posted on Sep, 9 2006 @ 01:26 AM
There's a particular line here in this speach i want to make reference to.
"prewar assessments of Iraq "were a tragic intelligence failure."
How exactly do you make intellegence about Iraqs WMD, and Alqaeda relationship when there is absoltuley NO EVIDENCE suggesting such.
For there to be an intellegence FAILURE... there has to be INTELLEGENCE.
What did the US Administartion have in there posession, either on paper, or as hard proof that Saddam had such a stratgeic involvement with Alqaeda,
911 and was stockpiling mass amounts of WMD's.
What a complete farse.
What did the Australian Prime Minister have, as intellegence to BACK THIS WAR?
What convinced him sooo surely to follow the US into the war against saddams wmds?
How could he have evidence to follow, when there's no evidence at all.
And the only reason countries followed the US, were for political, economic or relationship gains.
And look where it has gotten the civilised world.