It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A majority -- 55 percent -- said they are more likely to back a challenger in races on this year's ballot. Such anti-incumbent sentiment is higher than the 48 percent recorded as "pro-challenger" in a similar survey in 1994, when the GOP took control of both houses of Congress.
Nonetheless, 48 percent said that, if most of the present members of Congress were replaced with new members, there would be no difference. By contrast, 42 percent said such a scenario would change Congress for the better, and 7 percent said it would change Congress for the worse.
Originally posted by xpert11
It seems if the Dems are unable to sell themselvs as an alternative and yet people may vote for them because they dont like what the Republicans have been doing in office.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
The more likely scenario is just Republicans stay home while Democrats, driven by Bush hatred, go to the polls en masse.
Originally posted by EastCoastKid
Originally posted by djohnsto77
Finally some good news! I think people are starting to realize what would happen if the Dems took over the Congress.
[edit on 8/30/2006 by djohnsto77]
What? Like investigations into the myriad wrongdoings of this administration and its congressional allies?
That would be a good thing for this ailing Republic, my friend.
These people in charge today will bring nothing but ruin upon us.
Its time to reign them in and hold them to account.
If the Democrats retake one or both chambers of congress, the BushCons had better lawyer up fast.
Originally posted by Ox
xpert11... Why does it have to be a Democrat? is it impossible for people to vote Independant? They're people too.. Usually not millionaires... Just.. People. trying to do something to help or change something..
Originally posted by djohnsto77
The more likely scenario is just Republicans stay home while Democrats, driven by Bush hatred, go to the polls en mases.
Republicans contend they can win the national security argument if they can link the two conflicts and emphasize national security, which historically has been the party's strength.
Democrats contend they can win control of Congress if voters view Iraq — and the problems there — on its own.
Despite such dismal sentiments, Americans are conflicted about whether to fire incumbents this fall. Three-in-five likely voters said most members of Congress deserve to be voted out of office but about the same also said their own representative should be re-elected.
In the 2002 and 2004 elections, Republicans successfully painted their rivals as weak on national security and they are using the same strategy this year. Democrats have aggressively tried to rebut the attacks as they push to gain 15 House seats and six Senate seats to take control.
WASHINGTON - President Bush and Republicans have gained some ground in their bid to hold onto Congress as a sustained GOP effort to portray Democrats and
Iraq war critics as appeasing terrorists has swayed voters
It's under the theory that if you don't talk about it it will go away.
Originally posted by djohnsto77
It looks like chances of us keeping the Congress look much better in the latest Gallup Poll. I wonder why more people aren't talking about this?