It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Truth Under Attack: Debunking 9/11 Myths

page: 1
0

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 06:58 AM
link   


"America has much to learn from 9/11, but the conspiracy mongering poisons the discourse and dishonors the victims of a national tragedy."
Senator John McCain
Popular Mechanics- Sept 2006

Conspiracy theories about Sept. 11, 2001, continue to spread...
Now in a meticulous, scientific and ground breaking new book, Popular Mechanics puts these rumors to rest.

Foreword by Senator John McCain
ISBN# 1-58816-635-X
To order please call 1-866-338-3778
To learn more, visit www.debunking911myths.com


Or as it is; www.popularmechanics.com...

I read the article, soon as the book arives I am going to read it cover to cover. After which I will go over the material here, and so you all know I have and will be in touch with McCain. His site is at mccain.senate.gov...

God bless all of you and yours.
We will never forget...

UNITED WE STAND THE REST IS NOT AN OPTION!

[edit on 28-8-2006 by ADVISOR]




posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 07:26 AM
link   
1. Call the questioner a "CTer", or the line of questions a conspiracy theory.
2. Ridicule the questioner because they now are a "CTer".
3. Accuse the questioner of being unpatriotic.
4. Then move the questioner from the category of "nut" to "poison".
5. *Unsure what they do to you next - we'll call this step TBD.*
6. Rinse
7. Repeat until you're tired.
8. Hang out to dry.



posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 07:38 AM
link   
Val the thing is though, just as those of us have our beleifs on this, so do those who have chosen other beleifs. We can all see this as the same picture, but some people have a glare in the visual, and others don't, who sees the picture best.

We all, do. From our own perspectives, if we are going to represent the best conspiracy community, we should not act any less than just that. It is not US vs MCcain or the gov or pop mechanics, is is all of us trying to figure out what happened.

I agree with MCcain on almost everything, and I can see his point in this situation.
Lets give them the chance they deserve, and the opportunity to present what they beleive.

This is another situation to be professional, and who better to do so than ATS.



posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 09:17 AM
link   
Hey there.

What I am about to say should be kept within the conversation of this forum.
If it was broadcasted on television, it could lead to a world war. So, if you talk about it, say that it is only your creative opinion. Thank you.

To explain 9-11 is to explain WHY we would want to change anything in Irag. The United States has a major debt problem. The reasons the U.S. Dollar is still of good value is because the oil in the middle east uses the U.S. Dollar as the trading currency and the United States Dollar is also still supported by other major trading countries who still keep the Dollar of value by trading with us. Saddam Hussain chose to switch his country's oil trading currency from the Dollar to the Euro in early 2001. The Euro was and still is of higher value so it would help the country of Iraq on an economical basis. But, the United States found that direction of the oil countries switching from the Dollar to the Euro to be a direction that would lower the value of the Dollar so much that it could no longer compete with the rising of the value of the Euro. So, the United States secret government which rules over the visible government chose to hoax a terrorist attack that would receive enough approval from the world to go to war in a small country, so then later with an approved agenda and momentum, actually attack a country(Iraq) just to change the oil currency of trade back to the Dollar and keep control over much of the oil trade policies. You see the real reason that we need oil trading for a while to go. We don't have to because the U.S. does have free/gravitational energy.
So, when they talk about "terrorists", say that they captured the leaders alive without a fight ounce again, and talk about the victums to make you feel too guilty to show everybody the real truth, just play along because you don't want to start World War 3 by letting the other countries know this information. And, now you know why the government wants you to accept 9-11 as a real terrorist attack.

Again, please do not talk about this information. It should be kept secret from the media. I believe you would agree if you support world peace and prosperity like I do. I just find it alright if a few people on a forum know this information since they seek the truth anyways.



posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 04:25 PM
link   
realanswers, care to back any of that statement up? The whole Keep this secret thing really made me laugh, i don't know about anybody else. For your information this forum is PUBLIC.



posted on Aug, 28 2006 @ 04:41 PM
link   

Originally posted by ADVISOR
Lets give them the chance they deserve, and the opportunity to present what they beleive.


Here you go...
The National 9/11 Debate


National 9/11 Debate: Date, Time, Location
As of August 1, 2006, the 9/11 Commissioners, NIST scientists, and other key personnel responsible for the government’s non-sustainable account of what happened in the United States on September 11, 2001 all refuse to participate in the National 9/11 Debate that was originally scheduled for September 16, 2006 in Charleston, SC.


And...


Popular Mechanics invited to the National 9/11 Debate

This letter / invitation was “hard copy” mailed to Popular Mechanics Editor-In-Chief James B. Meigs, and editors of the Popular Mechanics book, Debunking 9/11 Myths, Brad Reagan and David Dunbar. Meigs was recently on Fox News, O’Reilly Factor touting the Popular Mechanics book as the final answer on 9/11. Let’s see if they really stand behind their work! Call them, write them, e-mail them, and let them know its time to debate because their book is debatable!


Right now, it looks like nobody really wants to (or is able to?) defend the official story.


edit: Oh, wait... there is one
...

Press Release – August 15, 2006
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Dr. Frank R. Greening to argue in support of government account of the events of September 11, 2001 at the National 9/11 Debate


[edit on 28-8-2006 by mecheng]



posted on Sep, 13 2006 @ 07:11 PM
link   
That is probably mostly due to the fact od the over all situations sensitivity. Reasons not needing explaining I hope, but there is the topic and interest, from all sides and parties. If we can only but agree to disagree, is it not thatmuch more we have at the least, in common.

Sounds absolutly normal to me, but the material is being brought into the public eye more readily than ever before.

Like it has been said, better late, than never...



posted on Sep, 14 2006 @ 06:58 AM
link   
Come on, there has to be more members who have soething on this to say. There seems to be plenty of talk going around when it comes to non issue of actual relevence, why not in a situation that has gained public attention?

This is going mainstream and no one else is even interested in replying or spouting of some anti conspiracy or skeptic suggestions...I'm baffled.
That just don't make no sence at all...

Was there by chance a recent spree of UFOs that was missed?



posted on Sep, 19 2006 @ 12:34 PM
link   
Those who control the "Top Secrets" and high levels of secrecy can control and overrule any of the countries laws, directions, and commands by keeping their operations in secret from congress and the public.
The CIA and some people in the White House are the ones who knew about the plans to stage the 9-11 attack, not congress or lower level people in government like soldiers and security officers. Those lower level people in government just follow orders and rarely receive full explainations of what is really going on.


[edit on 19-9-2006 by realanswers]

[edit on 19-9-2006 by realanswers]



posted on Sep, 19 2006 @ 12:40 PM
link   

Originally posted by mecheng
Right now, it looks like nobody really wants to (or is able to?) defend the official story.



Probably because it would go something like it does on here.

Side 1-presents evidence
Side 2-presents counterevidence
Side 1-calls side 2 government disinfo agents
Side 2-calls side 1 CT nutjobs

"Debate" degenerates into total chaos.



new topics

top topics



 
0

log in

join