the pentagon.

The David Icke book is merely a curiosity.


I suppose it could be seen as that.

The physical impossibility of his account is compelling evidence that the downed light poles were staged.


Not by a long shot. From one of your own links:

At the speed of 345 mph which was recorded by the recovered AA77 flight data recorder, the leading edge of the wing could slice through the approximately 5 inch diameter pole (at that height) with .188 of an inch thick aluminum walls like butter. This would cause the top half of the pole to pop up over the wing and essentially fall straight back down, which is effectively what we see with all the poles in the photos. The bottom half of the pole would have been driven forward with little resistance. If a VW Rabbit can break one at 20 mph 23 inches off the ground then it takes significantly less force with the leverage effect of being hit higher up. This may be why we have minimal wing debris on the ground.

This limited damage factor is why the FAA requires these type of poles in the "safety zones" around airports and helipads. They recognize that this type of pole minimizes damage to aircraft, "FAA regulation requires any structure located within 250 feet of runway centerline has to be frangible, which means the structure needs to break away when hit by an aircraft to minimize damages to the aircraft and its pilot." (Source)

One of the most commonly reported features in the eyewitness reports was the aircraft impacting light poles. In conjunction with the reported striking of the poles many eyewitnesses mentioned a change in the sound of the engines. Some described it as the engines being "revved up" or the aircraft going to "full-throttle".

The minimum wingspan required to create the pole damage was approximately 100 feet. The maximum wingspan before you would have had additional poles impacted is approximately 140 feet. The wingspan of a 757-200 is 124 feet 10 inches. This accounts for the minimum of 100 feet and allows for a 16 foot tolerance which is exactly what we see in the diagrams.

The first pole impact occurred at approximately 1000 feet prior to the Pentagon wall. 345 mph is 506 per second. That means it would have been roughly 2 seconds with the aircraft being driven by momentum between the first pole and the wall. There would not have been the force or the time for the pole damage to cause a deviation in the flight-path.

The following video exemplifies evidence for an aircraft hitting the Pentagon including the poles. I spoke with the creator of this and clarified that they built their model and let what happened happen. The right engine ingesting the lamp head on pole number 3 was not programmed into their scenario, it was predicted by the model. This would explain the change in the engine sound reported by witnesses and the anomalous vapor trail at ground level seen in the DoD videos.


www.pentagonresearch.com...

Sorry, but the probability of them staging a bunch of falling lightpoles in broad daylight in front of thousands of witnesses is even more unlikely.
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



9-11 lecture at Basel University, Switzerland.
  Posted 15 days ago with 14 member flags
9/11 Actors re-visited
  Posted 9 days ago with 13 member flags
Building Collapses in Rio
  Posted 16 days ago with 6 member flags
new film "Human the film (2012)" covers all the bases and more!
  Posted 10 days ago with 6 member flags
Remains of 9/11 victim identified
  Posted 1 days ago with 5 member flags
you must try this youre self ????
  Posted 15 days ago with 4 member flags