It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

New bizarre 9/11 conspiracy theory - You won't believe it

page: 2
0
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 12:25 PM
link   
luckily, giuliani had foresight enough to build a fifteen million dollar emergency command bunker exactly where it was needed, ....at the WTC. no city is complete with out it's eye in the sky emergency command bunker.
and, knowing that bombs were placed in the basement in 1993, and that the the best place to avoid bombs is up in the sky, the 23rd floor was the obvious choice for the much needed command bunker.
i mean, who WOULDN'T think of putting a super high tech bomb shelter on the 23rd floor of a wtc skyscraper, one of the most likely targets in new york?
of course, it's unfortunate that this building later slid smoothly into the ground at freefall speed. who could have known THAT would happen?


[edit on 11-9-2006 by billybob]




posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 01:53 PM
link   
Actually, theres more evidence that Mothra and Godzilla attacked and destroyed the WTC than there is evidence to support the offical story.

And leave poor Dubya alone. How dare your criticize him for spending his morning with kind 6 year olds who were trying to teach him how to read? I think the threat of an illerterate prez har outways a couple rouge planes that the airforce cant catch.




posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 02:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Actually, theres more evidence that Mothra and Godzilla attacked and destroyed the WTC than there is evidence to support the offical story.


Could this be a picture of mothra?

Or is it just a picture of 'the great satan' taken at the bohemian grove?




Former United States President George Bush is seen en route to the Bohemian Grove on July 22, 1993. Bush belongs to the Grove's "Hill Billies" camp whose affiliates include quite a few others who, like Bush, attended Yale University. Bush flew in on Union Pacific Corporation's jet.



www.sonic.net...




[edit on 11-9-2006 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 04:12 PM
link   
Very funny! ha ha

Or how about this one.....

A depressed President of the U.S., suffering low poll numbers, decides to try to kill maybe 10,000 or more fellow Americans (and risk being caught) by ordering dozens (or more) of other unknown neo-con American co-conspirators to plan and execute a double-entendre attack on the World Trade Center by, first rigging it for explosive demolition and then arranging to have airliners strike the towers--either by remote control or by hiring suicide Arab terrorists who were willing to die to get an American politician re-elected. But wait! There are other delectable jewels to this alternative theory: First, the President also managed to disable or degrade the US command and control defense systems on the day of the attack (without witnesses coming forward). Second, neither the highly esteemed John ONeill or any of the other 1000s of WTC workers saw any strangers loading the WTC with explosives. Third, the remote controlled jets were allowed to take off despite flight attendent objections that the pilots had not yet reported for duty--either that, or the ex-CIA pilots flew them to an undisclosed location where they then executed all passengers and buried them in unmarked graves so they would not later come forward and tell us that it wasn't their jets that hit the WTC that day. Fourth, if bringing down the WTC towers wasn't enough, the President also arranged to have two other jets hijacked and to arrange to have the wife of his unhappily wed neo-con friend (the Attorney General) on one of the jets. Fifth, if the hijackrs were indeed hijackers (and you don't subscribe to the remote controlled jet theories) the President somehow managed to ensure that the hijackers were able to smuggle guns and explosives onto the flights because after all, no one believes an angry man with a boxcutter or knife could terrorize or kill a flight attendant or unsuspecting pilot prior to 911 at a time when knives and boxcutters were legal carry-ons.

I personally think the Lone Phone Call theory is the one that is more realistic, as I described in another thread in this subforum a few days ago.



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 04:46 PM
link   
Not that I'm backing the official story in its entirety, but during SO's podcast last night, he brought up a pretty good point.

We tend to get overly sarcastic in going after these conspiracy theories, to the point of turning parts of it into a joke. I've done this myself on a few occassions.

If we want people to truly think about the details that don't add up and quit being spoonfed by one administration or another, it would be prudent to set an example for how serious we take it. Nothing's funny about this.

Just my $.02.



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 04:49 PM
link   
Mod Edit: Off Topic Post Removed.

Mod Note: Terms & Conditions Of Use – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 11/9/2006 by Mirthful Me]



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 04:49 PM
link   
Mod Edit: Off Topic Post Removed.

Mod Note: Terms & Conditions Of Use – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 11/9/2006 by Mirthful Me]



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 05:05 PM
link   



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 05:07 PM
link   
w00t!

Update - according to CNN developing news it appears the grounds have shifted again! o_O


President Bush will tonight call the war on terror a fight "to maintain the way of life enjoyed by free nations," according to excerpts released ahead of his 9 p.m. ET address to the nation.


It continues to evolve...woe to he who bats an eye for he may miss the next

Terror in the Sky!

*we'll be back after this brief message from our sponsors!*

[edit on 9-11-2006 by Valhall]



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 05:09 PM
link   
What-the-kissing-blarney-stone is going on with Lumos?

Lumos - are you being rambunctious?



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 06:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by In nothing we trust


Could this be a picture of mothra?



Yeah, probably. Good point.




posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 06:12 PM
link   
To Tone:

The autopsies showed no middle easteners on board. How do you figure there were 19 hijackers??


I have heard repeatedly autopsy reports didnt have the goods.


That's one of those little obscure things people forget.



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 06:14 PM
link   
George W knew he would be a one term president if he didn't have an active conflict for him to focus the electorate's fear on. I don't believe any level of our military or intelligence services had an active had in the comission of the 9-11-01 attack. That said I believe that every Presidential Administration since 1980 have shown the grossest form of negligence to their duties to the American people by supporting despotic regimes in the Middle East in the name of economic stability. The current administration is the most corrupt administration since the Coolidge in the 1920's. They're grossly incompotent and unconcerned with the welfare of billions of people.
My own take is that the missing trilloins of dollars from the defense budget aren't really missing at all but have been funneled into the continuing development of black ops superweapons which are controlled by an elitist global shadow gov't. We've had on board nuclear reactors in aircraft in the 50's as well as electromagnetic propulsion systems in the 60's. Does anyone think that we ever stopped developing these systems because they were labeled impractical? This shadow gov't is responsible for many crimes against humanity. This current war on terrorism is a puppet show to keep the majority of people's attention diverted from the darker truth that that we've had solutions to poverty, hunger and the so called energy crisis for years. If there are no more poor and downtrodden to lord over, how are the elitist supposed to feel powerful if they've got no one to look down upon.



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 06:19 PM
link   
more to add to the popular conspiracy.....

on the day of the attack our wonderful government came to the conclusion the apparent attack must have been carried out by the evil muslim osama bin laden.
archive.salon.com...



In the noon hour on CNN, Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah -- a member of both the Senate Intelligence and Judiciary Committees -- said that he had just been "briefed by the highest levels of the FBI and of the intelligence community."

"They've come to the conclusion that this looks like the signature of Osama bin Laden, and that he may be the one behind this," Hatch said -- more than six hours before administration officials told reporters that they were "confident" bin Laden was probably behind the attacks.



considering our government was at the conclusion the attack was carried out by a member of the bin laden family, what would the common sense action be? how about getting these people, the bin ladens , out of the united states of america.

www.sauduction.com...



Washington had probable cause to hold in custody the bin Laden family members who were in the United States 9/11/01. We believe an interrogation of bin Laden family members would have resulted in the true depth of those implicated. Instead, bin Laden family members were escorted by the Department of State out of the country. Who gave this order? Who denied the intelligence community the ability to interrogate them?


this conspiracy is just to unbelievable for me.


[edit on 11-9-2006 by elitegamer23]



[edit on 11-9-2006 by elitegamer23]

[edit on 11-9-2006 by elitegamer23]

edited because im lame

[edit on 11-9-2006 by elitegamer23]



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 06:50 PM
link   
The patriot act was introduced as H.R.2975, 10/2/2001 by Rep Sensenbrenner, F. James, Jr. and was signed into law by President George W. Bush on October 26, 2001.

In as little as 6 weeks, after 9/11, the government drafted and passed into law the USA patriot act. The law activly encouraged the media to ask probing questions into 9/11. It made sure that the government could not violate any of the freedoms which were written into the constitution.

The patriot act did not allow the US government to tap american phone lines or investigate american citizens without a court order. Nor did the patriot act allow the government to enter the residence of american citizens without a court order. In addition there was not a secret prison system set up by the CIA in eastern europe and enemy combatants were not tortured or held without being charged with a crime.

en.wikipedia.org...

Anyone who took a stand against the USA patriot act was not labelled as a troublemaker by the US government. In fact critisism of the president and the government was encouraged.


[edit on 11-9-2006 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 07:07 PM
link   
I was watching a memorial today and the Joint Chiefs Of Staff Chairman said the following sentence:




The number of deaths in Iraq is reaching the number of those murdered in the Pentagon, New York at the World Trade Center, and the sky over Pennsylvania.



In the sky over Pennsylvania? But I thought the government said that the plane crashed because the terrorists took it over and crashed it, even though eyewitness reports state otherwise.


Then, Dick Cheney (a.k.a. "Darth Cheney") made sure to stress "in a field over Pennsylvania".



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 07:14 PM
link   
Are satire threads allowed? I thought ATS was more strict than this. =P

Anyway, funny. I was getting a bit sick and tired of 9/11 conspiracy theories.



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 07:15 PM
link   
And then there's the triple-fault incompetency of the intelligence agencies...(this is where Occam's Razor is not very nice to us debunkers)

NSA-flubbers

NSA wiretaps safe-house in Yemen where even Osama bin Laden is calling in. Gets full names of al Mihdhar and al Hazmi and learn they are planning a trip to Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia to attend a big jihad-fest where terrorist attacks will be planned. NSA tracks them there.

NSA-CIA-no-talkie-flubbers

CIA is monitoring the meeting of the jihadists in Malaysia and talks to NSA about it. CIA has al Mihdhar's full name, but doesn't know al Hazmi's last name. Even though NSA knows both full names, they don't pass the information on to the CIA.

NSA-CIA-joint-flubbers

NSA is monitoring Malaysia jihad-fest and are tracking al Mihdhar and al Hazmi. CIA is monitoring Malaysia jihad-fest and tracking al Mihdhar. Both track their respective targets to Bangkok, Thailand where they summarily lose any and all of what they were tailing.

CIA-flubber

CIA learns that al Mihdhar has flown into Los Angeles (actually al Hazmi flew in with him but see NSA-no-talkie-flubbers above for why CIA doesn't know this). CIA issues a cable across CIA and FBI that everybody needs to turn in every suspected terrorist they know is in-country to the "terror watch list"...but doesn't turn in al Mihdhar themselves!

CIA-FBI-no-talkie-flubbers

FBI agent learns of al Mihdhar being in-country and contacts CIA agent to find out if he needs to pass info on to FBI headquarters for dissemination. CIA agent tells him ABSOLUTELY NOT, don't tell anyone! Then CIA agent sends cable out to CIA saying that information has already been shared with FBI.

NSA-CIA-FBI-joint-double-flubber-cluster-f***

Since CIA didn't tell FBI about al Mihdhar, and NSA didn't tell CIA who still wouldn't have told FBI about al Hazmi, al Mihdhar and al Hazmi spend six months living in the house of an FBI informant and the FBI doesn't even know it....

pfffft.

9/11/01 - al Mihdhar and al Hazmi participate in conspiracy of originating post...Kill FBI agent John O'Neill - only question is - is O'Neill the FBI agent who found out about al Mihdhar and was told by the CIA agent not to share the information??? hmmm...don't know.

www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.cooperativeresearch.org.../11_hijackers=alhazmiAndAlmihdhar
www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 9-11-2006 by Valhall]



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 07:32 PM
link   
I'm very glad you've brought up the subject of the downing of United Flt 93. I remember hearing a copy of recording of the Cleveland ATC center speaking to a commercial airlines pilot who stated he saw a brilliant flash in the air. How can this be with no military aircraft in the area to shoot at it? My theory is that the airlines was brought down by a spaced based weapons platform. This is of course in violation of all sorts of weapons and space treaties but hell does anyone believe today that we(not just the US) haven't been putting weapons in space since Day One? So the powers that be concoct the story of the passengers trying to take back the plane and the hijackers dove the plane into the ground .



posted on Sep, 11 2006 @ 07:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by crgintx
I'm very glad you've brought up the subject of the downing of United Flt 93. I remember hearing a copy of recording of the Cleveland ATC center speaking to a commercial airlines pilot who stated he saw a brilliant flash in the air. How can this be with no military aircraft in the area to shoot at it? My theory is that the airlines was brought down by a spaced based weapons platform. This is of course in violation of all sorts of weapons and space treaties but hell does anyone believe today that we(not just the US) haven't been putting weapons in space since Day One? So the powers that be concoct the story of the passengers trying to take back the plane and the hijackers dove the plane into the ground .


Oh no, my friend. You've missed some data. The ever-present C130 (possible EC130-H???).

The following events and associated time-tags are taken straight from the official 911 Commission Report.

Both planes have hit the WTC towers...

9:25 - FAA Herndon Command Center orders a nationwide ground stop

Flight 77 is headed toward DC

9:33 Reagan airport is notified of incoming, high-speed, unidentified aircraft.

9:34 FAA Herndon informs FAA HQ Flight 93 has been hijacked.

9:34 an Air National Guard C130H takes off in the Washington DC area (from what specific location is unknown). This ANG plane is allowed to take-off 8 minutes after the FAA ground stop was called. And, yes, I understand that we are talking about FAA and military differences - I'm sure there's some extremely critical reason a cargo plane needed to take off allegedly to do nothing more than fly to Minnesota - in the middle of all hell breaking loose.

Reagan airport contacts the C130H and requests that he try to locate the unidentified aircraft, identify it, and follow if possible. The C130H immediately spots the plane and identifies it as a 757 and attempts to follow it.

9:36 - FAA Cleveland advises FAA Herndon it is tracking 93 and asks if a fighter intercept has been requested.

9:37 - Flight 77 impacts Pentagon

9:38 - C130H notifies Reagan "that aircraft crashed into the Pentagon sir"

The C130H apparently is allowed to continue on its all critical mission to Minnesota.

9:42 - FAA Herndon instructs all airborne aircraft to land at nearest airport

The C130H continues on.

9:49 - Commander of NORAD directs all air sovereignty aircraft to battle stations, fully armed

The C130H continues on.

10:03



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join