Originally posted by bsl4doc
The "evolutionary sense" is that too many neural cells will quickly lead to empty synapses. This is the cause of nearly all chemical imbalance
issues. ..
The capability of cell division per se does not mean uncontrolled growth (= tumor), does it?. new neural tissue would have to be re-wired from the
get-go, that's true, but it still beats a scar or missing tissue by a wide margin.
the 'cost' of having the capability (if such a cost even exists) has already been paid, yet the mechanism remains unused.
the real question at
this point would be why and how it was evolutionarily developed in the first place, without feedback according to functionality and therefore
selective value.
to illustrate my final point about compensation gradual brain damage and its minimal effect (compared to the same damage inflicted traumatically), i
suggest
www.enidreed.com..." target="_blank" class="postlink">this link which leads me to conclude that gradual
damage could easily be compensated without side effects IF there was a way to activate it in vivo.
another interesting fact about regeneration in children:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
dormant regenerative capabilities should raise a few eyebrows, imho, anyone can come up with superficially plausible explanations, but how many of
these claims have ever been scientifically scrutinized ?