It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Dark Matter's Rival: Ether Theory
Challenges "Invisible Mass"
Elizabeth Svoboda
for National Geographic News
September 8, 2006
news.nationalgeographic.com...
Late last month scientists working at NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory announced that they had found proof of dark matter, the theoretical substance believed to make up more than a quarter of the universe.
But Glenn Starkman, a cosmologist at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, Ohio, is hitting back with a blast from the past.
He argues that dark matter might not exist and that the long-discredited substance known as ether is actually what influences gravity in the cosmos.
Dark matter is the prevailing scientific explanation for a puzzling phenomenon: Galaxies behave as if they contain much more mass than is visible to astronomers.
According to theory, dark matter is the invisible mass that accounts for this behavior, and the undetectable substance makes up five times more of the universe than the matter we can see.
Starkman's controversial counterproposal is that the presence of ether in the universe better explains the galaxies' behavior.
His theories were recently reported in the August 26 issue of New Scientist magazine.
"Galaxies spin faster than they should, given the amount of matter we see in them. The possibility we've gone with for a long time is that there's some unaccounted-for mass generating that extra gravity," Starkman said.
"But the other possibility is that the amount of mass we see generates more gravity than we thought. That's where ether comes in."
In the DESY experiment, the laser beam would be sent through a vacuum in the presence of a magnetic field and then into a wall. The idea is that a fraction of the laser photons will transform into the new particles, which then pass through the wall because they interact so weakly with other matter. Another magnetic field located on the other side of the wall will then transform some of these new particles back into photons – apparently regenerating photons out of nothing (arXiv.org/abs/hep-ex/0606058). Ringwald and colleagues plan to run an initial experiment towards the end of 2006, and then, if they do discover axions, carry out a second experiment to investigate the detailed properties of the particle in autumn 2007.
Originally posted by sardion2000
One big problem of the ether theory will always stand that cannot be reconciled with what we know about Relativity. No matter how fast you are traveling, light will always be the same speed. In Ether theory, if you were travelling towards a NE Vector at 25 miles/hour, and shot a beam of light SW, the speed of light would be reduced by the speed you were travelling NE. This has not been observered, ever, no matter how many times we test it.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Here is a thread I posted about an experiment where scientists are trying to "create" dark matter particles. Here is the experiment they are conducting..
Originally posted by sardion2000
This is happening all the time, no biggie. Everyone, even the lay-people, know that General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics don't mix. They work for lots of different predictions so we know that a good portion of those theories are correct. I find the current climate to be exciting actually. It feels like 1904 all over again
Originally posted by sardion2000
I don't think there is any reason to be skeptical of Relativity, it just works for so many things and applications, just like Newton who invariably got quite a bit wrong(like the instantanoius transfer of gravity rather then the speed of light in Relativity(we are testing that right now btw with space probes)).
What we do need to be skeptical about is any attempt to unify the two disparate theories.
Einstein wasn't alone in being stumped by the problem of Quantum Gravity and we have been searching for almost a Century for the key nugget of an idea that will provide us the ultimate theory of life, the universe, and everything... there are many proposals, but the top three seem to boil down to this.
INTRODUCTION TO LOOP QUANTUM GRAVITY, everything you ever wanted to know...
String Theory(QuickTime HI-RESOLUTION)
String Theory(RealAudio/QuickTime LOW-RESOLUTION)
Top-Down Approach
Random Theories/Weird Stuff
The "Third Road"
Starkman's conception of ether, however, is very different from the outmoded 19th-century one—he thinks that ether affects the pull of gravity, not the movement of light waves.
"With traditional gravitational models, you have a rubber sheet that curves wherever there's a large mass on it," he said.
In Starkman's theory of how ether works, "when ether is around, the rubber sheet gets softer. So when you put a large mass on the sheet, the effect of the mass goes out further."
news.nationalgeographic.com
Originally posted by sardion2000
All we need to do is stumble upon a set of mathematical equations that explains everything that we see with no infinities or paradoxes cropping up when testing the theory. We will get it eventually and when we do, the next phase begins and that is to apply that theory to everything we come across in the universe. If we find discrepancies then we modify the theory until the point where it becomes clear that a new one is needed or it becomes for all intents and purposes "perfected." Who knows whether this unified theory will be valid for what goes on outside of the universe, thats a whole nuther realm alltogether, and when people talk about a grand unified field theory, they're talking about the one that applies to this universe and this universe only. It could give hints as to the larger picture, but without actually being able to go there, it's all speculation.
Originally posted by SpeakerofTruth
So, I am assuming you too believe in the "many unverse" theory of Heisenberg...I think that is why our universe acts as if it is attached to something outside of itself. I believe it may very well have "erupted" from a pre-existing universe....
Originally posted by sardion2000
In the Top-Down model, Hawking proposes that all possible realities exist at the same spacetime, reality that we experience emerges from a cosmic averaging over the various realities. (All realities except ours are virtual(within this Brane that is))
Originally posted by sardion2000
I don't think you totally understand what Hawking said. We would not be able to percieve these virtual realities because they don't exist in the physical sense of the term. They are only possibilities and it's the mixing and mashing of all the possiblities that creates the reality we percieve. I personally am quite skeptical as I'm not too sure how one would test the model(I'll have to re-read the article too so I'll come back later an expand on what I'm saying)
[edit on 17-9-2006 by sardion2000]