 |
|
Topic started on 3-11-2003 @ 12:38 PM by ultra_phoenix
|
Dinosaurs : Science Or Science Fiction ( there is matter for a long debate. ). A very good question, especially when you read this :
Link
The Dinosaurs Conspiracy is now running.
P.S : I didn't read everything, but I do my best.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 12:28 PM by Ozzie
|
makes for an interesting read, although it is still the creationists v the Darwinists. Instead of trying to prove their theory correct,because to them
its already proved, they try and discredit the others. Yes there has been a lot of hoaxes and scams and plain old incompetence regarding dinosaur
fossils, but for the most part they are there, just waiting to be correctly sorted and identified. as of yet most of it is still guesswork. personally
for me neither side has an entirely convincing or at least plausible theory. so until they do we shall never know
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 12:34 PM by heelstone
|
Ancient people didn't know DNA was in every living being either, but we found it much, much later. Our ancestors not knowing something does not mean
that something never existed. The arguments presented there are very weak.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 12:44 PM by greenkoolaid
|
Just people covering their ears and sticking their heads in the ground.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 12:47 PM by Seapeople
|
Wow,
Why cant people just accept the reality that things are what you see. Just because the dinosaurs dont agree with creationalism, or the bible for that
matter. They must be wrong. The bible is not a history book. Maybe it can be taken as a moral guide of sorts. The fact is things such as the
dinosaurs were not mentioned in the bible because people didnt know about them. They were not mentioned in other religious texts regarding
creationalism because they had never seen such things. Like said above, just because ancient civilizations did not know of them, does not mean they
didnt exist. Religious people and catholics. There is still room for your god to exist even with evolution and darwinism. We know that evolution
occurs. We know that creationalism is false. But that still doesnt explain everything. There is still enough left unknown.
Once again,
WOW
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 12:48 PM by Zzub
|
Some people will not admit the truth when they see it and will make up all sorts of theories to justify thier (incorrect) view.
Funny how the religious lot have to jump through hoops to make thier views fit in with all the evidence.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 01:27 PM by nathraq
|
The dinosaur industry needs to be investigated and questions need to be asked. I personally do not have any reasons to believe dinosaurs ever existed
and I believe they may be a fabrication of nineteenth and twentieth century people possibly under Satanic control pursuing an evolutionary and
anti-Bible and anti-Christian agenda

Found this paragraph on the link, hehe.
Of Course, it was Satan!!! Anything not in the bible, or any idea that disproves Christianity, is a product of Satan.
Easy to blame the guy who never had a chance to argue his point of view, hehe.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 06:19 PM by Satyr
|
Yes. Dinosaurs were created in Satans image, I'm sure.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 08:44 PM by darkspace
|
yeah, dinosaurs were created by lucifer before god banned him to hell. them god got rid of the dinosaurs and created man
nah! i believe we were created of intelligent design by aliens
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 19-11-2003 @ 08:53 PM by parrhesia
|
That's definitly an interesting read.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2003 @ 09:00 AM by Byrd
|
Religious fundamentalists will often have a field day with the truth. Remember the story about Muslim fundamentalist teachers teaching the boys that
dinosaurs were created by the Jews to eat Arabs.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2003 @ 09:12 AM by xenongod
|
Noah said to the Brontosaurus...comical...ain't it?..but probably true.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2003 @ 09:14 AM by Scarface
|
Lol i find that so funny, the lengths some extremists will go just to prove their point. It's very pathetic
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2003 @ 09:21 AM by jezebel
|
The idiots that wrote this were smoking their Bible rather than reading it!! Dinosaurs do not contradict the Bible, they are in it! So are dragons
in the water (Lochness type dinosaurs in my opinion). These people are so busy coming up with fairytales to mislead their followers and whoever else
they can convince that they have completely ignored their own book.
Job 40:15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.
Job 40:16 Lo now, his strength [is] in his loins, and his force [is] in the navel of his belly.
Job 40:17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.
Job 40:18 His bones [are as] strong pieces of brass; his bones [are] like bars of iron.
Job 40:19 He [is] the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach [unto him].
Job 40:20 Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play.
Job 40:21 He lieth under the shady trees, in the covert of the reed, and fens.
Job 40:22 The shady trees cover him [with] their shadow; the willows of the brook compass him about.
Job 40:23 Behold, he drinketh up a river, [and] hasteth not: he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth.
Job 40:24 He taketh it with his eyes: [his] nose pierceth through snares.
Just because it doesn't call it a "dinosaur" doesn't mean it isn't describing one.
Sorry, I didn't mean to quote Byrd on this. I hit quote instead of reply at the bottom of the page. Don't think I was calling you an idiot,
Byrd.
[Edited on 21-11-2003 by jezebel]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2003 @ 09:31 AM by jozuph
|
Originally posted by jezebel
Originally posted by Byrd
Religious fundamentalists will often have a field day with the truth. Remember the story about Muslim fundamentalist teachers teaching the boys that
dinosaurs were created by the Jews to eat Arabs. 
The idiots that wrote this were smoking their Bible rather than reading it!! Dinosaurs do not contradict the Bible, they are in it! So are dragons
in the water (Lochness type dinosaurs in my opinion). These people are so busy coming up with fairytales to mislead their followers and whoever else
they can convince that they have completely ignored their own book.
Job 40:15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.
Job 40:16 Lo now, his strength [is] in his loins, and his force [is] in the navel of his belly.
Job 40:17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.
Job 40:18 His bones [are as] strong pieces of brass; his bones [are] like bars of iron.
Job 40:19 He [is] the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach [unto him].
Job 40:20 Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play.
Job 40:21 He lieth under the shady trees, in the covert of the reed, and fens.
Job 40:22 The shady trees cover him [with] their shadow; the willows of the brook compass him about.
Job 40:23 Behold, he drinketh up a river, [and] hasteth not: he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth.
Job 40:24 He taketh it with his eyes: [his] nose pierceth through snares.
Just because it doesn't call it a "dinosaur" doesn't mean it isn't describing one. 
def science..........
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2003 @ 09:59 AM by xenongod
|
Originally posted by jezebel
The idiots that wrote this were smoking their Bible rather than reading it!! Dinosaurs do not contradict the Bible, they are in it! So are dragons
in the water (Lochness type dinosaurs in my opinion). These people are so busy coming up with fairytales to mislead their followers and whoever else
they can convince that they have completely ignored their own book.
Job 40:15 Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox.
Job 40:16 Lo now, his strength [is] in his loins, and his force [is] in the navel of his belly.
Job 40:17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together.
Job 40:18 His bones [are as] strong pieces of brass; his bones [are] like bars of iron.
Job 40:19 He [is] the chief of the ways of God: he that made him can make his sword to approach [unto him].
Job 40:20 Surely the mountains bring him forth food, where all the beasts of the field play.
Job 40:21 He lieth under the shady trees, in the covert of the reed, and fens.
Job 40:22 The shady trees cover him [with] their shadow; the willows of the brook compass him about.
Job 40:23 Behold, he drinketh up a river, [and] hasteth not: he trusteth that he can draw up Jordan into his mouth.
Job 40:24 He taketh it with his eyes: [his] nose pierceth through snares.
Just because it doesn't call it a "dinosaur" doesn't mean it isn't describing one.
Sorry, I didn't mean to quote Byrd on this. I hit quote instead of reply at the bottom of the page. Don't think I was calling you an idiot,
Byrd.
[Edited on 21-11-2003 by jezebel] 
So true...so true...more evidence everyday is being upturned from the earth that points to the Bible and ancient writings...and that Dinosaurs were
probably on the earth in Noah times. And that..is how the world turns...hehe.
[Edited on 21-11-2003 by xenongod]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2003 @ 10:03 AM by Zzub
|
Hmm.
But dinosaurs are older than the earth is, according to the bible. So does this mean that you are now going to have to tell us that carbon dating or
whatever method dinosaurs are aged by is wrong?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2003 @ 10:06 AM by jozuph
|
ow iam so tyred, seriuosly plz stop those stupid quotez..
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2003 @ 10:09 AM by xenongod
|
Radio carbon dating is based upon the scientific method of dating material TODAY with the carbon 14 molecule in our atmosphere assuming that the
atmosphere has never changed..WRONG. I can't believe they even rely upon a testing method that ASSUMES anything. The atmosphere used to be
different before the Great Flood...carbon 12 was more prominent from what I learned. Therefore....if you "scientifically" dated something today
with the same atmosphere that existed back then...everything would be A LOT younger than it shows by today's method.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 21-11-2003 @ 10:11 AM by MrRadicalEd
|
Well thats interesting you say that Zzub, because carbon dating does have its' flaws. Even gas chromatography/mass spectrometers have their flaws as
well, but to pit science with the writen words from the bible is.. a whole new can of beans
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |