It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The notorious Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad is at the centre of fresh abuse allegations just a week after it was handed over to Iraqi authorities, with claims that inmates are being tortured by their new captors.
Originally posted by rich23
So the torture when the US was in charge wasn't real? No-one died there while being tortured? Wasn't there an Iraqi general who died under torture in Iraq?
The US has been sponsors and teachers of torture for around 50 years, and anyone who's heard of the School of the Americas knows as much. Or Google the name Dan Mitrione and see what comes up.
"Real torture", eh? Nice way to try to spin it.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
No. The article states that it was preferable to the current torture being instituted by the current jailers.
The US wasn't the only country to sponsor torture or engage in it either. Just about every country on the planet has done it.
The School of the Americas was pretty damn evil. But its no different from any other covert state sponsored torture.
And remember, torture is not legal in the US or by US laws, hence why it has been covert and black ops. To hide it.
The things done by US soldiers at Abu Ghraib were disgusting and terrible, and there have been prosecutions, although mostly directed at the lower ranks.
The point of this article is to show that the Iraqis are no more humane or decent than the occupiers.
Originally posted by Kamran
So why is America acting like the beacon of humanity and democracy? Your statement just doesn't cut it.
Sure, no different, then why is America claiming righteousness? Freedom, Equality, Rights, Democracy... Seriously...
Yes, the things done were disgusting. But you know whats more disgusting? The non-inclusion of senior military personnel in the punishments and justice meted out to the lower ranks
Also, see how the occupation fails? Where is the freedom? Where is the justice? Where is security?
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
We are? thats news to me. it seems the only people who believe or say this are people who know nothing of the US except what they see on TV.
America is imperfect like any other country, and Americans know it.
The only ones claiming this are the Bush administration. Again, you know nothing of America except what you see on TV. I have yet to see any administration that accurately reflects the attitudes of the American public, this one included. Most people believe we are in Iraq for defensive purposes.
Of course it was. Very disgusting. And it still happens. Higher ranking officers still get off scot free while the lower ranks fry.
There will never be any of the above. Why? because the iraqis do not want it for themselves.
One of my major oppositions to this war. You cant bring democracy to people, nor security and freedom, to people who have no desire or concept for it.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Originally posted by rich23
So the torture when the US was in charge wasn't real?
No. The article states that it was preferable to the current torture being instituted by the current jailers.
And remember, torture is not legal in the US or by US laws, hence why it has been covert and black ops. To hide it.
The point of this article is to show that the Iraqis are no more humane or decent than the occupiers.
Originally posted by rich23
It's been posted under a title that seeks to minimise or deny US involvement in torture;
and the Iraqi security forces are being trained by the US, are they not?
Having taken control of the country,
the US is morally and legally responsible for the outcome
and I would argue that what it demonstrates is not Iraqi savagery, but the wrong example being set and the wrong people left in charge.
Originally posted by rich23
So the torture when the US was in charge wasn't real? No-one died there while being tortured? Wasn't there an Iraqi general who died under torture in Iraq?
The US has been sponsors and teachers of torture for around 50 years, and anyone who's heard of the School of the Americas knows as much. Or Google the name Dan Mitrione and see what comes up.
"Real torture", eh? Nice way to try to spin it.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
Training yes. However, training does not involve long standing cultural attitudes towards brutality. Try as you like, you cannot blame the US for everything in Iraq. Iraq was a mess before Bush even started his wet dreaming over taking the place.
The only person who ever had real control over the country is saddam And look what he had to do to obtain control. Yes and no. Again, there are problems that were festering in that area LONG before the US even existed. Legally? Thats a joke. You still believe in the myth called "international law"? I thought that fairy tale died out with WW2.
Doubly wrong.
Savagry and brutality were facts of life before the US came to the middle east, before the US existed. The Iraqis are following no example but their own. We see that during saddams reign, brutality was used to keep the population from killing each other. Without it, the Iraqis pretty much ignore whoever thinks they are in charge, and go back to the millenea old hatred, Shia vs Sunni, Arab vs. Kurd, ect.
It wouldnt matter if hippies took over the country. The fact is, the mentality in the middle east is VASTLY different from western Europe or North America. In otherwards, they do not want democratic and humanitarian government.
Their right, their choice. The only thing we agree on here is that the US should have never gone there. I believe it was a waste of time from the get go, and done mainly for a handful of rich people and their oil.
But just because i think the war was wrong does not mean I think the Iraq's are innocent victims either.
Originally posted by Kamran
And that justifies what? I wonder why the US went in? People keep saying that you cannot blame the US because those things existed before the US then explain to me the purpose of this futile exercise? Stop saying that because that was the reason the US entered Iraq - Regime change for the better.
And thats precisely the problem with the world. No one wants to accept International Law. But that is the one thing that can provide justice and an end to all problems. Only if the US stopped being so unilateral. Everyone knows its the sole superpower and people look up to it. Now if the American governments, rather than strengthening their image, choose to blindly follow their own policies what message goes out to the rest of the world.
Yes, the Americans are morally and legally obliged to protect Iraq's assets, not just oil.
Sunnis and Shias even intermarried and lived together. Iraq has never fought religious wars, only nationalistic wars for independence and such like.
Now since America has gone their and managed to screw it up even worse than Saddam, they have the duty to sort it out or get the hell outta there.
I wonder in whose interests the instability lies...