Truth Under Attack: Debunking 9/11 Myths, page 1
Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 28-8-2006 @ 09:17 AM by realanswers
Hey there.

What I am about to say should be kept within the conversation of this forum.
If it was broadcasted on television, it could lead to a world war. So, if you talk about it, say that it is only your creative opinion. Thank you.

To explain 9-11 is to explain WHY we would want to change anything in Irag. The United States has a major debt problem. The reasons the U.S. Dollar is still of good value is because the oil in the middle east uses the U.S. Dollar as the trading currency and the United States Dollar is also still supported by other major trading countries who still keep the Dollar of value by trading with us. Saddam Hussain chose to switch his country's oil trading currency from the Dollar to the Euro in early 2001. The Euro was and still is of higher value so it would help the country of Iraq on an economical basis. But, the United States found that direction of the oil countries switching from the Dollar to the Euro to be a direction that would lower the value of the Dollar so much that it could no longer compete with the rising of the value of the Euro. So, the United States secret government which rules over the visible government chose to hoax a terrorist attack that would receive enough approval from the world to go to war in a small country, so then later with an approved agenda and momentum, actually attack a country(Iraq) just to change the oil currency of trade back to the Dollar and keep control over much of the oil trade policies. You see the real reason that we need oil trading for a while to go. We don't have to because the U.S. does have free/gravitational energy.
So, when they talk about "terrorists", say that they captured the leaders alive without a fight ounce again, and talk about the victums to make you feel too guilty to show everybody the real truth, just play along because you don't want to start World War 3 by letting the other countries know this information. And, now you know why the government wants you to accept 9-11 as a real terrorist attack.

Again, please do not talk about this information. It should be kept secret from the media. I believe you would agree if you support world peace and prosperity like I do. I just find it alright if a few people on a forum know this information since they seek the truth anyways.


reply posted on 28-8-2006 @ 04:41 PM by mecheng
Originally posted by ADVISOR
Lets give them the chance they deserve, and the opportunity to present what they beleive.


Here you go...
The National 9/11 Debate

National 9/11 Debate: Date, Time, Location
As of August 1, 2006, the 9/11 Commissioners, NIST scientists, and other key personnel responsible for the government’s non-sustainable account of what happened in the United States on September 11, 2001 all refuse to participate in the National 9/11 Debate that was originally scheduled for September 16, 2006 in Charleston, SC.


And...

Popular Mechanics invited to the National 9/11 Debate

This letter / invitation was “hard copy” mailed to Popular Mechanics Editor-In-Chief James B. Meigs, and editors of the Popular Mechanics book, Debunking 9/11 Myths, Brad Reagan and David Dunbar. Meigs was recently on Fox News, O’Reilly Factor touting the Popular Mechanics book as the final answer on 9/11. Let’s see if they really stand behind their work! Call them, write them, e-mail them, and let them know its time to debate because their book is debatable!


Right now, it looks like nobody really wants to (or is able to?) defend the official story.

edit: Oh, wait... there is one...
Press Release – August 15, 2006
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Dr. Frank R. Greening to argue in support of government account of the events of September 11, 2001 at the National 9/11 Debate


[edit on 28-8-2006 by mecheng]
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



A Galaxy not so far away ~ Beautiful Pics
  Posted 4 days ago with 5 member flags
Inspiration Is The Promised Land.
  Posted 5 days ago with 1 member flags