It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Naas said Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld all were in positions to play significant roles in Iran policy then, "but in those days, you have to view Kissinger as the main figure." Requests for comment from the offices of Cheney, Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld went unanswered.
"It is absolutely incredible that the very same players who made those statements then are making completely the opposite ones now," said Joseph Cirincione, a nonproliferation expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. "Do they remember that they said this? Because the Iranians sure remember that they said it," said Cirincione, who just returned from a nuclear conference in Tehran -- a rare trip for US citizens now.
Since 1968, the Tehran Nuclear Research Center [located in suburban Amirabad] has included a research reactor with a nominal capacity of 5 megawatts provided by the United States under IAEA safeguards. The reactor core was due to be upgraded and replaced with Argentine assistance in the late 1980s. Construction of an installation for producing radioisotopes is complete, and there are unconfirmed reports that this facility can produce plutonium from spent nuclear fuel. The Center also includes an installation for producing "yellow cake," which has not operated recently due to unsatisfactory technical condition. The Ebn-e Qasem laser technology research laboratory entered service in October 1992, although the laboratory has no lasers suitable for separating uranium isotopes.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
.............
War isnt always the answer.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
If Iran is such a threat to Israel, I dont understand why America should suffer.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Now, obviously anyone with some common sense can see that this thread is a red herring, again trying to blame the United States for something which is the fault of the present regime in Iran....
[edit on 11-9-2006 by Muaddib]
The war against this enemy is more than a military conflict," the president said. "It is the decisive ideological struggle of the 21st century and the calling of our generation.
He said Islamic radicals are trying to build an empire "where women are prisoners in their homes, men are beaten for missing prayer meetings and terrorists have a safe haven to plan and launch attacks on America and other civilized nations."
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Yes but IRAN hasnt the capability to hit the USA.
They arent a threat.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
They are a threat to Israel, and if nukes are develouped it will be Israel that is hit .
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
A war is the only way to finish a conflict, once war has started.
If someone in my backyard threatened me with a gun, id act.
If someone in my neighbours backyard threatend him with a gun, i wouldnt intervene unless the situation was dire.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
If someone threatend me with a gun from Mauritius, I wouldnt go running over there to disarm him.
Originally posted by the_sentinal
The war against this enemy is more than a military conflict," the president said. "It is the decisive ideological struggle of the 21st century and the calling of our generation.
He said Islamic radicals are trying to build an empire "where women are prisoners in their homes, men are beaten for missing prayer meetings and terrorists have a safe haven to plan and launch attacks on America and other civilized nations."
statements like these lead one to believe that were not far from a move by ethier side in this war on terror.
[edit on 12-9-2006 by the_sentinal]
Originally posted by the_sentinal
Not exactly a red herring when some of the same players have been shown to be involved back then, sure it was a diffrent regime but anyone with a little common sense could have seen that the potential for a radical leader coming into power was huge given their Islamic history. Ayatollah Ruhallah Khomeini was exiled from Iran in 1964 for instigating religious and political uprisings against the shah from 1964 to 1978
anyone with half a brain (not meaning you Muaddib) could see that the potential for a regime change was a real threat in the face of such unrest and political insurgencies that were trying to take place at the time. do I fault the U.S. for this meddling??? yes, we should have kept out of Iran.
Originally posted by the_sentinal
... they should have seen the possibilities of a radical leader taking over in the future and should have known it was bound to happen, just plain careless.
Originally posted by Muaddib
You can guess and you might be able to predict some of the changes, but mostly you would be "guessing"...
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Israel will not allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons. If that means a pre-emptive strike they will do it. its that simple folks.