Bigfoot Pics !

Hey guys I ran accross some Bigfoot pics. Pretty nteresting:

Bigfoot pics!

Pics look cool, clearest pics of supposed evidence.

Alittler hard to take as 100% proof but you never know. I'm not a photograph expert, or an expert on what these thngs look like up close.

[edit on 29-8-2006 by niato007]

sorry but im gonna break out the old 'fake' stamp. notice how not only does it scream photoshop, the leaves and branches are in different places on the zoomed in images. this is all IMO of course

Thanks DarkDude, after giving it a 2nd and third look, it does get harder to beleive the authenticity of the pics.

Thanks for you insight.

just throwing my two cents out there. heh i just noticed that based on stuff around it, it looks like the "creature" would only be about 3 or 4 feet tall. doesnt match the supposed story that goes with the pics, it does make the story kinda funny though

Thanks for your BF link.

But it looks too short to be a BF, I disagree about the leaves/branches having different positions on the zoom, looks ok to me in that respect. It looks like a simple gorilla suit hired from any decent pantomime hirers, like the ones in the pink panther film.

How come only one photo? And the terrain doesn't look like it is very rocky to be throwing rocks. Hoax IMO

The zoom is from a different photo.
The leaves are different and the zoom is a clearer pic than the far away one. thT doesn't happen when you zoom in..

We've already been over this one about a month ago. These people have multiple videos and they are hoaxes.

There are two photos, the first is zoomed out, with a blurred blow up as you would expect.

The second is a zoomed in photo (using the zoom lens) the gorilla has moved slightly from the first photo. The 2nd "blow up" is not a blow up at all, it is just a cropped image from the second photo.

Thats a pretty sweet operation they got goin' on there , although they definitely need to find someone taller to wear the gorrilla suit .

Things like this only go to backup the claim that the Patterson-Gimlin film taken on October 20, 1967 just may have been real, IMO.

Still to this day, fools like these guys cant even come close to that video. Day by day, new video by new video, new pics after new pics, I find Pattersons video more believable.

These pics, on the other hand, look fake. IMO, its a monkey suit with a dude in it. They dont even have it moving like Patterson captured.

[edit on 29-8-2006 by JbT]

I still don't get what is so important about discovering big foot.

Here's a nice artwork resembling the patterson pic of the bigfoot seen in
1967:BigFoot artwork pic

Here's a nice artwork resembling the patterson pic of the bigfoot seen in

Nice pic

But about the BF photo's, they are fake, I think we already had these on ATS not too long ago...

Originally posted by halfmask
I still don't get what is so important about discovering big foot.

Call it an obsession, but its what we Cryptos try and do for fun.

Mostly because people don't believe us, though.

On the P&G Film, it is most definately real. I've seen a rather nicely stabalized version and I swear I could see the fat bounce when it walked, and the muscle tighten when it picked up its feet.

As to the current pics, the 'Bigfoot' is too short, the 'face' is way too gorillia like, and last time I checked Bigfoot didn't have LED lights in his eyes.
My official anylasis: FAKE

HAHA!!
That guy in the gorilla suit looks like my ex-boyfriend..lol

I think that this is a fakey. Unfortunately.

It looks too short to be Bigfoot (or Sassie, or Orang Pendek or whatever you wanna call him)
Plus the way he is positioned is just too convenient. He was just popping his head out form behind a tree and the photographer took the pic? Accidentally giving him red-eye?

Plus the tufts of fur from the side of the face seem artificial to me.

Proberly a picture of a Zoo

The 1-liners on this page are unwanted.

If there is nothing you have to say, don't post. Okay?

The next 1-liner I see will get a 20 point deduction and that would put a couple of you into the minus or near it.

Originally posted by masqua
The 1-liners on this page are unwanted.

If there is nothing you have to say, don't post. Okay?

The next 1-liner I see will get a 20 point deduction and that would put a couple of you into the minus or near it.

What does that mean? People can't post messages that are 1 line long?? How come? Maybe thats all they have to say. Pretty screwed up rules if you ask me.

Honestly the Gorilla looks like it was taken from an old poster for the san diego wildlife park that I think I remember seeing back in the day. Looks like they just cut and pasted then touched up the photo so that "bigfoot" looks to be in the shot. The face is clearly a female gorilla though, probably not even a suite, just some photoshopping. The Grimlin Patterson video in my opinion still does look like the real thing. Maybe if they had used sign language Koko there wouldn't have charged them supposedly. Also why charge an intruder if your a nomadic bigfoot with children? They apparently utilize a large territory for them selves, so why not just grab the kids and go to the next ridge for the day? It's safer.