It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by centurion1211
Before the left gets their panties too much in a wad over this, I need to point out that their attempt to influence the 2004 elections through the Michael Moore/George Soros film really didn't work - since Bush still won.
So, why all the worries that this new ABC News "docudrama" might actually affect the 2006 elections?
Unless, maybe, they are worried because this time the film actually contains some truth?
Originally posted by seattlelaw
Truth? Hmmm, yes it MIGHT actually contain SOME truth. Certainly it can't contain much truth because it's a DRAMA with ACTORS, right? That's because TRUTH isn't what your fearless leader is interested in. Hiding the ball is his game, always has been.
The difference is that Moore used REAL video clips to support his thesis. See, that was really your fearless leader in "Fahrenheit 911" talking to his elitist supporters and it was really Condi and Dickie and Rummy telling us about the mushroom clouds we'd get if we didn't spend billions on Iraq.
My point being your boys simply don't want the truth to be told or discussed because it shows them for the FOOLS and LIARS they truly are. So by all means, make a FAKE DRAMA about what really happened.
As Nicholson said in "A Few Good Men",
"YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"
Originally posted by grover
Personally I really don't give a damned if its accurate or not... its propaganda, bloody feel good propaganda and personally I think its damned shameless to do any sort of for profit movie about 9/11...its capitalizing on a national tragedy, and if it isn't doing that its soft peddling a bad memory for political gain...either way it is obscene and immoral.
Originally posted by grover
And it is a fact that Bush ran and hid from Florida, to Louisiana to kansas before returning late in the day to Washington and didn't strike any macho cowboy pose until he was sure his ass was safe.
Originally posted by jsobecky
I don't have time to respond to your entire post; I will do so later. I just wanted to correct you on a major inaccuracy in your post:
We don't import oil from Iran.
RUSSIA 216 255 92 116 253
UNITED KINGDOM 185 174 132 269 227
Originally posted by centurion1211
Originally posted by La Balance
Now I'm anxious to see it. MY gut feel is that, the past has to do with it, but so does the present.
Another one like dgtempe that likes to think (or is it not even thinking, but feeling?) with their gut. Based on dg's signature quote, the best I can give you all for your "gut thinking" is the "10% that thinks they think".
Sorry, but that drops you to the lower 85% on dg's 'thinking scale'.
Still wonder how anyone could be so blind in their hatred of Bush as to not see that the terror attacks of the 80's and 90's (when Bush wasn't yet in office, but Clinton was) are what led up to 9/11. That's what the ABC News show is all about.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Four pages! Four pages of bickering and no one has even seen this yet!
Originally posted by jsobecky
Too bad Bush wasn't the Executive Producer of the film, because then your statement might have some relevance.
Tell me, when did you have the opportunity to view the entire docudrama? For your statement to be true, you must have seen it.
And you have absolutely no right to tell people what to think, believe, or watch on TV. None! Why are you so afraid of people seeing this film?
seattlelawAs Nicholson said in "A Few Good Men",
"YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!"
jsobecky
And you want to censor what people can watch.
And remember what happened to Colonel Nathan Jessup at the end of the movie...
Originally posted by marg6043
Now focusing in paying the blame game of who was at fault for 9/11.
Sorry but the president in power was Mr. Bush when 9/11 his administration is the solely party to blame for that tragic event.