It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Is this a Humanoid skull on Mars ?

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 07:08 PM
link   
Sorry if this has been posted before but i did a search and nothing come up.


If you look at the full photo on NASA's site the skull sticks out like a dogs balls, all other rocks have such basics shapes and then this..........






The full story

NASA's site



[edit on 28-8-2006 by helium3]




posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by helium3
Sorry if this has been posted before but i did a search and nothing come up.


If you look at the full photo on NASA's site the skull sticks out like a dogs balls, all other rocks have such basics shapes and then this..........






The full story

NASA's site



[edit on 28-8-2006 by helium3]

thats really kewl could be doctored though still nice pic



posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 07:17 PM
link   
would NASA post doctored images on the official website ?



posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 07:18 PM
link   
Really looks more like a damaged storm trooper helmet.

I used to look at cloud formations as a kid and I could see ........



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 01:06 AM
link   
helium3,

The websights provided some intriguing information. Very interesting find, indeed. The pictures and correlation to known skulls on earth of long gone species is extraordinary, but unfortunatley may be coincidental. But, one can not disprove the similarities.



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 01:18 AM
link   
Definately looks skull like. My first thought, Darth Vaders Helmet.

Nice find though.



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 02:30 AM
link   
Face on mars, mechanical bits on mars and now a skull. I do like evidence but to me all of these things are simply freak rock formations.

Just as someone else said it's like looking at clouds and seeing shapes.



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 02:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by mojo4sale
Definately looks skull like. My first thought, Darth Vaders Helmet.

Nice find though.

But what are the odds that we would find just HIS helmet among the millions of stormtroopers?



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 03:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by merka

Originally posted by mojo4sale
Definately looks skull like. My first thought, Darth Vaders Helmet.

Nice find though.

But what are the odds that we would find just HIS helmet among the millions of stormtroopers?



Ya, it may have been a "Long Time Ago", but it was not "In a galaxy far far away.."



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 03:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by helium3
would NASA post doctored images on the official website ?


That's what they're paid for!! I daresay 90% of their pics are doctored. So we don't get to know the truth! And send us on a wild goose chase.



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 03:32 AM
link   
The external link and pic seem to be dead (for me anyway). But, I can pull up the NASA pic and easily find the anomaly in the bottom left.

Definitely looks like a decayed, (possibly from salt water and coral), storm trooper helmet. Mars was amphibiously attacked by the Empire it seems.

In all seriousness, could be something



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 03:38 AM
link   
dead for me too ;p coverup or server down



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 03:40 AM
link   
dead for me too ;p coverup or server down



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 03:59 AM
link   
The links work for me!

Looks pretty interesting. Amazing they even photographed it and then didn't smash it up with their "rover" or whatever they used.

Is it real? Who knows. I don’t believe it is a "natural rock" due to the fact that the holes for the "eyes" are symmetrical and the rest also seems symmetrical. Skull or helmet? Well considering there was supposed to have been a war, quite possibly a helmet as I would venture to say that a skull would have broken up or disintegrated.



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 09:20 AM
link   
Real cool pic.
It is just unforchant that it seems to have been doctored. But then the question remains, was it doctered to creat the immage, or to hide it? I guess they could have done a better job if they wanted to hide it, so the question remains, why did they not do a better job in hiding it?



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 10:02 AM
link   
It does not look human, maybe a different animal, that is if the picture is real.
If it has been doctored, they done a good job of getting the skull on the picture, but I fell that this picture is unreliable, NASA have a history of lies and deciept, a prime example, in my opinion, is the moon landing although I would like to be proved wrong regarding this picture.

[edit on 29-8-2006 by speight89]



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 11:21 AM
link   
Its just a normal rock and we always try to make images out of random formations.

It would probably look totally different at another angle or in different light conditions.



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 11:41 AM
link   
There is a similarity between a skull and the object ,but I would have to say It is a rock that is skull like in shape.

Just my opinion.



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 02:23 PM
link   
The 'eye sockets' seem to bulge outward rather than be hollows in the 'skull'. The temples of the 'skull' extend to nearly the center of the orbits of the brow ...

But I can see how it might look like a skull. in a rorschach kind of way. But it could also be a couple of dark rocks on a lighter one.

I think the miniture 'grave' affect is interesting, though.



posted on Aug, 29 2006 @ 03:14 PM
link   
To be honest with you, I think this is a pile of rocks.

And btw, find me a modern religion that hasn't said something butt ugly about non-belivers/non-members, and I will buy you a beer.

Interesting to see anti-them garbage in the Talmud. That makes poor religeous sportsmanship 4 for 4 in the western judaic religions.

[edit on 29-8-2006 by Ectoterrestrial]



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join