It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Uncle Joe
The Vatican has announced that it is excommunicating all those involved with Columbia's first legal abortion.
Despite the fact that the abortion was carried out on an 11 year old girl who was raped.
The Cardinal involved then went on to discribe those involved with the operation as 'Evildoers' whilst not commenting on the rapist.
Full artice Here
Words really fail me. God alone knows what church thinks the rape of an 11 year old is more acceptable than allowing her to live as normal a life as possible.
Originally posted by SkyWay
...moral duty to oppose abortion, even when it involves an assault on an innocent girl because it becomes a choice between the worst of two evils.
The murder of an unborn baby is a much worse evil than the rape of an 11 year old child. Both are terrible evils, but the rape of a young girl will not be undone or made any less tragic by killing the innocent child in the womb. In fact, it only makes the tragedy worse because then a child has been killed in addition to the one that was raped.
The president of Colombia's ecclesiastic tribunal, Monsignor Libardo Ramírez, said according to canonical law excommunication was applied to anyone who participated in the "murder of a child in the womb".
But he added that it would be up to Cardinal Rubiano Sáenz, as the leading figure of the Roman Catholic church in Colombia, to decide whether to formally apply the sanctions and to whom.
Originally posted by northwolf
There are severe heath risks involved as well as there is a high possibility that both childrens (the 11 years old and her child) life would be ruined?
It's just sick to force an 11 years old girl to be a mother, just because some twat 3000 years ago wrote something...
Originally posted by shearder
Another thing, these priests that abuse kids are NOT only from Africa as it may appear in the message above. I fear that this sort of assumption or mentality is typical of the education, or lack thereof, received throughout the world and people walking around with blinkers on. People – this # is going on in YOUR neighbour hoods NOT JUST AFRICA.
Originally posted by shearder
Man, I was starting to feel lonely on this thread - like the only spec of human intelligence until now. Thanks Skyway for "showing up".
[edit on 31/8/2006 by shearder]
Originally posted by northwolf
SkyWay
So you think it's right for the church to demand an 11 years old girl give birth when she's only and child herself?
There are severe heath risks involved as well as there is a high possibility that both childrens (the 11 years old and her child) life would be ruined?
It's just sick to force an 11 years old girl to be a mother, just because some twat 3000 years ago wrote something...
Originally posted by SkyWay
The abortionist is biggest health risk is to the unborn child AND to the young mother! To the child the threat is physical...to the girl it is spiritual because it gives her the evil impression that termination of life is acceptable.
Originally posted by Uncle Joe
Spot on Darkmind.
An 11 year olds body is not fully developed, could the child even carry the child to term? (reread that sentance, it demonstrates how disgusting this is) Is it fair to risk her life for an abstract ideal?
Its is quite possible that both mother and child would die. Is an 11 girl worth less than an embryo that shes had forced upon her?
The very idea that people defend this sickens me.